The United States(!) of A
burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:SD - the rape case (civil) is separate to the stormy Daniel’s campaign violation (criminal) case. Which is separate to the classified documents case. And the other cases.
If that helps.
Plenty of rea$ons to have a civil case. 83.3 million of them actually.
What are all 12 complainants going to have
a class action against Trump ?
Juliang wrote:If Trump gives Ukraine to Putin, as he’s hinting , That will embolden Putin to take other
NATO countries, because he knows Trump
might not stop him,
there’s the 3rd world war scenario ,
Which Trump projected onto Kamala !
What a crock of shit.
The US violated agreements on NATO expansion and staged a coupe of a democratically elected government and installed a puppet government. Geez mate catch up.
Juliang wrote:If Trump gives Ukraine to Putin, as he’s hinting , That will embolden Putin to take other
NATO countries, because he knows Trump
might not stop him,
there’s the 3rd world war scenario ,
Which Trump projected onto Kamala !
What a crock of shit.
The US violated agreements on NATO expansion and staged a coupe of a democratically elected government and installed a puppet government. Geez mate catch up.
Sorry, triple banged it.
@ soggy dog
Well Trump says he can stop the Ukraine war in a very short period of time., but wouldn’t say how .So I know you’re a trusting guy,
but who knows what he’s going to do ?
But hopefully if enough people can understand the 164 pages of new damning
evidence released Today , on the Jan 6 insurrection, we won’t have to worry about it.
Juliang wrote:burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:SD - the rape case (civil) is separate to the stormy Daniel’s campaign violation (criminal) case. Which is separate to the classified documents case. And the other cases.
If that helps.
Plenty of rea$ons to have a civil case. 83.3 million of them actually.
What are all 12 complainants going to have
a class action against Trump ?
you changed the number. LMAO
@ Burleigh
Yeah I changed the number , At least
I know when I’m wrong
Which you guys never do , against all odds .
burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:Pop Down wrote:Thanks etarip
At least you confirm Trump wasn't a Rapist . .
Trump has been judged by a jury of his peers, in his home state, to have raped Jean E Carroll. Not sure how you interpret that any other way.
.Why did she need 83 million dollars from him 28 year later at 80 years old?
I dunno mate, but that’s kind of irrelevant to the adjudication that Trump raped the complainant.
etarip wrote:burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:Pop Down wrote:Thanks etarip
At least you confirm Trump wasn't a Rapist . .
Trump has been judged by a jury of his peers, in his home state, to have raped Jean E Carroll. Not sure how you interpret that any other way.
.Why did she need 83 million dollars from him 28 year later at 80 years old?
I dunno mate, but that’s kind of irrelevant to the adjudication that Trump raped the complainant.
I was just curious what a book writer that wrote a book about trump in 2019 would need 83.3 million dollars at 80 years old.
An inquisitive mind is a healthy mind.
But do we agree that the motivation of the complainant or the amount awarded, (which was determined by the judge), is irrelevant to the question of whether Trump was found by a jury, on the basis of probability, to have committed the act in question?
etarip wrote:An inquisitive mind is a healthy mind.
But do we agree that the motivation of the complainant or the amount awarded, (which was determined by the judge), is irrelevant to the question of whether Trump was found by a jury, on the basis of probability, to have committed the act in question?
I don't know the case. The mind does wonder thinking about the money, timing and the motivation behind this assault from 28 years ago. Which of course Trump has denied the entire time. What evidence did they present to the jury?
soggydog wrote:Sorry, triple banged it.
was worthy of a triple bang for emphasis...
ukraine: one of the most corrupt and corrupted places on earth - NATO and nuland have a lot to answer for...
trump seems to be wisely pragmatic about it all
apparently he told zelensky he won't desert them anyway...
a different approach to the current blinded by ideology war pigs would be a good start
anyone who wants to comment on ukraine should watch oliver stone's 'Ukraine Is On Fire'
otherwise... ya just a bit bloody ignorant to be frank...
burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:An inquisitive mind is a healthy mind.
But do we agree that the motivation of the complainant or the amount awarded, (which was determined by the judge), is irrelevant to the question of whether Trump was found by a jury, on the basis of probability, to have committed the act in question?
I don't know the case. The mind does wonder thinking about the money, timing and the motivation behind this assault from 28 years ago. Which of course Trump has denied the entire time. What evidence did they present to the jury?
What evidence did they present? Enough for the jury to adjudicate that the incident occurred.
You don’t know the details of the case, but you know the payout and you make inferences about the motivation? Curious.
etarip wrote:burleigh wrote:etarip wrote:An inquisitive mind is a healthy mind.
But do we agree that the motivation of the complainant or the amount awarded, (which was determined by the judge), is irrelevant to the question of whether Trump was found by a jury, on the basis of probability, to have committed the act in question?
I don't know the case. The mind does wonder thinking about the money, timing and the motivation behind this assault from 28 years ago. Which of course Trump has denied the entire time. What evidence did they present to the jury?
What evidence did they present? Enough for the jury to adjudicate that the incident occurred.
You don’t know the details of the case, but you know the payout and you make inferences about the motivation? Curious.
You're right. I'm very curious. 83.3 million times curious. Did they have any physical proof or just someones word against another + her journalist friends.
sypkan][quote=soggydog wrote:Sorry, triple banged it.
was worthy of a triple bang for emphasis...
ukraine: one of the most corrupt and corrupted places on earth - NATO and nuland have a lot to answer for...
trump seems to be wisely pragmatic about it all
apparently he told zelensky he won't desert them anyway...
a different approach to the current blinded by ideology war pigs would be a good start
anyone who wants to comment on ukraine should watch oliver stone's 'Ukraine Is On Fire'
otherwise... ya just a bit bloody ignorant to be frank...[/quote}
Great doco Syp.
Surf trip read has been CHAOS by Tom O’niel. Three letter agencies and Charles Manson. Worth a look.
Septic Tanks are going to Septic Tank