2022 Election
"BTW. Sharing a different opinion or view is not lying."
Except when it is.
Sheepdog wrote:Roadkill writes "it is everywhere...it is all Albo is..a weak nobody"
So you're more of a happy clappy hillsong hawaii hose april sun in little cuba kinda guy, RK?
Did you call yourself sheepdog because you like running around in circles chasing your tail?
2022 Recent Budget bankrolls a Mystery Voter's bribe (Oddly with no specific Time or date )
28th April ...Worst ever Inflation Rate...kicks the shit outta Govt's re-election hopes
28th April ...Treasurer : "Voters are already automatically accepting our $250 election bribe from today."
Happy Pensioner : "Libs can manage my Economy any time, thank you!...where do I vote!"
How the fuck does AEC allow Govt to Mass bribe the Electorate to timely offset a bad campaign day?
No Opposition Parties say a word about sordid blatant corrupt open ended Vote buying...Huh!
Campaign had Zero cred to begin with...electorate is now complicate in Mass Vote Rigging! Nice!
Sheepdog wrote:Indo writes "BTW. Sharing a different opinion or view is not lying."
So you're saying Morrison is wrong? That your comment - "if labor get in and push wages up too fast, its going to be like adding fuel to a fire" is correct?
And that Morrisons claims are wrong? - " (albo) has no magic pen that makes your wages go up"- "He's running around telling everybody he can lift their wages, he can't do that, he knows he can't do that and it's a false promise"
Your view is correct and the prime minister is incorrect? yes or no?
Technically the government can encourage wage growth by lifting the min wage, but seeing its so high on a global scale, its not a realistic option for any sensible government.
LNP have little sway or need to please unions so little effect there
Labor are under much more pressure to try to encourage the increase of wages and are reckless, they probably would raise the min wage again just too please people and unions in a short term type way then cop the negative effects.
They are also in bed with unions who can play all types of silly fun and games to get what they want.
"Workers of the world unite"
Of coarse Indo doesn't want wages to rise. It would cost him money.
I don't think Indo is coarse at all - in fact, quite the opposite.
indo-dreaming wrote:Sheepdog wrote:Indo writes "BTW. Sharing a different opinion or view is not lying."
So you're saying Morrison is wrong? That your comment - "if labor get in and push wages up too fast, its going to be like adding fuel to a fire" is correct?
And that Morrisons claims are wrong? - " (albo) has no magic pen that makes your wages go up"- "He's running around telling everybody he can lift their wages, he can't do that, he knows he can't do that and it's a false promise"
Your view is correct and the prime minister is incorrect? yes or no?Labor are under much more pressure to try to encourage the increase of wages and are reckless, they probably would raise the min wage again just too please people and unions in a short term type way then cop the negative effects.
It will be interesting to see if they will do that considering they ruled out an increase to the dole (BTW what is the official name for the dole. It keeps changing, which one is it now). I was quite surprised by that actually, I thought they will definitely take a dole increase to the election.
AndyM wrote:What the fritz is that sound??
Sounds like gears grinding.
Kinda sounds like it's coming from down near the Mornington Peninsula.
Whatever could it be??
Ay ay take it easy there Andy, he’s from Phillip island if you don’t mind. Sheeesh.
mattlock wrote:"Workers of the world unite"
Of coarse Indo doesn't want wages to rise. It would cost him money.
I never said i don't want wages to rise, i don't employee anyone anymore too much hassle and work, and i just charge what i want anyway.
I just fear wages rising too quick adding wage push inflation on top of general inflation and then rates have to rise more than would otherwise be needed and we end up in a recession.
Lots of people just think wage rises means all positives, when it in itself can fuel inflation.
Vote No to Peter the Fox's Mandated registration to rifle thru Auntie's unmentionables.
More grooming for dirty filthy Fox bastardized backdoor entry.
https://tvblackbox.com.au/page/2021/11/15/peter-tonagh-named-deputy-chai...
If any still held out hope that Daggy Dad would come thru...forget it...Scomo just sold us out!
Fox illegal sellout / lockout of our Fully paid up NBN / ABC Free View just cost Scomo the Election.
Pig of a man...downright bully & all know it...Holding Aunty Hostage until we sign for her release.
Violation of Privacy Act 1988...Individuals "must" have option to alt' when dealing with APP.
