The United States(!) of A
zenagain wrote:I'm getting a new car in December- was gonna get a new Outback as Japan will stop making them and I like Subaru's. The Japan one's are 1.8lt T but because they won't come to the negotiating table in good faith I'm changing brands and going diesel. Meeting with our bloke tomorrow- 2.0T 48v mild-hybrid. 1200km + to a tank. No brainer.
Next car will probs be an EV.
N box all the way..with a Spoon makeover!
Base, what a pleasure looking at those flickr pics- so many classic cars.
Our first family car that I can remember was an early 60's Chrysler Valiant similar to the one pictured. A roaming cow in FNQ put an end to that one sadly but my parents enjoyed telling the story years after.
wax24 wrote:That pic was True Sweetness, for sures. Shoot Basey, a thermos, a folding chair, and a card table (out the back of a wagon with no engine is a KINGDOM for some (many?)
If I ever Chuck It All…. That setup’ll do (as long as the wagon runs, lol)
yeh, sounds the fun, huh? my belmont's a '71, and im doing up a 1970s 10' caravan to drag about behind it. brrrrrrrrrmmmm... I plant trees, help animals, and have convinced many people around here to get limestone slabs, rather that concrete slabs, feel like my green cred's ok.. life's for now, I'll save getting an ev if I get another go-round, I reckon.
(cow @zen.. ouch!! the black ones from poorly-maintained-fence places down here at night are terrifying when you come across them)
Ah Roady, Japan's second most popular car but no thanks.
Not saying it's a bad car, just doesn't suit my needs. I need something wagon and something competent in the snow.
Media’s Touch Legal AF ,
Stands for Legal Analysis Freinds ,
Not someone’s opinion on whether someone is far left or far right or middle of the road.
Exxotixjeff wrote:Roadkill wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Lawyer Michael Popok
Explains to Eric Trump, why double jeopardy
,doesn’t apply to Donald’s case , because single jeopardy only applies when a jury is sworn in ,
And Jack Smith dismissed Trump’s case before a jury was sworn in,
So Trumps case can be reopened when he leaves office.
Trumps legal team should have opposed
Jack Smiths motion to dismiss before a jury was sworn in , but missed the opportunity?Popok is as far left as maga is far right. He became so boring and one sided in the run up to the election...is still crying like Hollywood lefties.
Popok / Shapiro...same but different but more same than different.
Yeah but he is a lawyer who understands the
US legal system, so it doesn’t matter if he’s left or right
Or too boring for you does it ?
but he is way too biased..so will only present in his favour.
indo-dreaming wrote:fitzroy-21 wrote:GS has such a raging boner for ID, trolls him so incessantly, he appears to lack self awareness and rational thought. Must be all that blood rushing to the wrong head.
"#there’salwaysanothercomment", RK was on the money with "irony", mindless comments all over the home page today from GS.
Regarding Tesla's, it not just the cost & servicing, they need special tyres that can't just be bought off the shelf anywhere also.
Im glad others notice, its just weird.
Hey #shitforbrains (plural) look above ^^ I think you will find @info replied to my general personal comment in a very undignified and derogatory manner this morning, now he could have chosen to ignore it but he couldn’t because as SN resident #forummonitor you know he can’t because #there’salwaysanothercomment! Geez, it really is like fishing for flathead here sometimes, all so very predictable but please do carry on
My daily driver . 
Supafreak wrote:My daily driver .
that's mean, @Supa!
Roadkill wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Roadkill wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Lawyer Michael Popok
Explains to Eric Trump, why double jeopardy
,doesn’t apply to Donald’s case , because single jeopardy only applies when a jury is sworn in ,
And Jack Smith dismissed Trump’s case before a jury was sworn in,
So Trumps case can be reopened when he leaves office.
Trumps legal team should have opposed
Jack Smiths motion to dismiss before a jury was sworn in , but missed the opportunity?Popok is as far left as maga is far right. He became so boring and one sided in the run up to the election...is still crying like Hollywood lefties.
Popok / Shapiro...same but different but more same than different.
Yeah but he is a lawyer who understands the
US legal system, so it doesn’t matter if he’s left or right
Or too boring for you does it ?but he is way too biased..so will only present in his favour.
