The United States(!) of A

sypkan wrote:

I don't even know how they can possibly make the economics of such things work - tickets weren't that expensive

true believers, and for the love. pat todd said it costs him about 10 grand US to come to oz. he plays the frandiego traps for 6 months to fund 1 overseas trip per year. he thinks we are cool, so we get the joy. supporting bands is often about that. keeping aus a grateful destination. (I got a coupla freebies on the door for test tube babies on the 19th if you feel like a run into town @syp).

Hiccups wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

flollo wrote:

Burleigh, you’re spot on regarding this trans extremism. It needs to stop.

Please elaborate on this alleged "trans extremism". I haven't seen it personally. Seems like something made up by the same people that would've been scared of gay people in eras past, and probably still are tbh. wtf is trans extremism? lolol

Also, many drag queens aren't even trans. It's performance art, darling!

All I’m saying is there is absolutely no need for adult men dressing up as women and reading book to young children. What can’t you see the issue?

What about adult men dressed up as clowns. Is that ok?

That's not a very good comparison clowns have always been seen as entertainers of people of all ages and always focussed on kids.

I asked burleigh that so I could answer with some context about why clowns are historically wildly more dangerous to children than drag queens, which is why I had to make a more succinct post telling him to google Pogo the Clown.

Bro, drag queens are entertainers, and most entertainers enjoy entertaining kids. They're reading books, not simulating sex acts. I'm not into furries now cos I sat in Fat Cat's knee when I was five years old. Fucken loved Fat Cat too, me.

THIS.

southernraw wrote:

Seriously, what's wrong with you deviants?
I'm with Burleigh on this one.
Fark that shit!! Wt actual Fuck?

Oh jeezuz. You've turned sr. Don't tell me the trump thing pushed u over the edge

Hiccups wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

flollo wrote:

Burleigh, you’re spot on regarding this trans extremism. It needs to stop.

Please elaborate on this alleged "trans extremism". I haven't seen it personally. Seems like something made up by the same people that would've been scared of gay people in eras past, and probably still are tbh. wtf is trans extremism? lolol

Also, many drag queens aren't even trans. It's performance art, darling!

All I’m saying is there is absolutely no need for adult men dressing up as women and reading book to young children. What can’t you see the issue?

What about adult men dressed up as clowns. Is that ok?

That's not a very good comparison clowns have always been seen as entertainers of people of all ages and always focussed on kids.

I asked burleigh that so I could answer with some context about why clowns are historically wildly more dangerous to children than drag queens, which is why I had to make a more succinct post telling him to google Pogo the Clown.

Bro, drag queens are entertainers, and most entertainers enjoy entertaining kids. They're reading books, not simulating sex acts. I'm not into furries now cos I sat in Fat Cat's knee when I was five years old. Fucken loved Fat Cat too, me.

Adult entertainers.

Can you give any good reason why their shouldn't be topless women story time for kids?

indo-dreaming wrote:

Adult entertainers.

Not if there's no adult content. Then they're just blokes in fancy dress as exaggerated women. A story as old as time (probably).

indo-dreaming wrote:

Can you give any good reason why their shouldn't be topless women story time for kids?

Not really, but it's a false equivalence, isn't it.

Your favourite team the Liberal Party had to be pressured to allow breastfeeding in public, so I should hope that you don't wanna see a pair of cans anywhere except the sanctity of your bedroom, preferably with the lights off.

AND THIS. Nailed it Hiccups

southernraw wrote:

Seriously, what's wrong with you deviants?
I'm with Burleigh on this one.
Fark that shit!! Wt actual Fuck?

Southern, we’ve come to blows but also agreed on a lot of things. I respect you brother.

TimTam wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Hiccups wrote:

flollo wrote:

Burleigh, you’re spot on regarding this trans extremism. It needs to stop.

Please elaborate on this alleged "trans extremism". I haven't seen it personally. Seems like something made up by the same people that would've been scared of gay people in eras past, and probably still are tbh. wtf is trans extremism? lolol

Also, many drag queens aren't even trans. It's performance art, darling!

All I’m saying is there is absolutely no need for adult men dressing up as women and reading book to young children. What can’t you see the issue?

What about adult men dressed up as clowns. Is that ok?

That's not a very good comparison clowns have always been seen as entertainers of people of all ages and always focussed on kids.