Only by Law/Court or where impracticable > not the case for Aunty...[L] Unlawful Act. (Vote them out!)
Scomo mandates sign in to foreign Vanguard-Blackrock perverts Google / Amazon / Facebook / Meta.
News this week...Already Boofhead Scomo surrendered our Oz - US Pacific NBN / ABC security.
China now boss & tap into Pacific Islands NBN / ABC ... much easier to sign direct to the Red Army.
Lychees in Hanfu are coming down the stairs.
https://itwire.com/it-industry-news/strategy/abc-iview-logins-may-raise-...
Indo, I asked a simple yes or no question.
Morrison said---- " (albo) has no magic pen that makes your wages go up"- "He's running around telling everybody he can lift their wages, he can't do that, he knows he can't do that and it's a false promise"...
But YOU said ---- "if labor get in and push wages up too fast, its going to be like adding fuel to a fire"
You say Labor can push wages up. Scommo says they can't".
Are you calling Scomo a liar? Yes or No?
Actually, your recent comment answered it for me. You are calling Morrison a liar, by stating "Technically the government can encourage wage growth by lifting the min wage"
Indo points out Scott Morrison is a liar. Who'd a thunk it hahahahaha
Sheepdog wrote:Indo, I asked a simple yes or no question.
Morrison said---- " (albo) has no magic pen that makes your wages go up"- "He's running around telling everybody he can lift their wages, he can't do that, he knows he can't do that and it's a false promise"...
But YOU said ---- "if labor get in and push wages up too fast, its going to be like adding fuel to a fire"
You say Labor can push wages up. Scommo says they can't".
Are you calling Scomo a liar? Yes or No?
Actually, your recent comment answered it for me. You are calling Morrison a liar, by stating "Technically the government can encourage wage growth by lifting the min wage"
Indo points out Scott Morrison is a liar. Who'd a thunk it hahahahaha
Ive already explained it, but yeah no surprised you dont get it.
Id hate to break it to you, but the world isn't always black and white and is often more complex than a straight yes or no answer.
I haven’t heard slomo sprouting that we have a “ strong “ economy and that they are the “ better economic managers “ for a few days now , has the Scott Morrison Party been exposed as the frauds they really are ? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-04-28/fact-check-jim-chalmers-tax-debt-...
Here’s a list of literally over 1000 reasons not to vote for the LNP.
Bon Appetite!
https://www.mdavis.xyz/govlist/
I’m just going to come out and say it- If you vote LNP in the coming election you have no regard for Australia or Australians. There is no question of me being politically partisan, the LNP are simply not operating for the good of our nation. They cannot get in under any circumstance.
DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:Here’s a list of literally over 1000 reasons not to vote for the LNP.
Bon Appetite!
https://www.mdavis.xyz/govlist/
I’m just going to come out and say it- If you vote LNP in the coming election you have no regard for Australia or Australians. There is no question of me being politically partisan, the LNP are simply not operating for the good of our nation. They cannot get in under any circumstance.
100%
I’m voting Sustainable Australia in the senate and independent in House of Representatives. Put LNP last and ALP 2nd last. Bleed the major parties into the purgatory they deserve.
DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:I’m voting Sustainable Australia in the senate and independent in House of Representatives. Put LNP last and ALP 2nd last. Bleed the major parties into the purgatory they deserve.
Good for you Blowin, at least you have The Scott Morrison Party last
Free Speech! Free Speech!
Pauline Hanson’s Please Explain
— Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 (@PaulineHansonOz) April 28, 2022
Episode 24 “Please Explain Voter Fraud”
More from @OneNationAus: https://t.co/hXJmbOoLSJ pic.twitter.com/qdDu5BpY4g
. The owners must be really struggling , not bad taxpayers coin .How many women did Jason Clare say were living in cars around Byron ... over 400? https://t.co/drdT0bVdip
— Coalition Tea Lady (@ItsBouquet) April 29, 2022
Maybe they could give their JobKeeper payments back? pic.twitter.com/yRWfSLVq1r
— Jommy Tee 🌐 (@jommy_tee) April 29, 2022
@BelindaJones68
— NOT a Canberra Bubbler 🌲🌏🌲 (@MSMWatchdog2013) April 29, 2022
What a Lark. https://t.co/n6dr0tbbdF pic.twitter.com/7eqqDpE6zu
8 employees
Do your job
— 💧Bee LCP Senate Candidate for QLD🌿🐝 (@BelindaJones68) April 29, 2022
Delve into the backstory of Lark Distillery
You'll find Bruce Mathieson Snr invested in Lark Sept 2020
Mathieson Snr is worth $1.8 billion, ALH owner, partner of Woolworths, friend of Barnaby, Lib/Nat donor - so why is the PM giving Lark $4.5 million?