Well if Trump can be retried after he leaves office , because he’s legal team should have opposed Jack Smith’s motion to dismiss
the case before a jury was called,
but didn’t,
Isn’t that worth mentioning,
and worth explaining to Eric Trump
Who is as clueless as everyone else there.?
The law is the law and should be separate to politics ,
sometimes the law becomes political for both sides, but sometimes it can’t be political,
what's an eric trump?
basesix wrote:what's an eric trump?
A clueless Fox guest ?
ahhh yup... another of the rolling cast of suckmuffins.
basesix wrote:ahhh yup... another of the rolling cast of suckmuffins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh4hqb0SWzk
You can’t say that can you?
no, I can't. I have a mouthful of sandwich.
can type it ok though.
Exxotixjeff does it again
?si=o9RFsJ73zi-0fOf8Better put your head phones on
sypkan wrote:and while we're on irony...
the ABC boss is carrying on about rogan, and misinformation and disinformation throughout covid
the ABC, whether consciously or not... were one of the biggest spreaders and indulgers of misinformation and the like
yes, they had a role to play, but even when things became so blindingly glaringly obvious to people capable of objective thought...
the ABC , toed the line, for another 12 - 24 months...
they still do now to a certain extent
I used to think these people knew they were spreading dubious information, but did it anyway, because it was for the greater good
I'm sure that was the case initially
but, no, their stubbornness and righteousness runs much deeper
they still believe half the bullshit!!
all of it?
it's about religion alright
it's a fucken cult!
in the truest sense of the term...
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/radio/huge-pileon-abc-boss-kim-...
Yes ABC were terrible during Covid i remember long after it was clear vaccines didn't prevent transmission they were still trying to push that line, it was weird.
if they even bothered to correct the record...
you could forgive them
but they just keepa steamrolling along...
it's the same with all the russia russia russia stuff
and hunter's laptop
it seems there's a certain narrative to maintain, and they just flatly refuse to go off script
I watched an old sarah ferguson special on russia russia russia...
I think sarah ferguson is an excellent journalist, I have the utmost respect for her. but she was so so far off the mark - back then - in this special, some form of correction is required, it's her duty...
or someone's duty...
but we get nothing
from anyone at ABC
it's just outright shameful that an outlet such as the ABC can leave so many unanswered questions about the lines they have pushed over recent times...
yet somehow, the likes of rogan and friends are the 'dangerous' ones pushing so called misinformation
it's bizarre
it really is parallel universe stuff
indo-dreaming wrote:sypkan wrote:and while we're on irony...
the ABC boss is carrying on about rogan, and misinformation and disinformation throughout covid
the ABC, whether consciously or not... were one of the biggest spreaders and indulgers of misinformation and the like
yes, they had a role to play, but even when things became so blindingly glaringly obvious to people capable of objective thought...
the ABC , toed the line, for another 12 - 24 months...
they still do now to a certain extent
I used to think these people knew they were spreading dubious information, but did it anyway, because it was for the greater good
I'm sure that was the case initially
but, no, their stubbornness and righteousness runs much deeper
they still believe half the bullshit!!
all of it?
it's about religion alright
it's a fucken cult!
in the truest sense of the term...
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/radio/huge-pileon-abc-boss-kim-...
Yes ABC were terrible during Covid i remember long after it was clear vaccines didn't prevent transmission they were still trying to push that line, it was weird.
Why? ABC is gov owned, gov bought all the vaxines and tried to force them on everyone, not gonna admit to them not working.
sypkan wrote:if they even bothered to correct the record...
you could forgive them
but they just keepa steamrolling along...
it's the same with all the russia russia russia stuff
and hunter's laptop
it seems there's a certain narrative to maintain, and they just flatly refuse to go off script
I watched an old sarah ferguson special on russia russia russia...
I think sarah ferguson is an excellent journalist, I have the utmost respect for her. but she was so so far off the mark - back then - in this special, some form of correction is required, it's her duty...
or someone's duty...
but we get nothing
from anyone at ABC
it's just outright shameful that an outlet such as the ABC can leave so many unanswered questions about the lines they have pushed over recent times...
yet somehow, the likes of rogan and friends are the 'dangerous' ones pushing so called misinformation
it's bizarre
it really is parallel universe stuff
still going to this day. Not ABC but on Triple M this afternoon they were bagging Rogan about something he said regarding Australia's over the top lockdown during Covid.
