Coastal Creationism - Part 3: The good, the bad and the ugly of coasts
Why do some sections of coast just never really fire?
The last few articles have talked about how rare perfect surfing reefs are. We've looked at important shapes that can make a reef epic with regards to the wave climate. We're now going to relate this to geology of the local rock and the geomorphology of the coastal environment and how this can translate in to awesome setups - or not!
I write this article from Red Bluff on Western Australia's North West Coast. The vision in front of me is special, the wave set up almost perfect. The setting is incomparable with an idyllic beach, azure waters, and limestone cliffs all drawing attention toward the point. The herd of goats wandering the arid limestone crags behind me makes for a very Old World feel, like I'm in Morocco or the Mediterranean.
Having driven thousands of kilometres to get here, we know that there is a awful lot of coast that is simply not productive when it comes to surf set ups. Yet when the factors come together you can get world class waves clustered together a virtual stones throw apart. Amongst hundreds of kilometres of Ningaloo Reef, it is rarely acknowledged that it is about 6 - 7 hours drive between recognised, reliable, and quality surfing reefs at North West Cape and the Quobba/Gnarloo region. The point being that good surfing set ups don't just depend on a coral reef or a limestone coast, a whole bunch of factors have to come together to make the magic.
This is equally true on Australia's east coast where most of the photos in the magazines, web clips, and surf films are shot on a few short sections of coastline. Think the points of the southern Gold Coast, the points and reefs of Byron to Ballina, the rock shelves of Sydney, and the reefs and slabs of the South Coast.
We know these sections of coast pump, but what about those long sections of coast in between? Why are there no world class waves recognised south of Batemans Bay? Why is Port Stephens usually forgotten as a surf destination? The Mid North Coast has a couple of slow point breaks, but does it get really epic?
I believe that the reason these coasts underwhelm is mainly due to the alignment of the coastal geography and the underlying geology. Those underwhelming coasts suffer from geology that is just not aligned or disposed to forming those perfect lozenges of convex reef aligned at favourable peel angles into the prevailing swells.
Now, before any locals decide they hate me for deriding their home breaks, I am not saying they don’t get waves. They just don’t get world class waves with any regularity. Considering the expense and effort that surfers will go to chasing world class waves, being a coast that gets good, yet slips below the radar of the surf media, is probably a very good thing. Just ask the Gold Coast locals or the Balinese how they feel about sharing waves with an endless horde of travelling surfers.
As mentioned in earlier articles, to get perfect reefs you need a lot of important factors to come together. To summarise the goodness, we need at least five important features to align before there is any chance of a world class wave, these are:
- Coastal features aligned at a good angle to the prevailing swells to create an optimum peel angle.
- Coastal topography aligned at favourable angles to prevailing winds so as to maximise offshore and minimise onshore winds.
- Geology of coastal rocks that will form convex lozenges of reef aligned at good peel angles to the prevailing swells.
- Geology of coastal rocks that are not vertical, perpendicular or too blocky, thickly bedded or otherwise chunky that would interrupt the formation of good reef gradients.
- Offshore coastal geology and features that create favourable seafloor contours so as to lens prevailing swells on to the reef at good amplitude and peel angles.
Lastly, a coastline slightly oblique to the main swell train is also very helpful. A distant cape can help straighten and sort out swells as they approach the coast (eg: The Victorian Surf Coast benefits as the swell bends around Cape Otway).
Let's look at points one and two a bit more closely: the alignment of coastal features with respect to swell and winds. In later articles we will examine the importance of geology in reef shape and the offshore topography.
Firstly, the alignment of coastal features to the prevailing swells. On the east coast of Australia we love our north-facing points as they tend to take the prevailing south-east through to east swells and turn them into long pointbreak waves. It's all about the peel angle! In general, east coast points don't like acute south swells because they don't wrap and peel at a good angle. However rare south-east groundswells bring a lot of smiles because epic, solid, and long rides often ensue. The same applies for east swells, especially for Queensland points that don't get south-east swell.
