The United States(!) of A
Supafreak wrote:indo-dreaming wrote:Speaking of Rudd
From yesterday
"How Kevin Rudd spent $24,000 in a single day as Anthony Albanese's ambassador to the US - and it's Aussie taxpayers who will foot the bill"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14248943/kevin-rudd-tax-bil-uni...
Come on indo , daily mail , realy ? They score even lower than jeffy’s crap . https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
Wow your “ media bias fact check “
What a great idea
It means you never have to view anything ever again,
Just keep posting that link
And take Foxes word for everything!
But who checks your beloved “
“Media bias fact check “
Or doesn’t that. really matter ?
So then anyone who points out a right wing lie
Is obviously communist, and very rude!
Nature is healing.
Since Canada will soon become a US state, I'll put this in here.
https://www.thefp.com/p/bari-weiss-canada-the-comprehensive-failure-of-j...
Bari Weiss: The Comprehensive Failure of Justin Trudeau
The Canadian prime minister was celebrated as a liberal hero. But many of his policies were illiberal—and unpopular.
In the nine years since he became Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau has been hailed not only as the savior of the country’s Liberal Party but more broadly as the glamorous beacon of Western liberalism. Or so it was until yesterday, when, in front of his official residence in Ottawa, Canada’s prime minister announced he was stepping down.
The question is what happened—and who’s to blame.
To hear Trudeau tell it, the problem is squabbling within the ranks of his own Liberal-led minority government: “If I’m having to fight internal battles,” he said yesterday, “I cannot be the best option in that election.” And to be sure, the precipitating event for this crisis was last month’s surprise resignation of Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau’s top deputy and finance minister.
But the problem with Trudeau’s government is not the name at the top of the ticket. The problem is bad ideas, strongly held.
Trudeau may think of himself as a liberal, and that might even be the name of his party, but his government actually epitomizes illiberal progressivism. Wedded to policies rooted in bien-pensant concerns while neglecting the Canadian public’s everyday challenges, Trudeau has presided over Canada’s deterioration into the sick man of North America. Long a haven for those hoping to escape dictatorships and civil wars for a stable democracy, the situation has become so bad that some Canadians, including Gad Saad, have left for the U.S.
Consider the following:
Economy: Trudeau is deeply unpopular—according to an Ipsos poll from last month, 73 percent of Canadians, including 43 percent of Liberal voters, believed Trudeau should step down as party leader. Perhaps no issue drives that more than the economy. In her resignation letter, Freeland called out Trudeau’s “costly political gimmicks,” a reference to his $4.5 billion plan to send $175 checks to everyone in the country making less than $105,000 a year. Canada’s government, once a model of fiscal prudence, now runs massive deficits to fund increasingly ineffective social programs.
Trudeau’s runaway taxing and spending has made Canadians poorer, in part due to his signature carbon tax, which has reduced real incomes across the country. Before the pandemic, Canada’s per capita GDP was about 80 percent of America’s. This year, it will be just 70 percent, according to IMF projections. Donald Trump jokes that Canada should become a state, but if it somehow became one, it would be among the poorest in the union.
As The Free Press’s Rupa Subramanya has reported, this has left behind an entire generation of young voters who are fleeing the Liberals and heading for Pierre Poilievre’s increasingly feisty and populist Conservatives. Polls indicate the Conservatives would win a commanding majority in parliament if an election was held today.
Immigration: Canada has long welcomed immigrants. Yet for the first time in 25 years, a majority of Canadians now say immigration levels are too high. “The 1.1 million new immigrants who came to the country in 2022 alone drove unprecedented competition for jobs,” the head of Canada’s leading youth employment agency told Subramanya. “We are seeing some of the highest youth unemployment since 2012 in a matter of a year and a half.”
Among these immigrants are some individuals who do not share Canada’s values of tolerance and pluralism. This, in turn, has helped feed an explosion of antisemitism in the country. (More on that below.)
Crime: Violent crime has skyrocketed under Trudeau’s leadership. Homicides rose by more than 50 percent between 2014 and 2022, and on a per capita basis, there is now more violent crime there than in the U.S. This, again, is a direct result of Trudeau’s policies, which have increasingly gone easy on criminals, even explicitly giving lighter sentences to people of color who’ve been convicted of crimes. It’s an astounding turnaround for a country that long kept serious violence confined to hockey rinks and subarctic bars.
