Have The Brazilians Got Legitimate Beef?
Granted that very few surfers give a shit about professional surfing, and an even tinier subset of that group care one iota about the comp in the pool - if so, feel free to kick out now - it's worth looking at the protestations of the leading lights of the Brazilian Storm and seeing if they have any legitimate beef with the WSL.
To start, going back to the proximate cause of the beef: the Men's Final between Italo and Griff. Rewatching it and the heats preceeding it I'm still stunned by the magnitude of the judging error.
Before I watched it, I went back to the Richie Porta judging explainer which the Woz released on the eve of the comp. In detail, Porta explained judges were “looking for turns that are going to separate the elite from the middle of the pack,” and that the key to high scores would be, “variety, powerful surfing, no mistakes and utilising all the sections,” as well as, “disappearing in the barrel for as long as you can be”.
Both Porta and Kelly Slater (during the nightsurf session) claimed that turns into the barrel - Slater called them “dramatic entries” - were also highly favoured by judges.
Based on that explainer and previous events, I'm still convinced the most egregious error was the 8.70 awarded for the first lefts ridden by both surfers. The variety, the skill, the power and progression from Italo all executed seamlessly was at least a point and half ahead of Colapinto.
That speaks perfectly to Gabe Medina's most defensible point (now labelled “unacceptable” in the WSL's only response so far):
“It’s clear that the judges’ assessment is now rewarding very simple surfing, incomplete transitions, and PROGRESSION and VARIETY is being completely taken out of the equation."
“The WSL urgently needs to clarify its criteria and apply fair judgement to preserve the evolution of the sport.”
In this case, absolutely spot on. Griff's wave was very simply surfed with very little variety and progression.
But more importantly, the judging needs to be comprehensible, especially for the surfers who are being judged.
If you can't get a comprehensible judging criteria happening at a repeatable man-made wave then you don't have a sport. You have an advertisement for a wave pool.
The rest of the diatribes from the Storm are whining, albeit elevated to almost high art with mournful silences and declarations of love and legacy etc etc and exhortations to use it as fuel for fulfilling human potential. All nonsense and expressions of solidarity.
Fair enough.
Yet six of the last eight world champions have been Brazilian, including current champ Toledo, and former champs Medina and Ferriera. Medina won the last comp at Margaret River, Toledo won at Sunset Beach.
Those facts should scuttle immediately any suggestions of anti-Brazilian bias, but it doesn't discount one of the main sources of the beef.
Incomprehensible judging.
If the criteria is shifting, away from progression and variety as Medina suggests, towards flow and transitions then that needs to be made crystal clear. Not made up on the fly and contradicting their own former head judge called into to explain it to Joe Public.
I cannot imagine grand conspiracy from a judging panel to get Griff a hometown final at Trestles. Others might.
The most generous, simple explanation is a subtle shift in judging that was not conveyed to surfers. Carissa Moore would be evidence for that position. Riss surfed every wave almost exactly the same. Same turns in the same places. According to Porta, she should have been docked points for repetition. Instead, judges went excellent for every single one of them. There was little variety and zero progression to behold.
If judging fashions are to change and it disadvantages what has heretofore considered the State Of The Art - Brazilian progression in other words - it's only fair and reasonable that those dedicating their life to the sport should be fully cognisant of those changes.
You can't just unilaterally decide that “Nah, we don't like that now, we like this” and not expect blowback from those affected. It does require urgent clarification.
As for the WSL running away and sticking its head in the sand until it all blows over, I do have to submit my solidarity with the Brazilian chorus: World Shame League.
Get out front and address this issue, Elo. That's your job, pal.
// STEVE SHEARER
Comments
Love your work Freeride.
Yep. This isn't about nations or nationalities.
It's purely about fairness (and my missing 600 bucks)
I disagree about it not having elements of grand conspiracy, but how could we ever know.
What i do know, is that when sports allow betting to take place, then human greed will find a way to manipulate results if there is even a slight door of opportunity open to it.
How that translates to anything that happened yesterday is probably negligible in this case, but i do reckon it's an element that's been largely overlooked in pro surfing.
It would have to be the easiest sport to slightly and knowingly manipulate a few results and give the heads up to a friend or relative to tip a few bucks a certain way. Or maybe they just tow the line to the betting agencies.