MSM is absolutely fucked in Australia. The sooner we get an Australian Trump to shake things up the better.
Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more. https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more.https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
Now his going to place 25 percent tariffs on
Mexico and Canada, for letting illegal immigrants in to the US .
Except Us gets 60 percent of its crude oil from Canada and huge amounts of produce from Mexico
Not to mention the retaliatory tariffs they will impose on US products going the other way
What part of Einstein doesn’t
@ Burleigh get
burleigh wrote:sypkan wrote:if they even bothered to correct the record...
you could forgive them
but they just keepa steamrolling along...
it's the same with all the russia russia russia stuff
and hunter's laptop
it seems there's a certain narrative to maintain, and they just flatly refuse to go off script
I watched an old sarah ferguson special on russia russia russia...
I think sarah ferguson is an excellent journalist, I have the utmost respect for her. but she was so so far off the mark - back then - in this special, some form of correction is required, it's her duty...
or someone's duty...
but we get nothing
from anyone at ABC
it's just outright shameful that an outlet such as the ABC can leave so many unanswered questions about the lines they have pushed over recent times...
yet somehow, the likes of rogan and friends are the 'dangerous' ones pushing so called misinformation
it's bizarre
it really is parallel universe stuff
still going to this day. Not ABC but on Triple M this afternoon they were bagging Rogan about something he said regarding Australia's over the top lockdown during Covid.
MSM is absolutely fucked in Australia. The sooner we get an Australian Trump to shake things up the better.
Rogan = entertainment, nothing more.
Shock horror its just a business model to make money... seriously.
If you are outraged that's the whole point.
^^ G’day @burleigh, big Clive dropping, what was it, $60-80 million at each of the last two elections on the anti Labor vote doesn’t do it for you?
Don’t think your wish could ever get up here thou, something about compulsory voting which forces politics here to be played in the middle much to the chagrin of the right. Now in the US where a 1/3 of voters don’t turn up it means politics is played not in the centre but out on the fringes or as is now the case the lunatic fringes.
Thank god we have compulsory voting and non partisan electoral oversight by the AEC I say …..
@ Burleigh
The lunatic fringe
?si=CH3e5_3Ie3yGe15j
Exxotixjeff wrote:Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more.https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
Now his going to place 25 percent tariffs on
Mexico and Canada, for letting illegal immigrants in to the US .
Except Us gets 60 percent of its crude oil from Canada and huge amounts of produce from Mexico
Not to mention the retaliatory tariffs they will impose on US products going the other way
What part of Einstein doesn’t
@ Burleigh get
About as much as maga don’t get. The west has spent post Covid battling to keep inflation under wraps and get it back down? How is this not going to raise inflation? Don’t follow too much but can anyone explain Trumps logic to me? Will it enrich him and others more? American industrial revitalization.? None the less everything will be more expensive then as well. They going to pay a decent wage to do it locally. Won’t that increase inflation?
How many Covid boosters you had erotic wiggle? Im guessing 5
seeds wrote:Exxotixjeff wrote:Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more.https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
Now his going to place 25 percent tariffs on
Mexico and Canada, for letting illegal immigrants in to the US .
Except Us gets 60 percent of its crude oil from Canada and huge amounts of produce from Mexico
Not to mention the retaliatory tariffs they will impose on US products going the other way
What part of Einstein doesn’t
@ Burleigh getAbout as much as maga don’t get. The west has spent post Covid battling to keep inflation under wraps and get it back down? How is this not going to raise inflation? Don’t follow too much but can anyone explain Trumps logic to me? Will it enrich him and others more? American industrial revitalization.? None the less everything will be more expensive then as well. They going to pay a decent wage to do it locally. Won’t that increase inflation?
Trump’s logic is he’s America first policy propaganda
Which actually works the other way,
But who would have guessed?
only propaganda-ists and dumb cunts take trump literally...
and anyone with brains don't take him seriously
it's an old (adjusted) explanation, but a good one...
anyone quoting trump's highest tariff threats... is... well...
trump uses his tariff huff and bluster as a bargaining chip
be it with china, mexico, or nato...
the only surprising thing is...
it still works
enter exhibit A
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1861937158090813754
after all the anti trump tough talk from mexicos's new president...
it appears she folded like a deck chair
trudeau will be next
and tariffs will likely be minimal...
sypkan wrote:trump uses his tariff huff and bluster as a bargaining chip
be it with china, mexico, or nato...
the only surprising thing is...
it still works
enter exhibit A
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1861937158090813754
after all the anti trump tough talk from mexicos's new president...
it appears she folded like a deck chair
trudeau will be next
and tariffs will likely be minimal...