Truckers: In 2022, protesters—many of them truckers irked by vaccine requirements mandated for traveling between Canada and the U.S.—traveled to Ottawa to voice their opposition to policies that were making their country less prosperous and less free. It wasn’t that the truckers, admittedly engaged in the aggressive tactic of blockading the capital’s streets, were wholeheartedly anti-vax (as Subramanya reported at the time, “the vast majority” were vaccinated). It was that, under Trudeau, they were distressed at what was happening to the country they loved.
Trudeau dismissed the protesters as “a few thousand people shouting and waving swastikas.” He invoked emergency powers never deployed in Canadian history to rob protesters of their access to banks, freezing accounts and suspending credit cards. It was an unnecessary and deeply illiberal response to a peaceful protest by fed-up citizens, many of them immigrants themselves. (In 2024, a Canadian judge ruled that Trudeau’s actions were unconstitutional.)
“We came to Canada to be free—not slaves,” one Ukrainian immigrant who joined the protests told The Free Press at the time. “We lived under communism, and, in Canada, we’re now fighting for our freedom.”
Censorship: Under the guise of combating “disinformation” (a term, as always, vaguely defined), Trudeau’s government has cracked down on what news Canadians are allowed to consume. Canada’s Online News Act was sold as a way to make social media companies pay news organizations when linking to their content, but in reality it was a sop to legacy media—and wound up preventing our own reporter in Ottawa from sharing her work for this publication on social media.
Rise of Assisted Suicide: Under Trudeau, medically assisted suicide has become alarmingly popular. In some provinces in 2023 nearly 5 percent of Canadians died this way. The explosion of the procedure’s popularity is due in large part to how lax Canadians have become in selecting who can die this way—all a Canadian needs to show is that they suffer from an ailment “intolerable to them” and that can’t “be relieved under conditions that they consider acceptable.” (Thankfully, parliament decided last year to postpone extending the treatment to those whose sole cause of suffering was a mental illness.)
Drug Use: The fentanyl epidemic in Canada has been greatly exacerbated by Liberal Party policies. In British Columbia, one of the most progressive provinces in the country, small amounts of hard drugs are legal. As Subramanya has reported in our pages, drug overdose was the leading cause of death among 10- to 18-year-olds in the province last year. Yet Trudeau has continued to push for “harm reduction” strategies—such as “safe sites” for injections—that have quite obviously failed. British Columbia now realizes how profoundly misguided this experiment has been and is embracing “involuntary care facilities” for drug addicts and the mentally ill.
Antisemitism: Since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Canada has become hostile to Jews in ways that would boggle the mind of even the average anti-Israel American protester. Last month, Terry Glavin reported in The Free Press that “despair has become a feature of everyday life for Jews across Canada who are experiencing open hatred—and yet are living under a government that appears either blind to it, paralyzed by it, or indifferent to it.”
Trudeau’s commitment to combating hate speech and swastika-wavers apparently has firm limits: When presented with genuine calls for genocide at top Canadian universities, his government has done next to nothing. There has been a 670 percent increase in antisemitic incidents in the country over the past year. Canada’s Jewish community, which constitutes less than 1 percent of the population, have been the targets of 70 percent of religious motivated hate crimes.
And then there’s Trudeau’s poor judgment: Upon Fidel Castro’s death in 2016, to choose just one example, Trudeau offered lavish official condolences for the Cuban dictator with no mention of the gross human rights violations that marked his reign. Instead, Trudeau referred to Castro’s “love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for ‘el Comandante.’ ”
What’s happening in Canadian politics is not happening in a vacuum. It is a symptom of a much broader phenomenon. Call it the great crack-up of the old consensus.
The old consensus held that immigration was an absolute good, with multiculturalism the end goal. Arguments contrary to progressive social attitudes was “disinformation” that must be combated by robust online censorship. People would quickly adjust to massive changes in social attitudes around sex and gender because objections would be seen as bigoted. And anyone who said anything that questioned the consensus would become a pariah.
This consensus is being rejected across the West. Donald Trump won the presidency by building a multiracial, working-class coalition that had little affection for the progressive activists who supposedly spoke for them. In Italy, Giorgia Meloni—who launched her political career on the far-right—now leads perhaps the most stable country in Western Europe. In Britain, Labour’s Keir Starmer was able to wrest control of Downing Street after 14 years of Conservative rule, largely because Conservatives had not delivered on immigration restrictions. Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration Reform UK party is now ascendant there, in large part because of his muscular stance against Islamism and immigration.