🐝#auspol
DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:I’m voting Sustainable Australia in the senate and independent in House of Representatives. Put LNP last and ALP 2nd last. Bleed the major parties into the purgatory they deserve.
What about the Greens?
They're dead last for me.
thermalben wrote:Free Speech! Free Speech!
https://twitter.com/PaulineHansonOz/status/1519784636699709440
Whats going on?..you beat me to it.
Social media companies have removed a video posted online by Pauline Hanson that showed cartoon Labor figures committing voter fraud.
The Australian Electoral Commission confirmed it had contacted Facebook, TikTok, Reddit, Twitter and YouTube after the video, the latest in a One Nation satirical series, was posted on Friday morning.
The video depicted the Labor leader, Anthony Albanese, and Senator Penny Wong discussing how they would use the details of dead people and pets to cast votes in the upcoming election. The AEC responded to a tweet asking whether the video was illegal to describe it as “deeply disappointing”.
In a statement, the AEC said:
Freedom of speech is important and we don’t regulate truth in campaigning or political communication. However, we’re concerned with any communication, regardless of the source, that doesn’t accurately reflect electoral processes or integrity measures we implement.
We’re active on social media to accurately reflect how we administer the federal election and refer pieces of online communication to social media organisations for their consideration when necessary.
Facebook and TikTok removed the video, while it was flagged as misleading on Twitter. It was believed to still be available on other platforms.
The AEC said:
There is no evidence that the level of apparent multiple voting in Australia has ever been sufficient to overturn the margin in any one contest. If it was to occur the result could be referred to the court of disputed returns.
We regularly receive data from births, deaths and marriages to take deceased Australians off the roll. We also validate postal vote applications against the roll prior to distribution and again upon receipt of a completed postal vote.
We’re aware that Meta [Facebook’s parent company] and TikTok have taken the video down as it violates their policies. [We are] unsure of action on other channels at this stage.
Hanson said in a statement to Guardian Australia that similar claims to those depicted in the video had been made multiple times in Senate estimates, but a spokesperson was unable to provide specific examples.
Hanson said:
This kind of corruption depicted in the cartoon has been going on for years, it’s been exposed in Senate estimates before.
Obviously, it’s being exposed again, and the AEC has been embarrassed by that, and the ALP have been embarrassed by that, so they put pressure on the AEC to get it taken down.
A spokesperson for One Nation added that:
It’s a shame these platforms can’t recognise satire for what it is. Those who shut down free speech fear free speech because they don’t understand it.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2022/apr/29/australia-po...
indo-dreaming wrote:DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:I’m voting Sustainable Australia in the senate and independent in House of Representatives. Put LNP last and ALP 2nd last. Bleed the major parties into the purgatory they deserve.
What about the Greens?
They're dead last for me.
That’s because you’re a kook who doesn’t look at policy.
Old slomo has been getting on the piss a fair bit this campaign, if he’s not pouring beers in pubs he’s necking shots of whiskey in tassie ihttps://www.theshovel.com.au/2022/04/29/morrison-cost-of-living-whiskey-.... Morrison addresses cost of living pressure with $4.5m subsidy for single malt whiskey
That's gold SF.
Constance B Gibson wrote:"What about the Greens?
They're dead last for me"
Yeah, but, 'cept I used to vote for 'em, I fink, can't remember exactly, back when I used to rip off other cunt's weed, cheat on my ex chicks, and shit smear my own pants.
Now all the way with LN Paaaay.
Yew!
A pony mullet is still a pony mullet, id.
A pony mullet of the mind,
PURE GOLD
The concept of a political party devoted to prioritising the environment is extremely attractive and surely a vote winner. It’s therefore a shame that the reality of the Greens is an unelectable rabble of mentally stunted hypocrites. I say that with regret because I would vote for them at every opportunity if it wasn’t true.
It’s possible that the media is finally coming around to the idea that two
party politics is a false necessity.
“ So what to call this new multi-hued parliament if it comes about after May 21?