Unfortunately north-east swell is is a bit more problematic as many points will shut down as the peel angle becomes too acute. Thankfully east through to south-east is the prevailing wave climate for most east coast point breaks. The same applies on the west coast except as a mirror reflection: Red Bluff and Gnarloo are north-facing points allowing a favourable alignment to the prevailing south-west groundswells. The swell wraps onto the reef with little loss of energy and then peels evenly down the headland at an angle optimum to the shape of the reef. The result at both Red Bluff and Gnaraloo are steep and fast waves.
Secondly, the alignment of coastal features is important in the way it affects the wind. On the east coast of Australia we love the fact that most pointbreaks face north, so they are largely tucked out of the prevailing southerly winds. A good high headland and perhaps valley and or lagoon to the north can even turn the wind offshore at the point. We all know the spots to go to when the wind will pick up from a dreaded angle. This even applies to north-east winds as well as southerlies. There are many great places where the common summertime combination of easterly trade swell and north-east sea breeze is still a great workable combination.
Some points are so well aligned that they can even turn the dreaded south-easterly into an offshore running down the point. It is tremendous serendipity that the coastal features most likely to be aligned for a good peel angle are the same features likely to turn the prevailing wind to a near offshore angle.
The point of all this: straight coasts are bad. However, if you can find points facing up to 90 degrees away from the straight coast there's a good chance of a favourable peel angle on any obliquely angled swell. It's not the only factor, what happens down below the waterline in the bedrock also has great influence on wave shape. In the next article we will look at the sort of geology that creates optimal reef shapes.
Coastal Creationsim is an eight part series written by Chris Buykx. Chris Buykx is a geologist, traveller and lifelong surfer. Specialising in eco-tourism, his passion is interpreting nature and the environment. Chris is a resident of Sydney’s Northern Beaches though he's currently doing a lap of Australia with his family. Read past articles:
Part 1: Basic Reef Shapes
Part 2: Complex curves
Comments
You seem to be focussed mainly on reefs Chris but the predominant factor in nearshore bathymetry and hence wave quality on most of those east coast Points is not underlying geology but sand flow and replenishment.
EG Broken Head is a much different rock structure compared to the cenozoic lava flow that formed Lennox Head and the basalt boulder bottom, yet they both operate as high quality sand bottom point breaks.
Not meant as a criticism, just an opening to a different emphasis which I believe is more important. Anyone who surfs around here knows that sand replenishment is the most important factor for quality surf.
Yes, sand matters a lot - which is why I have saved it till last. Coastal creations #8 will look at Sand points. Having spent 35,000 kilometres and much of this year exploring and surfing the Australian Coast, it has actually brought in to perspective that sandy East Coast is unusual compared to the rest of the continent. The great bulk of the Australian coast suffers from little mobile sand in onshore and offshore sand bodies. The difference is for most southern and western costs the sand has high proportion of carbonate from shell and other biogenic sources. The carbonate rich sands have become cemented into limestones at times of low sea level. The end result is lots of limestone (both onshore and offshore, wait for #5 and how this can be both good and bad for surf)
The East Coast is different as the content enjoys bigger hills and gradients as well as higher rainfall. The result is terrestrial sands (manly quartz) overwhelm the biogenic carbonate sands. Without much carbonate, these sands are not cemented when exposed during low sea levels. The end result is that almost all sand delivered to the East Coast remans as sand, either in beaches, dunes, islands and offshore sand bodies.
"The point of all this: straight coasts are bad." But then the Port Stephens coast is anything but straight, it's massively indented, yet it doesn't have the reefs and points you'd think it might.
True, Port Stephens is underwhelming despite its exceptional exposure to swell and diversity of shapes. It is far from straight coast. As usual - I blame geology for poor reef potential. The igneous crystalline rocks (mainly andesite) are jointed and break up in to blocky chunks, rather than forming good surfing reefs. While there are a few novelty slabs for the amusement of the boogers, the igneous rocks of Port Stephens won't form great reefs. I surf Port Stephens a lot (visiting family) and have scored a few spots big time. However more often than not, there is nowhere making the most of the swell - and I will head home and get good waves on reefs of Sydney. The andesite that makes the peaks like Tomaree just breaks up in to large blocks.
Check out coming article #6 for more on what contributes to a good igneous rock reef.
chris what are your thoughts on an artificial sand body off one mile for instance? Through winter it is offshore 90% of the time but as the shoreline alignment is such that it creates wall to wall close outs. For years I have had a concept in my head that would enable all the wasted potential to come to life. Would it be possible to focus wave energy at one mile without effecting samurai to the north? So much potential there.