Austria just elected its most right-wing government since the end of World War II. And Germany, once the heart of the old consensus under Chancellor Angela Merkel, is still dealing with the fallout with her 2015 decision to accept roughly a million asylum-seekers from the Middle East. The hard-right AfD is now poised to become the second largest party in Germany’s parliament in next month’s election.
There are certain things that simply can’t be wished away. Things like Islamic fundamentalism, the societal downsides of mass immigration, rising crime, and stagnant economics. Trudeau—who, in a fit of desperation late last year, tried to reverse his immigration policies—learned these lessons too late. He is the latest casualty of the great crack-up. But he will not be the last.
Canadian Mary Frances ,
Just appeared at Woodford folk festival
along with 4or 5 other Canadian bands,
Canadians everywhere
They looked pretty happy though.
Exxotixjeff][quote=Supafreak wrote:indo-dreaming wrote:Speaking of Rudd
From yesterday
"How Kevin Rudd spent $24,000 in a single day as Anthony Albanese's ambassador to the US - and it's Aussie taxpayers who will foot the bill"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14248943/kevin-rudd-tax-bil-uni...
Come on indo , daily mail , realy ? They score even lower than jeffy’s crap . https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/
Wow your “ media bias fact check “
What a great idea
It means you never have to view anything ever again,
Just keep posting that link
And take Foxes word for everything!
But who checks your beloved “
“Media bias fact check “
Or doesn’t that. really matter ?
So then anyone who points out a right wing lie
Is obviously communist, and very rude
Got they yellow writing and arrows etc
Another new channel.
Had a dig this one is part of young turks network.
Jeffy is on fire today , wound up tighter than a antique clock . Just breathe jeffy .
BTW. yeah i should have known better on that dailymail link.
It sucks sometimes, it was an article i saw on social media barely read it, posted it quickly as seemed relevant and then everyone paid it attention.
While other times you may post something that you have really looked into and value and hope people will read or discuss, but nobody does.
Argh i guess thats life.
Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Supafreak wrote:Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Well who owns Laura Looma then ?
Or didn’t she say what she said because you didn’t view it. ?
Anyway, we should be celebrating
Insurrection day !
Yay for the heroic cop bashers
But I think they’re trying to delete that date from history somehow ,
Maybe using media bias fact checking site.
Anyone mentioning insurrection day has to be Far far left.
That’s pathetic
Imagine relying on a tin pot site , to explain away every little criticism,
You really are diminishing in the reality process.
Just breathe jeffy
Supafreak wrote:Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Mediabiasfactcheck
Overall we rate Fox News right biased.
Based on electoral positions that align with the right,
and questionable , due to the promotion of
propaganda , conspiracy theories and
pseudo science, the use of poor sources and
numerous false claims and failed fact checks .
Supafreak wrote:Just breathe jeffy
So your main points have been reduced to
Just breathe Jeff y
and mediabiasedfact checking ,
I think you’re running out of ideas?
So hypothetically, if you did have a news source that wasn’t biased,
what would it be?????
Sitting on the dock of a bay ,
watching the tide roll away,
Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Just breathe jeffy
So your main points have been reduced to
Just breathe Jeff y
and mediabiasedfact checking ,
I think you’re running out of ideas?
So hypothetically, if you did have a news source that wasn’t biased,
what would it be?????
There’s plenty that are very central, that don’t use loaded words and are highly accurate. Unfortunately jeffy none of them are in your algorithm. Keep going though I’m sure juliang & heeby enjoy your posts .
Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Mediabiasfactcheck
Overall we rate Fox News right biased.
Based on electoral positions that align with the right,
and questionable , due to the promotion of
propaganda , conspiracy theories and
pseudo science, the use of poor sources and
numerous false claims and failed fact checks .
Jeffy , who has posted Fox News on this thread ? There’s as many extreme right media outlets as there are extreme left, it’s just propaganda. Maybe seek out some media sources that aren’t so extreme., beware though, they might not tell you what you want/need to hear/read . Remember to breathe .
Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Mediabiasfactcheck
Overall we rate Fox News right biased.
Based on electoral positions that align with the right,
and questionable , due to the promotion of
propaganda , conspiracy theories and
pseudo science, the use of poor sources and
numerous false claims and failed fact checks .Jeffy , who has posted Fox News on this thread ? There’s as many extreme right media outlets as there are extreme left, it’s just propaganda. Maybe seek out some media sources that aren’t so extreme., beware though, they might not tell you what you want/need to hear/read . Remember to breathe .
Well your the media bias expert
So give me your opinion on an unbiased news source,
Otherwise you’ll keep quoting some unchecked, bias site .
