And parallel to 'the code' that guides this thread, also runs a more authoritative view: that of the sovereign views whose iterations propound the law of the 'land and sea Country' on which the video is set.
In respect to their Country: I Acknowledge their Country. I Acknowledge their Elders past and present. I Acknowledge that they never ceded their sovereignty, as well as the ongoing trajectory of the Crown - which is the source of ongoing harm.

This is not to discount the basis for which my comment was delete - as someone who appreciates 'the code' I agree that that was the correct response. Thank you Stu. My intention here is to acknowledge the context in which the code sit within, and that is, it is subordinate to - not necessarily aligned or misaligned to - whose ever Country it is being applied. And also to take responsibility and hopefully make good.

In summary: a perceivable breach of the code, including the code itself - as well as all non-First Nations claims to localism- in my view, benefits from also acknowledging the sovereign reality in which it sits: the reality of the illegal occupation of sovereign lands by the Crown.

I would add, that the source of 'the code' on which the removal of my comment was correctly based, is not a source which emanates completely from the Crown, though is probably substantially an extension of the Crown. Nethertheless, in some ways the code could be viewed to seek to override the Crowns' dominion, for example when "locals" bash a blowin.

Constitutional recognition via the Voice is the recognition by the Crown on the basis of the expressed will of the body politic- via the referendum. What is the Crown recognising? That First Nations sovereignty **pre-dates the sovereignty of the Crown. Which is probably why white supremacists, consciously or otherwise, hate the idea- as its an attack to their perceived supremacy.

Sincerely, my apologies for my lack of discretion, and thank you again Stu for removing it.

**Mabo 2 severed the legal limb of the Crowns soveriengty by propounding that terra nullis was a lie. When the High Court did that, it severed the legal limb of the Crowns sovereignty, however obviously the consent of, and the aquiessence by, the people to the dominion of the Crown supports the current political limb of Crown's sovereignty. Again noting it's legal limb was severed.