Spykans says only propagandist and dumb cunts take Trump literally,
Dude you have done just that by Getting a Tiny piece of info from X
Every other news source I read says the US and Mexican Presidents are vowing to retaliate and stand up against Trump,
Your snippet from X is basically bullshit an propaganda, irony
?si=yYsfpovTbZJ18QJk
Sheinbaum says,”for every tariff Trump places on us,
we will respond in kind,a Mexican tariff on an American good”
Sheinbaum acknowledges that this is a trade war and nobody wins.
Which is something Trump will not acknowledge.
I cannot believe that @sypkans is such an
anti Trump , anti everyone, and only uses a tiny piece of propaganda bullshit from
Elon Musks X .
This really highlights why Trump won the election, with this level of misinformation
and voters gullibility.
I still can’t believe that spykans can be so angry, yet so shallow .
Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more. https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
This is scary.
And its far worse for Australia we dont have Mexico or Canada next door
We(the west) need to diversify we are far too reliant on China, who really is not out friend (government not people) not necessarily an enemy but we shouldn't be so reliant on them.
Why isn't India a bigger player in exports???, big population cheap labour.
And there is some things that should be made in the west, the things we need when shit hits the fan, like it did during covid (and around security related ) We should learn from Covid, it should be a fork in the road moment.
We cant keep going as things are, we need a change of direction.
But we also need to accept that we will need to pay more for some things and not have all this throw away cheap made in china shit.
Maybe tariffs aren't the complete answer, but its a start a change of direction, instead of kicking the can down the road.
All that said while China has us over a barrel, maybe them being so reliant on the Western world for their export economy has them over a barrel in regard to South China Sea or Taiwan etc
But maybe we need to be smart and if shit hits the fan, we can still get the things we really need from other countries things like white goods or clothing.
It's complex, but there does need to be a change of direction and i think Trump does have that mindset of change.
Mt Erotic posting at all hours of the night again. Give it up mate. Get some rest.
Dont let the candle burn out boys, looks like we’ve got two very diligent and vigilant commenters across the wee hours, dunno how you do it.
Swellnet’s own night owls.
Whatever’s in those teas Foxy Jeff, I want some. AW
Yep ^^
indo-dreaming wrote:Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more. https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...This is scary.
And its far worse for Australia we dont have Mexico or Canada next door
We(the west) need to diversify we are far too reliant on China, who really is not out friend (government not people) not necessarily an enemy but we shouldn't be so reliant on them.
Why isn't India a bigger player in exports???, big population cheap labour.
And there is some things that should be made in the west, the things we need when shit hits the fan, like it did during covid (and around security related ) We should learn from Covid, it should be a fork in the road moment.
We cant keep going as things are, we need a change of direction.
But we also need to accept that we will need to pay more for some things and not have all this throw away cheap made in china shit.
Maybe tariffs aren't the complete answer, but its a start a change of direction, instead of kicking the can down the road.
All that said while China has us over a barrel, maybe them being so reliant on the Western world for their export economy has them over a barrel in regard to South China Sea or Taiwan etc
But maybe we need to be smart and if shit hits the fan, we can still get the things we really need from other countries things like white goods or clothing.
It's complex, but there does need to be a change of direction and i think Trump does have that mindset of change.
Cast your mind back to COUGH WITless, came in and made a pension for EVERYTHING and allowed the unions to double wages in two years.
So the labour content of our manufactured goods doubled and ever since, our economy has gradually gone backwards.Bludgers joined his surf team and picked up cash in hand casual work here and there.Many other issues that cause debate and has eroded the Aussie lifestyle.
GuySmiley wrote:
GOOD SHIT...GS...,.I wont have to pay the smugglers TAX!