‘Mixed’ might work. Or ‘Open’, like an open share register in business. Overseas, where in many constituencies single-party majorities are rare, they sometimes use ‘Balanced’ to describe a parliament of many components. Multi-Party maybe?
I could live with all of them. Certainly, any is better than ‘hung’.”
https://thenewdaily.com.au/opinion/2022/04/30/hung-parliament-political-...
soggydog wrote:indo-dreaming wrote:DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:I’m voting Sustainable Australia in the senate and independent in House of Representatives. Put LNP last and ALP 2nd last. Bleed the major parties into the purgatory they deserve.
What about the Greens?
They're dead last for me.
That’s because you’re a kook who doesn’t look at policy.
Pretty clear who the kook is, if you think Greens policy is at all realistic, Greens are no different to United Australia Party or many if not all other small parties that basically say anything to get people to vote for them.
They can do this because they are never going to get into government so their policy will never be tested and exposed as totally unrealistic, unlike LNP and Labor that might put a little spin on things but generally need realistic policy and costed policy, because its going to be tested.
By all means vote for the Greens as a protest vote and to put a stick in the spokes type thing, but don't kid yourself their policy is in anyway realistic.
As Blowin has also pointed out their immigration policy is in total contrast to their green spin, the biggest pressure on the environment comes from increased population growth generally from immigration.
And things like affordable housing, can you imagine how much affordable housing would be under greens with increased pop growth, locking up more forrest, locking up more land for housing.
Let's not even talk about defence or economic policy or their totally unrealistic energy policy.
The party is a joke a fairies in the sky party, a party you vote for as a kid when you have no idea but think Greens sound good, or for people that live in the city and are detached from the reality of the rest of Australia and reality in general, the type thst bang on about how evil big business and mining is, while using their apple I phone to post their rants on Facebook while sitting in McDonalds in Newtown.
A party fun of contradictions for people who are full of contradictions.
BTW. On a similar topic while i cant stand Dan Andrews, hats off to Labor in Victoria for supporting the removal of netting in Port Phillip Bay that was proposed under LNP, both LNP and Labor supported the move, that will only have positive effects on fish stocks and be a big plus for the sustainability of recreational fishing in he bay for future generations..
But guess what party didn't support the change?
Yes the fkn Greens, i guess because they oppose recreational fishing.
"End of the line for commercial net fishing in Port Phillip Bay"
https://www.theage.com.au/melbourne-news/end-of-the-line-for-commercial-...
@indo
“(Greens) policy will never be tested”
Greens policy had been showcased again and again for decades.
The positive impact of greens policy on Australia is substantial possibly even profound.
Ha ha surely you are just trolling me?
The most recent Greens policy that Labor adopted was the Greens open borders policy that saw Rudd do a 360 back flip after it was a complete failure
I mean seriously this is a party that claim to be Green but even voted against a carbon tax because it wasn't exactly what they wanted.
They are as nutty as the United Australia party.
Indo if you don’t understand the impact and influence the Greens have had om environmental issues and also their role in the Senate, i’m just going to have to dismiss you as a gob shite.
Their influence is quite clear and I’m not even a greens voter.
indo-dreaming wrote:BTW. On a similar topic while i cant stand Dan Andrews, hats off to Labor in Victoria for supporting the removal of netting in Port Phillip Bay that was proposed under LNP, both LNP and Labor supported the move, that will only have positive effects on fish stocks and be a big plus for the sustainability of recreational fishing in he bay for future generations..
But guess what party didn't support the change?
Yes the fkn Greens, i guess because they oppose recreational fishing.
"End of the line for commercial net fishing in Port Phillip Bay"
https://www.theage.com.au/melbourne-news/end-of-the-line-for-commercial-...
@info factcheck
Just coz @info finks it happened, well its not necessarily so ..........
Fisheries Amendment Bill 2015 was introduced by Dan Andrews
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/labor-government-end-netting-port-phillip...
Dan Andrews was elected in December 2014
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/people-in-parliament/premier-of-...
Some classic comments on our current deputy prime minister
Live TV with Barnaby Joyce.#auspol pic.twitter.com/WcJjJwu9iA
— Squizz (@SquizzSTK) April 30, 2022
Haha, barnyard on fire.
Pacific Commitment...salute Indo for Last Sunday's top rundown of Oz Aid to Solomon Is.
