The United States(!) of A

Reckon you've reached your video limit, JF.

Yes. Boss ;)
- (your limit haha)

…shall we take it to the polls?

;);)

Jelly Flater wrote:

…shall we take it to the polls?

;);)

Think you're mistaking this place for a democracy.

- yaaaah & yeeeee haaaaa ;)

https://www.270towin.com/

… just gotta peel away the layers, mein fuhrer ;);)

https://theonion.com/

Good morning SN, is @info the video links monitor these days just like the old primary school chalk and dust board monitor? Geez at my school those social misfits were unceremoniously called arse lickers or suck holes!

… haha
- some ppl like cloud break ;)

…and some get the ‘cb’ confused
- & go all in with a 10 on censorship bureau instead ;);)

Jelly Flater wrote:

… haha
- some ppl like cloud break ;)

…and some get the ‘cb’ confused
- & go all in with a 10 on censorship bureau instead ;);)

Haha. So true. Stunet rules his little kingdom with an iron fist! Dictatorial and censorial. I know a guy who got turfed for criticising Tim Bonython. He wrote a msg about free speech and got banned!! I guess it'll be my turn next. Don't upset Stunet.

TimTam wrote:

Jelly Flater wrote:

… haha
- some ppl like cloud break ;)

…and some get the ‘cb’ confused
- & go all in with a 10 on censorship bureau instead ;);)

Haha. So true. Stunet rules his little kingdom with an iron fist! Dictatorial and censorial. I know a guy who got turfed for criticising Tim Bonython. He wrote a msg about free speech and got banned!! I guess it'll be my turn next. Don't upset Stunet.

"I know a guy"

ha ha ha

stunet wrote:

Jelly Flater wrote:

…shall we take it to the polls?

;);)

Think you're mistaking this place for a democracy.

Ya gotta admit JF , stunet’s reply was pretty funny. I watch some of your clips and they can be very entertaining but I’ve said before that there’s way too many to watch them all . I do appreciate your input however. I’m also curious as indo said earlier that you posted 15 pointless videos. For him to know that they were pointless , would imply that he watches them . Who would have thought that your biggest audience for your videos was indo ?

SN forums have the coolest, most tolerant, easy-going mods on the net.
Some of the clowns around here wouldn't last 5 seconds on a normal public forum like Whirlpool.
Now all Seig Heil Mein Stunet.

^ it’s true ;)

- and @supa, yes stu is always quick witted and fair
(he also doesn’t like wabbit emojis but likes the wabbit stew style thump thump thump of sinkers clanging upon gromsies heads, in good faith of course)

& the noinfo thing ….haha, it’s all gerbil hysteria ;);)

….carry on ;)

- oh vait hang on juzt z minute!
…almozt vorgot zumzinggg ;)

Z encore!!
- lazt pointlezz offewing evaaaa ;)

Itz z biggezt eva, nobody knew or even heard aboutz zis evaaa!
…itz gonna b ummm …I don’t sink anyvun eva seen zumzing zo big ;);)

- like arnold palmer big
…. iz huge ;)

https://m.

https://m.

stunet wrote:

TimTam wrote:

Jelly Flater wrote:

… haha
- some ppl like cloud break ;)

…and some get the ‘cb’ confused
- & go all in with a 10 on censorship bureau instead ;);)

Haha. So true. Stunet rules his little kingdom with an iron fist! Dictatorial and censorial. I know a guy who got turfed for criticising Tim Bonython. He wrote a msg about free speech and got banned!! I guess it'll be my turn next. Don't upset Stunet.

"I know a guy"

ha ha ha

Yeah he was pretty pissed off! Sorry am i allowed to swear? But he reckons he understands that stu may have been one of those kids that got bullied at school... like the chalk monitor. But now...ah... but now

More vids from jellybrain.

Pushing it to go out in a blaze of perceived glory?

Yeehaa jelly. Keep em coming.

Supafreak wrote:

stunet wrote:

Jelly Flater wrote:

…shall we take it to the polls?

;);)

Think you're mistaking this place for a democracy.