You never dispute the content of a video,
You just quote some dubious 3rd party
who haven’t viewed the latest 1 hour old video,
That’s why you’re a bogus waste of time.
Oh I’m no expert jeffy , just don’t take what dodgy news sources spit out as gospel , maybe you could start looking at AP news , Reuters, for starters . There are plenty more if you care to look . I’m also well aware of the TNI & what happened during covid .
Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Young Turks eh ? they don’t rate very well, surprise surprise . They don’t even disclose who owns them , could be Putin ! or or or China ! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-young-turks/
Mediabiasfactcheck
Overall we rate Fox News right biased.
Based on electoral positions that align with the right,
and questionable , due to the promotion of
propaganda , conspiracy theories and
pseudo science, the use of poor sources and
numerous false claims and failed fact checks .Jeffy , who has posted Fox News on this thread ? There’s as many extreme right media outlets as there are extreme left, it’s just propaganda. Maybe seek out some media sources that aren’t so extreme., beware though, they might not tell you what you want/need to hear/read . Remember to breathe .
Well your the media bias expert
So give me your opinion on an unbiased news source,
Otherwise you’ll keep quoting some unchecked, bias site .
You never dispute the content of a video,
You just quote some dubious 3rd party
who haven’t viewed the latest 1 hour old video,
That’s why you’re a bogus waste of time.
Seriously Jeffy , why would anyone waste 1 hour watching crap from a dodgy YouTube video channel ? The orange one has got you worked up into a real tizz .
Ah you’re back to your desperate
Trump Derangement Syndrome
which fell in a heap , when Musk started getting critised
Very one dimensional.
Sorry jeffy it’s not a video, maybe you can get someone to read it to you . https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/yellow-journalism-examples. Yellow Journalism Today
Yellow journalism today isn't all that different from yellow journalism in the past, though it does seem to be even more prevalent now. While journalism is supposed to focus on factual information presented objectively, yellow journalism is anything but that. The war for clicks and views seems to have created an epidemic of sensationalized headlines that are anything but objective and often not even true (i.e., fake news).
Whenever you see sensationalized headlines that scandalize or exaggerate what the content is about, you're seeing an example of yellow journalism.
Jeffy boy , if you can’t find anyone to read the article to you , go to YouTube and put a search in on ‘ yellow journalism ‘ TBB put up a post explaining the yellow journalism & red journalism but you probably didn’t see it as it wasn’t a video .
Reuters may be unbiased
but it is based in the U K and covers the whole world, Meidas Touch is based in the US and only covers US politics,
with US lawyers and legal experts,
So it could be perceived as left-leaning
But has a whole lot more information on US politics than Reuters , and more up to date.
Maybe that’s your problem with your lack of information.
Supafreak wrote:Jeffy boy , if you can’t find anyone to read the article to you , go to YouTube and put a search in on ‘ yellow journalism ‘ TBB put up a post explaining the yellow journalism & red journalism but you probably didn’t see it as it wasn’t a video .
Ah you expect me to read your post
straight away when I’m reading something else and watching the news,
Go f yourself
Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Jeffy boy , if you can’t find anyone to read the article to you , go to YouTube and put a search in on ‘ yellow journalism ‘ TBB put up a post explaining the yellow journalism & red journalism but you probably didn’t see it as it wasn’t a video .
Ah you expect me to read your post
straight away when I’m reading something else and watching the news,
Go f yourself
Just breathe jeffy
Yeah I am breathing
But your ignorance is breathtaking
Yellow journalism is usually unresearched “
Well why does Meidas touch have US lawyers and experts,
You read an article, usually nothing to do with US politics, and you apply it to all the videos you never watch, because you might not like them,
Talk about generalised ignorance
Giving examples of the Spanish American war
That shows exactly how irrelevant and out of date you are.
If you think that Twitter X and Musk were around during the Spanish American War
you need your head examined mate.
What news sources could we suggest for old Jeff that are either as neutral as possible or slightly left leaning and regarded as reliable?
What about "the associated press"?
USA based, slightly left leaning, but rated high.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/
They have a youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC52X5wxOL_s5yw0dQk7NtgA
or
NPR
All the same ratings, slight left, high, USA
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/npr/
indo-dreaming wrote:What news sources could we suggest for old Jeff that are either as neutral as possible or slightly left leaning and regarded as reliable?
Haven’t got time to read your links now
I know that Meidas Touch has a lot more relevant news than Reuters
And there’s a lot of other left leaning outlets with shit more relevant news than Reuters
Biased doesn’t mean false ?