91% locals are Christians who oppose Atheist China "SWITCH"
UNCLOS United Nations Convention on the Law Of the Sea...ratified by 168 Nations.(Incl...Russia, China)
Lawless hold outs are yer Borderline Dictatorships > (US / North Korea / Iran / Israel )
Note US are big fans of Slavery / Nazis / Torture so why not Piracy...fits their #1 Bully Job Description!
Prez Clinton closed US Solomon Is Embassy in 1993 (Could not give a Fuck!)
After each US Presidential Election it takes One & half years for Pres Trump or Biden to find Australia.
As Trump neglected us before...Biden still has not posted Oz a US Ambassador. ( Wotz a Pacific...where!)
So how about as US ignores South Pacific we just ignore our Pacific NBN slave masters.
Here's the Flip...2022 China celebrates 50 years of a proper Oz Embassy with actual credible staff!
http://au.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/
2013 Xi & 2014 PM Sogavare 3/4th Terms (Longer trusted ties than Oz Democracy can afford!)
Yes! Unlike US they do have Embassy in Solomon Is.
Oz does also but Aid to Solomon Is (In real terms) has been decreasing since Peak in 2011.
Rudd ramped Aid $170m > 2011 $230m (Peak) > [L] Cut it by half $115m >$125m
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/solomons-how-australia-sta...
No evidence of any generous Aid boost to Solomons under several Lib PMs...nor would any expect such.
But Oz is still the biggest donor by a long way + see Wild Colonial Mates Contracts in Indo's top list.
Climate Change
5 Solomon Islands were taken by the sea...Oz Coal & Climate Change were to blame.
Oz Top Level responses
PM : "This is Coal! I can ram it down our neighbour's throats to prevent them from speaking ill of it...Ok!"
Dutto : "Is this microphone on? Good! Had enough of this Lappin' at yer Door Clap Trap!" Did ya get that!
Dep PM : "I still don't get how Kanakas can drown while slaving on an Oz farm picking by fruit!"
Pretty sure there's nothing in any of that [L] exploitation banter that would weaken our ties.
China Crisis
Solomon Islands needs less Coal Mined rising seas & but need to retain more above sea level Islands.
Crew know that only China can both reclaim & sea proof these Solomon Islands Wave Stadiums.
So what benefit does China get from reclaiming Scomo's flooded Solomon Islands
Only Everything...including Pacific Domination with the flick of a humanitarian's pen...huh?
The only Two world bodies that China shows respect is UNCLOS & ATS . (Why!)
For a long time China wish to annex more land by Law not War.
Slowly breaking down interpretations of Law to sway innocent Voting Blocks.
Here's how the Law of the Sea stands...(Obviously we gotta excuse the US Bullies!)
3nm Contiguous : Sovereignty
12nm Territorial : Laws / Regulations / Customs / Immigration / Pollution
......Huge jump from Territory to Independent EEZ UN powerful ( eg: French Island voting Nation )......
200nm EEZ : ( War Zone ) Resources / Subs / Cables / Fly Overs
350nm Continental Shelf : Sub sea bed - Exploration / Mining / Gases.
World sees these endless shared breaching of territorial fights play out in South / China Sea.
Oz / Timor has similar fights over 350nm Continental Shelf.
China's reclaimed Pacific Islands need self sustaining life to be granted 200nm Independence
China's seeking Antarctic Exploration 200nm > 350nm to lay cables to World #1 Sat' Beacon.
Chinese reclaimed Islands can produce Crops & Desal & ask how about now? (Nope!) Fark!
Article 21 is rather stubborn or impossibly precise for want of a better word.
"Naturally formed Area of Land being able to sustain Human Habitation to supporting own economy."
Basically! No ring-ins or Food Drops!
Enter Solomon Islands...each sunken Island > features "Natural / Habitat / Economic Zone!"
If say China could Reclaim / Lease Sunken Solomon Islands for the Locals...now yer in business!
Then all Climate Change Bodies would crown China as Miracle Workers & Islands reclaim powers!
This in turn is a watershed moment ...setting a breakthru precedent for historic reclaimed Reefs alike.
Meaning China should Lawfully be afforded Island Nations on behalf of former inhabitants.
Full 200-350nm Zones over all key Shipping Gateways by Dozens of like minded independent Nations.
The prize is that no one will denounce Chinese reclaimed Solomon Islands as less than legit.