Ahhh! So the real point of all this is that we should be building artificial reefs that take all those above factors into account whilst minimising the ecological impact. Yeah. I get it.
I have noticed that on the Emerald Coast all the rock ledges have been tipped to an awkward "up and diagonal" angle in some ancient geological time.
Any geologists (I think that is the person for the job) out there care to enlighten us as to how?
Its a great place for a reef break surgeon to fill in the gaps to create beautiful reefs out of almost reefs....
Thanks Billie, you have highlighted an important geological factor affecting much of the NSW coast, that is poorly aligned geology. Much of the NSW South Coast (from Batemans Bay to the Vic border suffers from steep to vertical dipping rocks. Even worse, they are aligned close to parallel to the coast. With differing hardness between the beds, they erode to the jagged cards that are not conducive good surf reefs. The rare exception is where these outcrops can provide a point to anchor a good sandbank (e.g. Snapper Rocks)
Similarly the mid North Coast from Seal Rocks to Grafton also suffers from similarly poorly aligned geology. Have a look around Coffs Harbour and you quickly realise that the geology is not conducive to smoothly convex surfing reefs. I won't bore you with the actual geology, but the simple rule is Steeply dipping to vertically folded sedimentary rocks generally make poor reef shapes.
In next weeks article I look at why there are so many good reefs between Ulladulla and the Central Coast
Yo billie, rocks can tip and be folded by tectonic forces that are transmitted from plate margins to areas of weakness. When they reach an area of weakness, it can buckle and the rocks tip. The edge of the australian plate that corresponds to your coastline is sorta bumping against the plate of new zealand/tonga area. If E-W compression is the cause, folded structures can formed.. maybe see if you can find it dipping the other way on the drive home. If E-W extension is the cause, the plate breaks apart as blocks that tilt down towards the west.
In Victoria there are long stretches of straight beach coast that face directly to the SW swells that is the main swell direction in Vicco(think Phillip Island/Mornington Peninsula/Johanna). Also, the swells that hit Victoria are generally groundswell with a higher period than the east coast gets on a regular basis.
These spots produce very consistent beachbreaks with high quality sandbanks, often held in place by underlying rock formations.
Just curious for some thoughts on how those factors also produce high quality waves despite there not being the so called favorable alignment with the swell angle? how much does the period of the swell play a factor here?
IMO in regard to beach breaks swells that hit straight on actually help form good banks in many cases as it causes rips to pull straight back out rather than alongshore gutters, for instance the gold coast beachies between Nobbies to the Spit generally get good banks after a run of straight east swells while when you have a run of South or South East or North east swell you get straight banks with longshore gutters, this effect is worst with long beaches.
Same thing happens in Vic to much West swells can cause straight banks and to much swell can cause mushroom banks currently whats happened from winter.
IMO the best conditions for bank forming for Vic beachies is a run of smaller swells with offshores,I swear off shores help for some reason? although sometimes SE winds can help create good banks but there is so many different factors like tide heights possibly even heavy rain and yes swell period longer period swells as long as not to big IMO help groom banks..well at least at my local.
I think the long period swell thing is also a factor in forming good coral reefs, well it seems that way in Indo but it makes sense long period swells are more even and focussed and coral reefs are live things that to a degree are sculpted by swells.
I know plenty of right hand points on the east coast that love a north east swell and its peel angle...
You have focused your series on geology and reefs. A good recent article on Swellnet focuses on Marram grass and it's effects on beach sand movements and bank creation. Rock, reefs and sand are important and a holistic view is needed. Lets get the specialists together for a well rounded understanding.
I should be happy to see a picture of Tama next to the sub-heading "Why do some sections of coast just never really fire?" That should keep the crowds down.
But its also kind of depressing!
Glad to see everyone is engaged and thinking about their local surf situation. Don't worry, almost all of your questions will be answered in coming weeks. Keep in mind this is an 8 part series and I will progressively work through the various processes and set-ups.
In Coastal Creationism #1, we looked at basic reef shapes. In #2 there was mor detailed analysis of these curves. Having outlined the basics, in this weeks article (#3) we look at the coasts themselves - and what this generally mean for surf set-ups.