What about "the associated press"?USA based, slightly left leaning, but rated high.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/They have a youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC52X5wxOL_s5yw0dQk7NtgAor
NPR
All the same ratings, slight left, high, USA
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/npr/
Even Rolling Stone who are clearly left leaning find meidas touch a shade dodgy. Hahah too funny………..,,.,,,,,,POLITICS
THE TROUBLE WITH MEIDASTOUCH
The brothers behind the breakout anti-Trump PAC are the golden boys of the #Resistance, but when ‘Rolling Stone’ took a look beneath the surface, their response turned Trumpian https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/meidastouch-2020...
The problem is mediabiased fact-check don’t report on the news
They only give their opinion of news outlets
So Meidas Touch gets mixed for factual reporting, due to lack of transparency with funding.
Fox News gets
“The promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories and pseudoscience
and the use of poor sources and numerous false claims and failed fact checks “
And it is important because that is the main news source for Trump and MAGA
Can you notice the difference there???)
Exxotixjeff wrote:Yeah I am breathing
But your ignorance is breathtaking
Yellow journalism is usually unresearched “
Well why does Meidas touch have US lawyers and experts,
You read an article, usually nothing to do with US politics, and you apply it to all the videos you never watch, because you might not like them,
Talk about generalised ignorance
Giving examples of the Spanish American war
That shows exactly how irrelevant and out of date you are.
If you think that Twitter X and Musk were around during the Spanish American War
you need your head examined mate.
Hahaha you clown, it’s not my article , whoever read it to you did a poor job of explaining it to you . Breathe deeper jeffy
Supafreak wrote:Even Rolling Stone who are clearly left leaning find meidas touch a shade dodgy. Hahah too funny………..,,.,,,,,,POLITICS
THE TROUBLE WITH MEIDASTOUCH
The brothers behind the breakout anti-Trump PAC are the golden boys of the #Resistance, but when ‘Rolling Stone’ took a look beneath the surface, their response turned Trumpian https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/meidastouch-2020...
That's actually an interesting read.
∆ Fvck the cognitive dissonance of this unit is next level. Zero cred & continue's to bleat. NOTHING you post has any traction. Keep spinning ur wheels EckyJeff. I'm pretty sure wise head's will prevail & ur group think methodology views will be considered for what they are ... Kiff.
You're so full of it ur eye's must be brown.
On youtube, I've found NewsNation to be pretty fair. Maybe slightly left leaning but nothing really noticable.
Even ex CNN guy Chris Coumo seems to be doing some proper journalism for a change.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsnation/
Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Yeah I am breathing
But your ignorance is breathtaking
Yellow journalism is usually unresearched “
Well why does Meidas touch have US lawyers and experts,
You read an article, usually nothing to do with US politics, and you apply it to all the videos you never watch, because you might not like them,
Talk about generalised ignorance
Giving examples of the Spanish American war
That shows exactly how irrelevant and out of date you are.
If you think that Twitter X and Musk were around during the Spanish American War
you need your head examined mate.Hahaha you clown, it’s not my article , whoever read it to you did a poor job of explaining it to you . Breathe deeper jeffy
So why did you post and insist i read it then
If it irrelevant out of date crap
Or didn’t you read that either
You don’t read anything but you know everything
Haha
Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Yeah I am breathing
But your ignorance is breathtaking
Yellow journalism is usually unresearched “
Well why does Meidas touch have US lawyers and experts,
You read an article, usually nothing to do with US politics, and you apply it to all the videos you never watch, because you might not like them,
Talk about generalised ignorance
Giving examples of the Spanish American war
That shows exactly how irrelevant and out of date you are.
If you think that Twitter X and Musk were around during the Spanish American War
you need your head examined mate.Hahaha you clown, it’s not my article , whoever read it to you did a poor job of explaining it to you . Breathe deeper jeffy
So why did you post and insist i read it then
If it irrelevant out of date crap
Or didn’t you read that either
Ha ha
Yes my mistake for thinking that you may understand what the article is about, it clearly went over your head which is understandable. All you picked out was examples of the past and ignored what the article is saying You have the hide to call others ignorant , funny stuff .
tubeshooter wrote:On youtube, I've found NewsNation to be pretty fair. Maybe slightly left leaning but nothing really noticable.
