Australia Uber Alles

Border Force, fuck yeah!

.

Sheepdog wrote:

I hope welly has his visa up to date, sypo.... Back to raglan you go, sunshine ;)

Racist pieces of fuks;)

Hey Rgas rocks tho, more consistent than any wave here in OZ

Go fuck yourself in SA Sheepio

there you go aussie culture bashers, we're not all the racist hethans some of you think we are.

even the border forces'own union are calling abbott and co. out for a step too far...way too far

one good thing about a conservative government is you get a little anarchy in the streets

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/aug/29/coalition-says-bor...

nice pic there sheepdog, literally cracked up laughing

You have to be sick, when you have a fascination with turds Sheepio :-)

Hilarious! 'Brenda the civil disobedience penguin' ... Hahaha!

a brotherly adjunct, SD

http://www.theage.com.au/comment/martin-flanagan-how-we-see-ourselves-di...

they all know nussink

Fear not Shats Herr Morrison is waiting in the wings should Abbott's boss Rupert decide it's time for a change.

Internal Border 'protectors' are a concern, especially when refugees have a right to come here. Change is a part of life, more refugees will inevitably come. We have to make sure they have safe places to stay when they do come. I have relatives in France (30kms from Paris) they have people sleeping in tents and humppies in shopping centre carparks and under bridges, which is less than ideal. If the infrastructures are not in place things may get a little messy. If it does get messy, public consensus may well support random ID checks

I really don't get this border force thing, the name is particularly aggressive, the uniforms nazi like, and the purpose? nonexistent.

if the goal is to clamp down on people with dodgy visas, I would think the majority of these would be backpacker types overstaying their visa or a student clocking up too many work hours. these issues would be more efficiently addressed with computer or work place checks.

anyone who has rufugee status has a visa of sorts, temporary or whatever. and is allowed to be here, stopping tbem in the streets makes no sense at all

this all seems like a show, for what purpose I do not know. liberal voters might like it but they don't need winning over. anyone with enough social intelligence and half a clue about how people think could tell the government this would be most unpalatable to the people thay are trying to get to vote for them. are the whole liberal party that autistic that no one stood up and said 'hey this ain't such a good idea'. I cannot believe for a minute that someone as smart as turnball would have supported this, which shows this must be another 'captains pick' (I thought they were done with them), seriously abbott has to be the most autistic cunt on the planet.

the government is clearly in damage control about tbe press release and back peddling, but as was pointed out in that article, if its just a badly worded press release surely the operation would continue.

I'd love ro hear what that suppository of all wisdom for the labor party thinks...member tonybarber your thoughts ?

Sypo take it easy on autistic poeple and c#@ts mate they don't deserve to be slurred with the abbot t shame.

Good onya sheepy, unreal that people will support their governments illegally bombing foriegners but won't take any sympathy when said folks have to flee said bombing. Lybia isn't twice as bad as it was under Gaddafi it is now a failed state, a wasteland, America and Allies have laid to waste the jewel of Africa. The most successful of the north african countries. Gaddafi was a great man despite what the western media would have you believe and we are expected to believe the same propaganda against bashar. Lybians loved Gaddafi, why....http://disinfo.com/2011/10/16-things-libya-will-never-see-again/

you re right manbat cunts and the socially challenged don't deserve the abbott slur but I have no other words to describe him...nothing fits how did this nutjob become prime minister? it defys logic.and even if he is as autistic as he seems,where are his advisors? pretty sure wwe're all paying millions for 'experts' to advise him.

the whole border force thing really puzzles me, tonybarber please clear it up for me, give us the inner workings, it all can't possibly be as contrived and incompetent as it seems

I remember when the first round of warmongering about Syria was happening and yeah rudd was chapping at the bit to back the US after the NATO chemical weapons scam, Abbott wasn't supportive of the action. Its just so cynical, when in power bombs away, easy votes who cares if someone is dying at the other end of the policy.

Sheepo I'm glad you pointed out the 'slick black stuff' funny isn't it how dozens of despotic psychopaths have been left to do their worst (pol pot, idi amin blah blah) but only if the territory has no value to the US. I'm not saying Gaddafi was an angel, I didn't know the guy but he is no worse than any of the leaders of day America, we've just been told that he was, unfortunately the proof is in the pudding, lybia was a far greater success than the crumbling nations that have destroyed her. Free housing, free education, free healthcare, can you believe that? Imagine what a great country this would have been to live in, no wonder the lybians loved him. When was the last time you saw an American president driving through the streets without the protection of bulletproof glass?