Who knows. But not hard to imagine conspiracies are at play after the blatant rip off yesterday.
I'd like to see a deeper dive into the betting element of pro surfing.
Nobody has touched it yet and it's a potential expose on all sorts of muck.
My personal take on yesterday though, was it was all American Pie, from the drunken crew poolside to the eventual winner.
There was no way they weren't going to push Cola through with the stars and stripes flavor of the comp.
They probably think they've finally made it in America, they'd be that fucken naive to what reality actually is. Ha!
Aaaaah! You thought you were betting on the surfers, didn't you know you were betting on the judges. ;)
haha. True that.
At least now i have experienced what it's like to be a passionate brazillian fan...minus the death threats of course.
Probably wouldn't care at all if i hadn't lost the equivalent of a chicken parmigiana and a schooner on it ;-)
Yep you are right. Not many surfers give a shit about pro surfers in a wave pool.
bang on the mark steve
i’ve watched the final a couple times again too and i just can’t see how griff got it
i don’t like to criticise, however my other gripe with judging is that i get really annoyed when something is deemed ‘incomplete’ when absolute risk has been taken vs something ridden thru at minimal juice -‘ nearly ‘ at full tilt is way better than getting home on the tram…it’s subjective of course but at times i feel there’s scope to reward effort, and that might help to stop safety surfing
Quote from Fr 'I cannot imagine grand conspiracy from a judging panel to get Griff a hometown final at Trestles. Others might.'
Well makes me wonder though, if that is the case do the judges all get together before the heat and whisper to each other that they have been instructed to get Griff over the line...mmm hard to imagine that happening but it explains the scoring ..something stinks in lemoore besides the cow shit
Like any Hometown Advantage sometimes the crowd can sway the Ref and get the home team over the line. Im sure the cheers for Griff were louder than those for Italio. The reverse probably applies in Brazil
Thats Sport 101.
"Something stinks in Lemoore besides the cow shit."
Love this line. :)
At least when it comes to flogging merch - but probably a bunch of other avenues as well - a US world champ is worth a shit load more than a Brazilian one. Even people in Idaho will know the name Colapinto.
Russel Crowe put it best about the bunnies - I didn’t buy them to lose money. Elo decided it’s time to recoup his losses.… or not.
As much as I prefer the aesthetics of Ethan’s and Griff’s surfing, I have to admit that, based on the WSL’s judging criteria, Gabriel’s and Italo’s surfing was superior. It’s not fair to shift the goal posts without informing the players. If the judges are leaning towards a more Ewing-esque style of surfing, then they should make it known. I’m sure the Brazilians have the skill and hyper-competitive nature to adapt and thrive.
Brazilian motivation to succeed is everywhere in their local news, stories & possibly witnessed on the way to some town beach or the Rio airport...
&t=8sReference
Medina was surfing quite stiff and rushed compared to Ethan and I usually favour goofy surfers being one myself.
Separately, the judging criteria is crap, we've seen them give out high scores just for multiple backhand snaps on one wave, any good surfer can backhand snap all day. For this comp they should just be pushing for progression and awarding advanced manoeuvres done well, it's boring as anything in its current format.
“(now labelled “unacceptable” in the WSL's only response so far)”
Where did you find a WSL response? Surprised they’ve even addressed it.
See last passage:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-30/australian-surfer-ethan-ewing-rec...
Steve where did the WSL respond?
I was waiting for Carissa to be brought up. I couldn’t be bothered comparing her surfing with others in the pool, too boring, but my gosh, she’s just tapping it, so repetitively. Dead set didn’t get much more than 60% . Super, safety surfed and the judges give her 8.60’s and the likes.
I agree with the Brazilian sentiment also. Not that there’s some kind of conspiracy, but their surfing was more dynamic. This doesn’t pass the pub test. In other years Italo or Gabe would’ve progressed for sure.
Feels like a tipping point. Are the WSL actually going to have to do something or do they continue to piss off every stakeholder in the game by virtue of their silence and lack of transparency?
It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. Elo is not a big man.
The Wozzle establishment is waving the middle finger as usual.
In here:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-05-30/australian-surfer-ethan-ewing-rec...