Exxotixjeff wrote:sypkan wrote:trump uses his tariff huff and bluster as a bargaining chip
be it with china, mexico, or nato...
the only surprising thing is...
it still works
enter exhibit A
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1861937158090813754
after all the anti trump tough talk from mexicos's new president...
it appears she folded like a deck chair
trudeau will be next
and tariffs will likely be minimal...
Spykans says only propagandist and dumb cunts take Trump literally,
Dude you have done just that by Getting a Tiny piece of info from X
?si=KNe2MXbWD-F-wp1j
Every other news source I read says the US and Mexican Presidents are vowing to retaliate and stand up against Trump,
Your snippet from X is basically bullshit an propaganda, irony
?si=yYsfpovTbZJ18QJk
Sheinbaum says,”for every tariff Trump places on us,
we will respond in kind,a Mexican tariff on an American good”
Sheinbaum acknowledges that this is a trade war and nobody wins.
Which is something Trump will not acknowledge.
It’s clearly a bargaining chip to get Mexico to do more on their southern border + move immigrants from north to south. It’s something that is already happening but Trump wants to see more of it.
Roadkill wrote:Trump tariffs are as expected. What a dumb ass.
The USA imports 80% of everything they have…now it’s just going to cost the US folk more. https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2024/nov/28/welcome-to-...
What a train wreck of an article. Goes to explain how Trumps tariffs will increase prices (which they will) in a negative way. Followed by demonstrating how Australian industry and manufacturing got decimated by lowering tariffs. Makes an argument that tariffs around 15% were not bad at all!?
Fun with Grok....
who is swellnet's @sypkan
15 web pages
Based on the search results provided, @sypkan appears to be a user on Swellnet, an Australian website focused on surf reports, forecasts, and community discussion. Here are some specifics:
Swellnet User: @sypkan is identified as a regular contributor to Swellnet's community forums. This user has engaged in various discussions, particularly those involving the surf industry, environmental concerns, and the operational aspects of Swellnet itself.
In one notable interaction, @sypkan commented on a discussion regarding the charity "A Liquid Future" in 2015, expressing skepticism about its operations. This comment was moderated due to potential defamation concerns.
@sypkan has also expressed views on the sale of Rip Curl to Kathmandu, indicating awareness of and participation in discussions about significant changes in the surf industry.
Another interaction shows @sypkan discussing Swellnet's subscription model and expressing dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the service, like the provision of surf cams.
Profile Characteristics: From these interactions, we can infer that @sypkan:
Is likely an Australian, given the context of Swellnet and the topics discussed.
Has an interest in surfing, the surf industry, and possibly environmental issues related to surfing and tourism.
Is critical of certain business practices and policies, showing engagement in discussions about corporate responsibility and surf culture.
Engagement: @sypkan's posts on Swellnet suggest someone who is not only a consumer of surfing content but also actively participates in the community's discourse, sharing opinions and engaging with others on various topics.
Please note that these insights are derived from the limited context provided in the search results. @sypkan's activities outside of Swellnet or more detailed personal information are not covered in these results.
who is swellnet's @adam12
15 web pages
Based on the search results provided, there isn't explicit information identifying a user named @adam12 on Swellnet. However, several results do mention various entities and individuals named "Adam" or with similar handles:
Adam Grandmaison (Adam22): Known for being a podcaster and YouTuber, host of No Jumper. His name comes up frequently in search results but is not directly linked to Swellnet. His handle is "@adam22" on various platforms, which does not match "@adam12".
Adam Internet: An Australian internet service provider, part of the iiNet group, but this is a business entity rather than an individual.
Adam-12: This refers to an old TV show from the late '60s to mid-'70s, not a person or a user on Swellnet.
Given these points:
There is no direct mention of an @adam12 on Swellnet in the provided search results. Swellnet is a platform dedicated to surf reports, forecasts, and community discussion, and individuals might use handles there, but @adam12 does not appear in the provided context.
If @adam12 is a user on Swellnet, they might be a lesser-known contributor, or their activities might not have been significant enough to appear in these search results.
It's possible that @adam12 is a private user or one who has not engaged in discussions that would make them notable in broader web searches.