All here know that only China can undertake such noble Climate Change reclamation.
We read that Dozens of Airports are being upgraded ...(re: Larger faster constant payloads)
So we do know for sure that logistics to support Island upgrades is paramount...Ships just plug in!
To the Victor goes the Spoils!
Now consider island Hopping 350nm at a time to next Seamount to next to Sydney...
China will control world Sea Stock / Pacific Shipping / Cables
(Can reclaim 5 such islands or 2,500 Footy Ovals / 5 years)
No need to fight when the World is your Oyster!
Not if but when China is granted Individual Territory for each (Like the French) It's game over!
Only one Nation can build New Nations thru-out Pacific & Out vote UN on every thing, every time!
Thereby making WAR obsolete!
Ask! Could Australia even reclaim a sustainable Island Outpost? Like What!
If Not! Then what use are we to Solomon Islands...perhaps Hillsong Chapter could run a Mission.
For the record, Vietnam / Philippines have also built small sized Islands with Crops & Air Strips...
No...tbb can find no mention of China reclaiming Solomon Islands...but reckon it's #1 reason for Switch!
Also why PM Sogavare blew his cool & told Oz to fuck off! (PM can't share China's Legacy Project!)
All about semantics...China could build a Base on non existing soon reclaimed Island.
Not Solomon Islands but a nearby newly named Province emerges from the sea...Just like that!
If any want background to Chinese Island claims...check out UK Sealand / Pirate Radio...or Rock outcrops.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/04/17/why-japan-...
GuySmiley wrote:indo-dreaming wrote:BTW. On a similar topic while i cant stand Dan Andrews, hats off to Labor in Victoria for supporting the removal of netting in Port Phillip Bay that was proposed under LNP, both LNP and Labor supported the move, that will only have positive effects on fish stocks and be a big plus for the sustainability of recreational fishing in he bay for future generations..
But guess what party didn't support the change?
Yes the fkn Greens, i guess because they oppose recreational fishing.
"End of the line for commercial net fishing in Port Phillip Bay"
https://www.theage.com.au/melbourne-news/end-of-the-line-for-commercial-...@info factcheck
Just coz @info finks it happened, well its not necessarily so ..........
Fisheries Amendment Bill 2015 was introduced by Dan Andrews
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/labor-government-end-netting-port-phillip...Dan Andrews was elected in December 2014
https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/about/people-in-parliament/premier-of-...
Fuck you're an A grade tosser, i give Labor a compliment and you still bring your negative BS to the conversation, Im pretty sure it was originally something LNP aimed to do that Labor then took up as fishing groups have been pressuring the government for it to happen long before 2014.
But its actually irrelevant the main point is it was supported by both Labor and LNP state governments but opposed by Greens, the very party that you would expect and think should be supporting such a move.
The netting was actually mostly about pilchard and sardine species that are a vital food source for not only Snapper & Gummy Shark but also other wildlife like penguins.
But maybe some Greens leaders didnt like the idea of not having local caught fresh sardines to to go with their smashed avo and latte's on Sunday mornings in some Chapel Street cafe.
False Info?
Off course.
BTW Andy serious question why don't you vote for the Greens?
Your views clearly seem to be very far left, very anti big business anti capitalism pro socialism, anti property investment ect.
Labor are still pretty pro these things, there's not a lot between the left factions of LNP and right faction of Labor, while Greens ideals seem pretty much what you seem to believe in.
I appreciate the honest question.
Short answer is I just don’t see how you can call yourself an environmental party without addressing the issue of population growth.
Not surprisingly it is a magnifier of pretty much any environmental issue you care to name.
The greens got wedged by Pauline Hanson and never got over it.
AndyM wrote:I appreciate the honest question.
Short answer is I just don’t see how you can call yourself an environmental party without addressing the issue of population growth.
Not surprisingly it is a magnifier of pretty much any environmental issue you care to name.
The greens got wedged by Pauline Hanson and never got over it.
Fair enough, cheers for the answer
Not sure if I should vote for UAP or One Nation one thing I know if the major parties will be last.
I think the cock and ball party will do well this year.
https://theunaustralian.net/2019/05/15/cock-and-balls-given-own-box-on-b...
This prick couldn’t lie straight in bed . https://twitter.com/kindpz/status/1520600881569628161?s=21&t=Je6ps38T8mc1g-Ql_IhTpg
.