Castles in the Sky
Stuart Nettle July 29, 2010
When Taylor Steele's first film, Momentum, came out it was a smash hit. Steele's recipe for the movie was simple: whack a bunch of hot surfers together, film them, and cut it to a thrash soundtrack. He followed it up a few years later with Momentum 2, where he filmed the same surfers, played the same music, but changed the settings a bit.
Last night I went to see Castles in the Sky, Steele's follow up to his last smash hit, Sipping Jetstreams. The start wasn't at all promising, beginning as it did, with the most hackneyed of introductory tools: the Count Down.
14 surfers. 6 countries 4 cameras 1 film
Errgh....still, I dug deep and found the tolerance to press on and really enjoyed the first ten minutes. This was a prologue and consisted of a raw 'behind the scenes' look at the film and how it was made. People on the screen talked and they interacted with the locals amongst whom they were travelling.
And then the movie began and it was off to the unlikely surf destination of Norway...
Now, rather than give a blow by blow account let me chime in with a few observations. It was 44 years ago that Mike Hynson exclaimed, in Endless Summer, 'We're in Africa!' and so began a trend of surfers travelling to unlikely surf destinations and admitting just how absurd the notion is.
This is a trend that still continues and Steele has picked up on it. Sipping Jetstreams ventured to: Cuba, Morocco, Barbados, Hong Kong, all improbable surf destinations. Yet just sending famous surfers to unlikely places is not a trend that can continue. For one, the world is shrinking, there aren't many of these destinations left. What about the Sea of Tranquility, does it have waves? Better look into it.
The second reason is, well, that was the formula for Sipping Jetstreams. Retaining the same blueprint but changing the backdrops just doesn't cut it anymore. It didn't cut it for Momentum 2 and it doesn't cut it now.
Perhaps if Steele employed a formula whereby people actually spoke on screen, and surfers actually engaged with locals, then the films might have flavours that set them apart. But this doesn't happen. Besides a five line mantra that is repeated a few times no-one speaks in the film. I even had to wait for the credits to see who surfed in each section. Taylor and his writers seem unwilling (or unable) to establish a narrative and by leaving this element bare there was nothing for this viewer to engage with.
Until Rasta comes along that is. Not that he talks mind you, but his surfing was the one thing that stopped me from slumbering. A session of his in an Indian beachbreak is a major highlight. So fluid, yet so powerful. I'm sure there's a Chinese proverb about water being soft yet powerful. I should look it up. It would apply to Rasta.
So there it is, my review on Castles in the Sky.
500 words 60 minutes 2 coffees 1 opinion
Comments
Now go back 12 months Stu and review the pitiful Drifter movie. Nah, shit, don't bother! Wouldn't want to put you through the pain. Apart from a small section of Rob Machado actually surfing, and well I might add, the whole staged scene's where utterly wrenching to watch. I'll send you my very expensive copy!
Fuck me Mr. Steele! Pull your head out of your arse and perhaps take a leaf out of Thomas Campbell's book and get back to basics.
The much anticipated Castles seemed to leave everyone rushing to get back to the bar! No interaction between the life forms featured failed to capture the audiences attention. I can imagine the length of time editing such a film but I just felt like someone else had done all the hard work here. With the names of some of the largest companies behind it (financially) all I was able to think was Sipping..ok good prologue what's next, Drifter? what...., is this a surf film or mockumentary? Now this? a continuation of Sipping? The first wasn't all that good anyways..why do another one exactly the same? I think the name Taylor Steele has sold many more copies of films than the worthiness of the actual specimen.
I agree, Thomas Campbell at least brings the audience in, to share in the experience. All I get with TS films is a ticket to watch while they go around the world surfing in unexpected locations. eh.....
The emperor wears no clothes. Never has. The emperor has always ridden on the coat tails of Kelly Slater and Rob Machado.
But just you watch the surf industry fawn over him.
Strong start, but disappointing finish Spleen.
"But just you watch the surf industry compliment his latest outfit" would've been more penetrating, no?
Agree with Spleen, the Emperor hasn't worn clothes for a while. Full props to Taylor for revolutionising surf films in the 1990s.
But as the budgets went up (The Show etc) the quality barely changed. Some of those between-segment clips were embarrassing to watch then and even more dated now.
Haven't seen Castles yet but with Sipping I just didn't know what the man was trying to say with his film. It's all a bit honky getting highly paid pro surfers to enlighten us by travelling the developing world. Who are these people they film? What do they like? What do they think of the surfers? Give us something!
Shame the surf media hasn't looked at his films with a critical eye for some time - or if ever. It might have pushed him to improve.
Castles in the Sky is NOT a travelogue, as Mr Steele would have you believe. Taylor Steele is a tourist not a traveller. Typically he doesn't interact with locals, records things from a distance and buys a postcard. Only difference is Mr Steele bores everyone with the loungeroom-grade home videos he makes.