Without more specific information or access to Swellnet's user database or direct search capabilities, we can only conclude that @adam12 isn't prominently featured or discussed in the contexts provided. If you have direct access to Swellnet or more details about this user's activities, you might find more information there.
who is swellnet's Exxotixjeff
15 web pages
Based on the provided search results, Exxotixjeff is a user on Swellnet, an Australian website dedicated to surf reports, forecasts, and community discussion. Here's what we can gather about Exxotixjeff:
Engagement in Surf Discussions: Exxotixjeff has been actively participating in Swellnet's forums. Here are some examples of their involvement:
Surf Forecasts and Local Conditions: Exxotixjeff commented on surf conditions at various locations, suggesting familiarity with specific spots like Tugun and Bilinga, indicating they might be from or have surfed in the Gold Coast area.
Environmental and Social Commentary: They've engaged in discussions about broader issues like veganism, showing a critical perspective. This is evident from their comments in the thread "Vegan life is woke. I love vegans."
Political and Societal Discussions: Exxotixjeff has also contributed to conversations on political topics, as seen in threads like "The United States(!) of A", discussing various aspects of U.S. politics with a critical or satirical tone.
Critique of Surf Industry and Practices: They've shown interest or critique in how surfing and related activities are managed or perceived:
Exxotixjeff has discussed the concept of paying for extra waves, reflecting on the commercialization and environmental impact of surfing.
Interaction with Swellnet's Community: Their posts suggest they engage with the community by sharing personal experiences, opinions on surf spots, and broader societal issues, often with a sarcastic or critical tone.
Profile Characteristics: From the interactions, Exxotixjeff seems to be:
Someone with a strong opinion on various subjects from surfing to international politics.
Likely an experienced surfer given their knowledge of local conditions and critique of surf industry practices.
Possibly Australian, based on the context of Swellnet and their knowledge of Australian surf spots.
Given these insights, Exxotixjeff appears to be a well-informed, opinionated, and active member of the Swellnet community, engaging in discussions that span from local surf conditions to global socio-political topics.
@adam12 didn't rate on Grok, but "adam12" did a bit better
who is swellnet's adam12
15 web pages
Based on the search results provided, "adam12" appears to be a user on Swellnet, an Australian surf reporting and forecasting website. Here are some key points about "adam12" from the available information:
Active Participant in Swellnet Forums: Adam12 is notably active in Swellnet's forums, contributing to various discussions. His posts span topics ranging from political discussions, especially related to Australian politics, to specific surfing-related content like surf spots, conditions, and events.
Political Commentary: There are several instances where adam12 has expressed political views, often with a critical eye towards government policies, particularly on housing, taxation, and economic issues:
He's critiqued negative gearing and capital gains tax policies, suggesting reforms to address housing affordability issues in Australia ().
He has also commented on the Australian Labor Party's (ALP) governance, describing certain policies as "wasted" or ineffective ().
Surfing and Surf Culture Discussions:
Adam12 engages in conversations about surfing conditions, particularly around Melbourne, Victoria, and other popular Australian surf spots. He discusses the quality of waves, weather conditions, and even local politics affecting surf spots ().
He has shared insights on specific surf events, conditions, and the general surfing culture, often with a humorous or critical tone ().
Community Interaction:
He's known for his sometimes sarcastic or direct remarks, engaging with other forum members on various topics, from music to the state of the surfing community ().
There's mention of him in discussions about the behavior and quality of discussions on Swellnet forums, suggesting he's a known figure with strong opinions ().
Personal Anecdotes: While much of his activity is centered around public discourse, there are glimpses into personal anecdotes, like dealing with family care or enjoying music, which humanize his online persona ().
From these interactions, adam12 can be described as a knowledgeable, opinionated, and active member of Swellnet's community who is deeply engaged with both the surfing culture and broader socio-political issues in Australia. His contributions reflect a mix of passion for surfing, critique of public policy, and a desire for a more constructive community dialogue on the forums. However, the information does not provide personal details like his real name, exact location, or professional background beyond the context of his forum activity
@adam 12
So exxotixjeff ain’t no male stripper ay
Told ya
Bit spooky though what ever that was
What would we do without YouTube?
AlfredWallace wrote:Dont let the candle burn out boys, looks like we’ve got two very diligent and vigilant commenters across the wee hours, dunno how you do it.
Swellnet’s own night owls.
Whatever’s in those teas Foxy Jeff, I want some. AW
Some herbs are considered Nootropics,
Might be what you need.