The slick black stuff, pan africanism, the dinar and refusing to capitulate to the lies and underhand dealings of the UN and the US is what got him murdered

Sheepdog wrote:

prothero wrote:

Internal Border 'protectors' are a concern, especially when refugees have a right to come here. Change is a part of life, more refugees will inevitably come. We have to make sure they have safe places to stay when they do come. I have relatives in France (30kms from Paris) they have people sleeping in tents and humppies in shopping centre carparks and under bridges, which is less than ideal. If the infrastructures are not in place things may get a little messy. If it does get messy, public consensus may well support random ID checks

And most of those currently making there way to France, Mate? From Libya??... Why would that be? Would it be because it was France who pushed the U.N for permission (which was granted) to bomb the fuck out of the place and therefore get gadaffi killed, and have a muslim brotherhood government installed? And now Libya is twice a bad then what it was under Gadaffi? France, England etc have a moral duty... You bomb the fuck out of somewhere, you install an even more evil regime, well then you wear it.... Same deal goes for Iraq and now Syria.... If we keep bombing and causing instability just so we can keep our hands on the oil, then we gotta wear it.....
As Jello Biafra would say... "Dog bite, on my leg.... Not right, supposed to beg"....

Libyans ?.....nah Sheepdog....my Father in law gets food from the supermarkets in Paris and gives it out to people who need it....lots of eastern Europeans, Afgans, Pakistanis, North Africans , Iraqis and Syrians. Are the people heading to England/France because they were complicate in fucking up their countries ? Germany and Sweden take a shit load more refugees than England and France and they were not bombing the fuc out of people . What do England, France, Sweden and Germany have in common ?..... A welfare safety net.

Nice read Sheepdog thanks, I like lots of pictures, Yes you are spot on Libya is in North Africa. Apparently the eastern Europeans are coming from Albania and Romania

prothero wrote:

Libyans ?.....nah Sheepdog....my Father in law gets food from the supermarkets in Paris and gives it out to people who need it....lots of eastern Europeans, Afgans, Pakistanis, North Africans , Iraqis and Syrians. Are the people heading to England/France because they were complicate in fucking up their countries ? Germany and Sweden take a shit load more refugees than England and France and they were not bombing the fuc out of people . What do England, France, Sweden and Germany have in common ?..... A welfare safety net.

I'm not sure if you are implying that refugees select their destination based on the welfare opportunities of the destination countries but if you are the research tells a different story, here are some findings from a 2013 study -

There is a growing body of research (albeit largely from outside Australia) into the issue of asylum destination choice–that is, the extent to which asylum seekers are able to exercise choice when it comes to their destination country, and their reasons for choosing certain countries over others.
This research reveals a number of common themes, chief among them being that asylum seekers generally have limited options available to them, and choices are made within a very narrow field of possibilities. Their choices and their journeys are often strongly influenced by the people smugglers, or agents, they engage to assist them.
Where asylum seekers are able to exercise choice in determining their destination country, factors such as the presence of social networks, historical ties between the countries of origin and destination, and the knowledge or belief that a certain country is democratic, where human rights and the rule of law are likely to be respected, are highly influential.
Policies and processes relating to the asylum procedure in destination countries are generally not well known and therefore not highly significant in influencing choice of destination. This represents a major challenge for governments which are attempting to curb flows of asylum seekers through changes to asylum policy

Sheepdog wrote:

Manbat... I think a very small % are moving for "welfare".... A tiny amount.... I'm sitting at a outdoor rubble surrounded cafe in Tikrit, iraq.... I car bomb detonates.... As bits a human fly around me, and the shrill screams of pain fill the air, I look at my Iphone, and think "hey, look at this!! I might take a 6000km journey via Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, onto Indonesia, stay there for 2 years eating stale rice, and then get on a rickety boat and relocate to melbourne so i can get welfare...... I continue to drink my coffee, and then notice it's time to go to the mosque... I push the bodyparts out the way, and off I walk......

SD...it comes down to an individuals right to choose peace...to live in peace and to let others live in the same level of peace.