Even ex CNN guy Chris Coumo seems to be doing some proper journalism for a change.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsnation/
Agreed TS , there are plenty of good sources that are slightly left or right, it’s the extreme leaning sources with all the sensationalism headlines, clicks = $ I don’t get what jeffy’s trying to achieve . If it’s to look like a nut job he’s doing a outstanding job .
Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Supafreak wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Yeah I am breathing
But your ignorance is breathtaking
Yellow journalism is usually unresearched “
Well why does Meidas touch have US lawyers and experts,
You read an article, usually nothing to do with US politics, and you apply it to all the videos you never watch, because you might not like them,
Talk about generalised ignorance
Giving examples of the Spanish American war
That shows exactly how irrelevant and out of date you are.
If you think that Twitter X and Musk were around during the Spanish American War
you need your head examined mate.Hahaha you clown, it’s not my article , whoever read it to you did a poor job of explaining it to you . Breathe deeper jeffy
So why did you post and insist i read it then
If it irrelevant out of date crap
Or didn’t you read that either
Ha haYes my mistake for thinking that you may understand what the article is about, it clearly went over your head which is understandable. All you picked out was examples of the past and ignored what the article is saying You have the hide to call others ignorant , funny stuff .
Actually I stopped at the bit that said yellow news is usually unreaserched
Because I knew that Meidas touch is staffed by current and past lawyers and legal experts in the US legal system ,
Who know shit more about things than you do
And they usually report news way ahead of main stream
But your only guessing
And your unbiased
Media bias fact checking
Thinks that Fox is way worse than Meidastouch. when it comes to fact checking and fake news,
So when someone says they’re as bad as each other,
Your favourite site disproves that.
Thanks.
Report news way ahead of mainstream , like Elon’s going bankrupt and Trump’s going to invade Canada , Mexico & Greenland ? Looking forward to your next educational instalment jeffy .
Supafreak wrote:Report news way ahead of mainstream , like Elon’s going bankrupt and Trump’s going to invade Canada , Mexico & Greenland ? Looking forward to your next educational instalment jeffy .
Your lack of information is embarrassing
Trump can’t rule out using military action to acquire Greenland and reacquire
the Panama Canal ,
Fox & CNN , breathe jeffy ….. breathe .
Exxotixjeff wrote:Trump can’t rule out using military action to acquire Greenland and reacquire
the Panama Canal ,
JEFFY,only 12 more sleeps!
What Trump says & what he actually does is very different. Some press have learnt to take him seriously but not literally. I don’t think jeffy will be getting any sleep, too busy building his bunker . Don’t forget ventilation down there jeffy .
Supafreak wrote:What Trump says & what he actually does is very different. Some press have learnt to take him seriously but not literally. I don’t think jeffy will be getting any sleep, too busy building his bunker . Don’t forget ventilation down there jeffy .
Haha so you don’t have to take what Trump says seriously,
But I’m sure the country’s he won’t rule out using military force on , sure as hell do.
That’s the bit you don’t seem to get ,
Destabilisation , but don’t think too hard about it.
I think it’s hilarious that the news sources you have previously bagged like fox & 9 , have now become your news source. Too farking funny .
Jeffy , have you thought about joining a facebook group ? I’m sure you would find some like minded folks that value your expertise in all things Trump . Your audience could be huge .
Supafreak wrote:I think it’s hilarious that the news sources you have previously bagged like fox & 9 , have now become your news source. Too farking funny .
I think it’s hilarious that you criticise every news source that I use,
So now I’m using different news sources that you can’t criticise,
and you still deflect and not address the issues
and carry on whining and little insults,
that’s hilarious.
Yes you’re right, dealing with ostrich cult ignorance, is impossible.
Jeffy , can you please explain what Australian’s and the rest of the world should be doing in preparation for what is going to happen after 20th January. What controls should we all be putting in place ? I don’t expect you will answer, that’s ok just thought you might have aspirations to be leader of some type of movement .
Supafreak wrote:Jeffy , can you please explain what Australian’s and the rest of the world should be doing in preparation for what is going to happen after 20th January. What controls should we all be putting in place ? I don’t expect you will answer, that’s ok just thought you might have aspirations to be leader of some type of movement .
No I can’t really explain,what everyone should be doing in preparation for 20/1
Because it’s uncertain what will happen , Unknown?
And it affects everyone differently, ie whether Trump’s threatening military action or tariffs on different countries, or not.
And it’s not just Trump
Musk is trying to promote the far right parties in England and Germany etc
Pushing for world wide authoritarianism
And now Zuckerberg has taken away independent fact checkers on his sites ?
Septic Tanks are going to Septic Tank