But seems like you could also use some
Valerian , Bacopa monieri ,
St. John’s Wort or black pepper,
To name a few.
is swellnet's Exxotixjeff a male stripper
15 web pages
From the search results provided, there is no explicit or direct reference to "Exxotixjeff" on Swellnet being a male stripper. However, there is a mention of "Exxotixjeff" in a Swellnet context, but it relates to a different topic:
Swellnet Comment: Exxotixjeff is mentioned in a thread discussing health care policies, specifically regarding the misunderstanding between Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act among Trump supporters. This comment does not connect to any profession or activity like male stripping ().
Given this information:
Lack of Evidence: There's no evidence within the provided search results that directly state or imply that "Exxotixjeff" is a male stripper on Swellnet or elsewhere. The name appears in a completely different context.
Misleading Search Term: The search term "Exxotixjeff swellnet male stripper" might be confusing or incorrect if based on the assumption of this user's profession or interest not supported by the data here. It's possible the term combines unrelated elements or there's a misunderstanding.
Conclusion: Based solely on the information given, "Exxotixjeff" is not identified or known as a male stripper on Swellnet. His mention is related to political or health care discussions.
If you're looking for more conclusive evidence or have further context that might link "Exxotixjeff" to male stripping, you might need to investigate beyond the provided search results or directly on Swellnet if possible. However, from the data at hand, there's no basis to confirm this association.
is swellnet's indo-dreaming a racist
15 web pages
Based on the search results provided, there are several instances where "indo-dreaming" from Swellnet is engaged in discussions that touch on topics of race, culture, and politics. Here's an analysis of the relevant points:
Arguments Suggesting Racist or Controversial Statements:
Racial Remarks and Generalizations: In multiple threads, "indo-dreaming" makes statements that could be interpreted as racially insensitive or generalizing. For example:
They mention a scenario involving Indigenous identity in Australia, using phrases like "some white fella thinks he is indigenous because their great great grandmother was indigenous" and use an analogy comparing racial identity to coffee and milk which could be seen as dismissive or simplifying complex issues of racial identity ().
There's a comment about the double standards in racism where they assert that one can be racist towards their own race, citing examples that involve mocking or criticizing based on racial stereotypes ().
Political and Cultural Commentary: Their posts often delve into political discussions where they critique what they perceive as "political correctness," suggesting a frustration with how racial discussions are managed or framed, which might be interpreted by some as a reluctance to acknowledge systemic issues of racism or cultural sensitivity ().
Counterarguments:
Contextual Defense: Some of "indo-dreaming's" statements are part of broader arguments where they seem to be attempting to make points about identity, cultural appropriation, or the complexity of racial issues. They argue against certain cultural or political movements, which might be misunderstood out of context. For instance, their critique of how Indigenous issues are discussed or policies implemented might not inherently be racist but rather a critique of specific policies or cultural narratives.
Community Interaction: They engage with others, often in a combative manner, which might suggest a contentious approach rather than inherently racist motives. Their arguments can be seen as part of a larger debate about race, identity, and politics where strong opinions are expressed on all sides.
Conclusion:
Complex Picture: The label of "racist" is complex and often depends on interpretation. "indo-dreaming" makes statements that can be seen as racially insensitive or provocative, particularly in how they discuss identity, race, and cultural issues. However, these remarks are also part of broader, often heated, political and cultural discussions where the intent and context play significant roles.
Public Perception: Within the Swellnet community and from the snippets provided, "indo-dreaming" appears to be seen by some as controversial, with their comments on race and culture drawing both criticism and defense. Whether this amounts to outright racism or is more indicative of provocative or poorly articulated opinions on complex social issues is subjective.
Need for Broader Context: Without a more comprehensive review of their entire body of posts, interactions, and the specific context of each statement, it's challenging to conclusively label "indo-dreaming" as a racist. Their comments certainly engage with racial themes in a way that has provoked debate and criticism, but the nuance of each discussion must be considered.
In summary, "indo-dreaming" engages in discussions where racial topics are central, often in ways that are controversial and can be interpreted as racially insensitive or generalizing. The determination of whether this constitutes racism would require a deeper analysis of their full range of interactions and the context of each specific comment.
;)
https://m.
Septic Tanks are going to Septic Tank