I just spent two weeks staying with my 90yr old German grandmother...a very interesting time to reconnect with her, especially in the current political climate...she may be old and blind but she's still got a full deck of cards.
She and her family left Germany in 1956 for one reason, and one reason only....to live in a country of peace. On average Europe and surrounds would be at war every 20yrs, and that is what the family wanted to escape. They were financially well off in Germany, and even knowing that the wealth would not be properly fulfilled in Australia, the choice was an easy one to make...leave a continent in almost perpetual war and live for peace.

What's really interesting and even scarier are stories she has of living in Nazi Germany and how close to the wind Abbott is sailing down the same path.

Transfield Services appears set to continue running the Manus Island and Nauru facilities for another five years, after being announced as the government’s preferred tenderer to run “welfare and garrison support services” offshore.

The total five-year contract could be worth about $2.7bn, about $45m every month.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/31/transfield-named-coalitions...

Interesting comment:

Halliburton did well after Cheney left its management to become Vice President.

Transfield does well after Tony Shepherd leaves its management to head up the Abbott government's Commission of Audit.

Transfield services ...........'Ndrangheta.

Udo I think you misspelt bunchacunce

"Remember when 'Sweaty' Joe Hockey was always banging on and on about Labor's debt and deficit disaster? Well, as of last Friday, 28 August 2015, gross government debt was $384.7 billion – the highest level ever recorded. This represents an increase of $111 billion from the level inherited by the Abbott government in September 2013.

Transfield has been providing services on Nauru, which has 637 asylum seekers, since September 2012, and on Manus Island since early 2014. Its existing $2.2 billion contract with the Department of Immigration for both centres will expire on October 31. Despite the many incidents and reports criticising the running of the detention camps, Transfield has just been awarded a further five year contract. The announcement saw Transfield shares rise by 9%.

Tony Shepherd, the head of Abbott’s Commission of Audit, was chairman of Transfield and had spent over a decade on the board, quitting only in October 2013 to take up the job as Commissioner.

Mr Shepherd left with more than 200,000 Transfield shares, allocated to his family superannuation fund, on top of his final salary of $380,000.

In a move strikingly similar to Dyson Heydon judging himself, Treasurer Joe Hockey and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann left it up to the audit commissioners to rule on potential conflicts of interest among themselves.

Shepherd now heads the WestConnex Delivery Authority which will award contracts to build the proposed Sydney toll road, co-funded by the Abbott government. He is also a director of the international arm of Virgin Australia.

Not that I am suggesting anything untoward in this tight knit circle."

http://theaimn.com/transfield-shares-go-up-and-so-does-the-debt/

“Mates help each other, they do not tax each other.” – Tony Abbott, February 23, 2011.

Hmmmmmmm. Very interesting having a fascination with turds now you're actually calling someone shats...!
Classic;-)

War is a nasty piece of work isn’t it. Old school tactics would be to take out major infrastructure to cripple the enemy i.e., power stations, bridges, ports, main thorough ways, refineries, airports etc.

These days the focus is on protecting these points. Let’s face it! What’s the point in taking over a country if you destroy its infrastructure/profitability? It is much better to focus on displacing population as a weapon to fulfill and end game.

Displace millions of people who have nothing more than survival as their main motivation puts enormous pressure on government infrastructure around the world, way beyond what most countries have planned for in their fiscal projection. As a tactic by your enemy you would need to balance your money between defense, immigration & your countries financial sustainability.
In this respect global warming will take a back seat, the priority will become about refugees, boat people, asylum seekers, Que jumpers, over stayers, and white south Africans who couldn’t handle majority rule government.

So here it is the conundrum! Do we pour billions into the war machine & border security globally or do we help those who need your help.

If we help those people, they may help us.

hey sheepdog, go easy on Elizabeth mate!

what a fucken dog of a couple...shameless!

full credit to the judge, finally one from the 'other half' get a decent sentence

Sheepdog wrote:

"wife of wealthy mining executive, jailed over $62,000 Centrelink fraud"..........

But where's the outrage from Grocer? Nick? Barley? Blowin?
Ohh... That's right.... She's not an illegal... She's not from Logan, or Werribee, or Elizabeth, or western Sydney....
She got what she deserved.....
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-02/wife-of-mining-executive-jailed-ov...

Why do you think I wouldn't be outraged ?