I asked burleigh that so I could answer with some context about why clowns are historically wildly more dangerous to children than drag queens, which is why I had to make a more succinct post telling him to google Pogo the Clown.

Bro, drag queens are entertainers, and most entertainers enjoy entertaining kids. They're reading books, not simulating sex acts. I'm not into furries now cos I sat in Fat Cat's knee when I was five years old. Fucken loved Fat Cat too, me.

Adult entertainers.

Can you give any good reason why their shouldn't be topless women story time for kids?

indo-dreaming wrote:

Adult entertainers.

Not if there's no adult content. Then they're just blokes in fancy dress as exaggerated women. A story as old as time (probably).

indo-dreaming wrote:

Can you give any good reason why their shouldn't be topless women story time for kids?

Not really, but it's a false equivalence, isn't it.

Your favourite team the Liberal Party had to be pressured to allow breastfeeding in public, so I should hope that you don't wanna see a pair of cans anywhere except the sanctity of your bedroom, preferably with the lights off.

AND THIS. Nailed it Hiccups

Are you and hiccups the same moronic person? Surely 2 people on swellnet can’t be that cooked

Supafreak wrote:

Interesting story about Lady MAGA ……..,,,, Woods has also used his social media channels to echo the new conservative talking points against erstwhile allies. “Gays need to reclaim being JUST gay,” he tweeted last May. “We’re not ‘LGBTQIAXYZ’ groomers.” Recently Woods became an “ambassador” for Gays Against Groomers, a reactionary group that says it “opposes the sexualization and indoctrination of children,” which it claims includes “drag queen story hours”; “the transitioning and medicalization of minors”; and “gender theory being taught in the classroom.” https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/lady-maga-loneli.... Ladies & Gentlemen , introducing…………… Danny La Tramp

In August, 2019, Lady MAGA was born. “I am a political drag queen,” Woods announced. “I support President Trump, and I believe that together we can make America gay, I mean great again!”

velocityjohnno wrote:

Glad I got that in before the thread gets locked.

Haha. Nicely played. Bad Fat Cat!

TimTam wrote:

velocityjohnno wrote:

Glad I got that in before the thread gets locked.

Haha. Nicely played. Bad Fat Cat!

Word of advice timtam. Don’t let grown adult men dress up in women’s clothes, act like queens and read books to your kids. The world will be a better place.

And one for Indo, the most exciting part of the show:

burleigh wrote:

TimTam wrote:

velocityjohnno wrote:

Glad I got that in before the thread gets locked.

Haha. Nicely played. Bad Fat Cat!

Word of advice timtam. Don’t let grown adult men dress up in women’s clothes, act like queens and read books to your kids. The world will be a better place.

Honestly burley yr such a... well there's no adjective that really captures your stupidity.
Yeah man, they're grooming yr kids man, haven't you noticed yr boy wants to wear dresses all of a sudden?? You do realise that some kids have trouble identifying with genders for whatever reason. None of yr business, but if you don't like it keep yr kid away from it. Kid's main influence are the parents. Just be happy yr boy will grow up tough and ignorant and wearing pants like his old man.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_Queen_Story_Hour
The world is a complex place not some binary fantasyland where men are men blahblah. There's no black and white except in your blinkered vision. Grow up and accept difference. Don't let yr kid go to story hour... there all fixed for ya dopey.

didn't you call @burleigh a poof, @Tim, cos he says 'babe' in jest to @roadkill sometimes? Why do you need the @burleighs of this world to get onboard your/our particular train?

This thread has warped to this ?
Now realise why most contributors comment under pseudonym's & aliases.
Outta my depth amongst the majority & commend the minority in their plight to bring some balance. Too many Knockem Down Clowns & Whacka- Moles here. Anonymity has a lot to answer for. Flim Flam, employee of the month.

Bitcoin going to the moon . Musk going to mars . Shoot for the stars .

View this post on Instagram

View this post on Instagram

Stunet censoring again. Guess I'll come back again later. Cheers fascists.

Supafreak wrote:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C9fkecFurhX/?igsh=MTR5ODJ6MXpwczFybQ==

Classic

Funny. Everytime stunet censors he censors a post of rationality. What's the problem stunet? Don't like free speech when it's reasonable?