Ya gotta admit JF , stunet’s reply was pretty funny. I watch some of your clips and they can be very entertaining but I’ve said before that there’s way too many to watch them all . I do appreciate your input however. I’m also curious as indo said earlier that you posted 15 pointless videos. For him to know that they were pointless , would imply that he watches them . Who would have thought that your biggest audience for your videos was indo ?

No need to watch Jelly YouTube posts to know they are pointless. If he posts, it’s pointless.

- haha pipe down and put the pipe down toady ;)
… how bout a jihad death vid or a donny ali g ice cream glove clip ay

& what are u here for again haha
… to keep pushing ya perceived glory hole back in ;);)

- carry on ;)

https://m.

- there is no point to anything from u dill ;)
…you’re trying to make a point by pointing perceived stuff out

You’re not really on point at all ay toady ;)
- but hey… being as sharp as a bowling ball… well…

Carry on ;);)

- haha grab ya pointless shovel toady and dig ;)

… bon jovi bs youtube? (still ronery)

- “ accuse the other side of that which you are guilty"

;);)

Yeah, nah.

1 vid per day vs 10+ vids per day.

Isn’t a comparison.

Ps. Bowling ball?, heard that so many times I think you are running out of crap to post. Please try harder and bring originality back.

Make originality great again. MOGA.

^ pointless perceived comparisons

- carry on tho ronery boy ;)

^^ hahaha yes …ummm …originality haha

“What we know is…we don’t know who will win.”

Oh yeah ;)
- don’t try too hard hahaha

… carry on ;);)

… hop along now toady ;)
- haha, make toady hop again

;);)

indo-dreaming wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Polls are irrelevant, Trump will win 100%. Anyone that think Kamala has a chance needs their head checked.

We also need a Trump here in Aus.

I like your optimism, i hope he wins, but im going to be surprised if he does.

I just think the male vs female split is an issue, i think women will be motivated to turn out vote and men wont be as much, esopecially younger men that Trump has some popularity with

But really who knows.

So @burleigh, and @indo, you both support banning abortion??
There's no way you don't if you support this neanderthal.

Joes officially on the Trump train.

"Joe Rogan endorses Trump on eve of the election"

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/joe-rogan-trump-endorsement/...

southernraw wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Polls are irrelevant, Trump will win 100%. Anyone that think Kamala has a chance needs their head checked.

We also need a Trump here in Aus.

I like your optimism, i hope he wins, but im going to be surprised if he does.

I just think the male vs female split is an issue, i think women will be motivated to turn out vote and men wont be as much, esopecially younger men that Trump has some popularity with

But really who knows.

So @burleigh, and @indo, you both support banning abortion??
There's no way you don't if you support this neanderthal.

No i dont support banning abortion.

But Republicans stance or policy is not to ban abortion, it's to let states decide what their regulation's are, it's really not that unreasonable as USA is so vast, the views of people in California or New York are very different to somewhere very regional.

BTW. Just because people support a party or candidate doesn't mean you agree with ALL their policies/views and sometimes you even agree with some of the oppositions.

indo-dreaming wrote:

southernraw wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Polls are irrelevant, Trump will win 100%. Anyone that think Kamala has a chance needs their head checked.

We also need a Trump here in Aus.

I like your optimism, i hope he wins, but im going to be surprised if he does.

I just think the male vs female split is an issue, i think women will be motivated to turn out vote and men wont be as much, esopecially younger men that Trump has some popularity with

But really who knows.

So @burleigh, and @indo, you both support banning abortion??
There's no way you don't if you support this neanderthal.

No i dont support banning abortion.

But Republicans stance or policy is not to ban abortion, it's to let states decide what their regulation's are, it's really not that unreasonable as USA is so vast, the views of people in California or New York are very different to somewhere very regional.

BTW. Just because people support a party or candidate doesn't mean you agree with all policies etc.

Indo, along the same lines, how do you rationalise that supporting Trump is supporting a convicted sexual abuser/rapist?

I can’t get my head around how people are happy to support Trump whilst knowing he is a sexual abuser.

Fair enough indo.
Was wondering how that could sit comfortably with anyone, especially with daughters.
I think oz is similar yeah. Different states ban it etc?
Can't say we're any better in that respect if that's the case.