Next week we go below the surface and Coastal Creationism 4 looks at the difference between a wave rich geology and a wave poor geology.
In later weeks Story 5 looks at swells being blocked and why some parts of SW Aus are epic and other a bit lame. Story six looks at Slabs, 7 at Coral reefs and #8 analyses Sand points. Beach breaks and sandbanks are a whole other can of worms, thankfully Craig's marram grass story has already made a great contribution to the discussion.
The series has an Australia-wide and global reach, although it will reflect my Sydney origins and my travelling experiences.
I will try and respond to specific local questions in those place where the series does cover it well. Otherwise be patient - there is lots more to come.
Good to see surfers getting interested in their surroundings. Around SA, a few spots come to mind.
From robe to goolwa, the sea level was once much higher. The mature sands with uniform grain sizes that have been sorted by time do not respond well to currents and swells that would otherwise form good banks. The slope gradient is also very shallow causing fat waves and long paddle outs. Towards tunkalilla, the slope of the Adelaide hills provide a steep slope and hollow waves, and dynamic sediment accumulation from the eroded cliffs of variable lithologies (bronze sand) allows banks to shape up nicely (although sand gets in your eyes when you duck dive). Over time the brown minerals will be broken and stripped from the sand by waves, and float down to form fine clays past the drop off. Leaving only strong quartz grains behind (white sands).
At seaford and pondie, limestone boulders that are trapped in the high energy surf zone form these nice lenticular reefs that are probably the convex type you mention. It is interesting to note that the gulf of st vincent formed due to the weight of the adelaide hills causing the crust to flex, forming a depression, in geology called a foreland basin)
At cactus, the limestone reefs are still intact. On the yorke peninsula at salmon hole and daly heads, stronger more quartz rich rocks form bouldery reefs that will be there for a long time, and they are already some of the oldest rocks around here.
Fantastic series, thanx for sharing Chris.
If we limit the conversation to just surfing reefbreaks (no sand input) then from my simple observations, hard rock is bad, and softer rock, is good.
This hypothesis is based on the NSW coastline, 1590km in length, 205+ recognised surfing reefs. Geological surveys have identified at least four distinct geological provinces; the Lachlan Orogen (far south coast to just north of Batemans Bay), the Sydney Basin, and north of Newcastle is the New England Orogen and the Clarence-Morton Basin.
The other limiting factor is sand, re-interpreted as, there is actually more rocky coastline on the far south coast, compared to the north coast of NSW, where the rocky coastline is drowned in sand.
Yet - and this is critical - I noted close to 80% of the NSW surfing reefs are located in the Sydney Basin, a geological province extending over only 34% of the coastline, yet dominated by sedimentary siltstones and sandstones.
In contrast, the far south, only has a few reef breaks, the best one is a cliff side boulder field. Only 6% of the 205 surfing reefs are located in the southern geological province, the Lachlan Orogen, which extends over 17% of the NSW coastline. This province is dominated by harder geology like basalt and granite. This is also NSW’s most rocky coastline, 50% of the coastline is rocky.
This spatial distribution begs the question, is there a link between softer sedimentary rock and the likelihood of surfing reefs? Conversely, are surfing reefs less likely to occur in regions of harder geology?
What is it about soft sedimentary rock?
The horizontal bedding planes?
Add a bit of faulting, and they can tip into the oncoming swells, so just right.
Probably because harder rock with high elevation makes for cliffs with deep water and no wave action. Think about tough rocky headlands that stick out and have no breaking waves, yet in between them where softer rock is has weathered to sandy beaches, and waves can break there in shallow water.
Thanks Andrew - Just wait till Coastal Creationism #4 next week. Big focus on (near) horizontally bedded sedimentary rocks and how it translates in to some of the most wave rich coast in the continent.
However its not till #6 that I address the relationship between harder igneous rocks and certain types of reef.
At this stage I have not scheduled an article about cliff side boulder fields but there are so many good questions that I will have a chat to Stu and Ben about some more stories
Well I alternate between a sand bottom Brisbane metamorphic tilted sedimentary rock point, and basalt boulder field Point.
What about those limestone reefs of SA?
Thanks browndog for your input