So 'unacceptable' would generally infer some kind of consequence.
I wonder what if any consequences will come Gabby's way.
Can't imagine he'd be the sort of fella to take kindly to any kind of sanctioning or fines.
Or is 'unacceptable' just another fluffy phrase thrown out by woz that has zero merit or substance, as per all the other dribble that they pump out.
The WSL is just like the WWE: a travelling circus with rigged results. Unfortunately, it’s less entertaining.
Gabby, Italo etc. have been getting juiced for years.
Now they're not getting so juiced, and the judges are finally starting to take the 'Flow' portion of the criteria into account.
That does not equal a legitimate beef.
Also, spare me with the notion that having a jerky crappy style is progressive in any way, or that only airs are progressive.
Count me in.
Style is super subjective. Airs are not. Case in point, I can't do airs and pretty much any surfer that can is better at surfing then me. Judging needs to be as objective as possible. Like how they do with skating.
Also not only airs are progressive, if day surfing switch is, but the judging doesn't seem to reward that either.
I will probably get roasted for this but as a package, I think pro-surfing has improved under the WSL in terms of how it is presented to the public. Of course you have to cut through the cheese but the delivery and production has been really good the last few years.
There will always be questionable judging decisions especially in the real ocean but that Griff/Italo decision still leaves me baffled. It was just so obvious that Italo won and I can't find anything on the contrary.
Like Lewis Hamilton said ‘the results been manipulated man‘.
I just watched the replays again, and really can't see what everybody is crying about.
Griff did better turns, and had better flow between those good turns.
No question Griff is an amazing surfer and definitely a title contender but in this instance Stamos, I have to respectfully disagree. Based purely on the judging criteria (outlined in the article above) Italo surfed with more aggression, more progression, more variation and spent longer in the tube. Griff surfed well but I have to agree he surfed safely and not what he was capable of. Basically Carissa with an extra chromosome.
Both of them did a lot of meh turns and manoeuvres.
If you want to see the difference, look at the turns leading into the barrels on the lefts, and then all the turns between the 2 barrels on the rights.
That's where Griff won it.
I did as you suggested and for a start, neither of them did what I would consider ‘meh‘ turns.
But I stand by what I wrote and we'll just have to agree to disagree.
An extra chromosome???
Another species?
Oh alright BF, I was trying to be clever- 23 pairs of chromosomes in men and women, 22 identical. The sex chromosomes XX in chicks and XY in blokes. So technically not an extra chromosome. But a Y in blokes (gotta be a joke in there somewhere). I was trying to say Griff surfed like Carissa as in not at his full potential but still got the win.
Sheesh.
Come on BF, people with an extra chromosome are not another species.
i’m with you zen
This is just it isn’t it? On such a perfect canvas, with elite talent, it’s always going to be so hard to split and as we’ve seen mighty subjective.
I remember one of the comps a few years ago at Keramas, where I think Parko might have surfed a perfect heat (or near). The waves were so mechanical and near perfect that it was nearly impossible to split the top tier crew.
The beauty really is in the eye of the beholder when it’s this close.
There’s probably a bee’s dick’s difference between talent in the top 10 or so. When you take out the environment, variation in waves, luck, heat strategy you are left with pure talent and the ability to deploy this under pressure. When you have a couple of blokes who can do that, how do you say who wiggled down the wave better?
Motivation, experience & the best equipment can get results.... in theory
It seems to me that in this particular wave pool that judging could be done with a well written algorithm, using the footage,
Therefore no arguments against shitty judging,?
100%. Artificial wave - why not artificial judges. They have automated wave filming at the wave pool in Melbourne. - algorithm can identify individual surfers, crop them out and assemble all their waves into clips (Check https://flowstate.zone/ ) . Golf apps can analyse your swing so recognising movement patterns is possible.
Actually what might be an interesting project would be to take the wave footage from the pool event and train an AI to recognise elements of the published scoring criteria. Then run it over various waves to see what the outcome would have been if they'd stuck to the criteria. This is pretty doable I'd say. There are tons of AI services offering demos at the moment. Maybe Freeride 76 can marshal some geeks?
Italo has been underscored all year. The air at Margie's? Must have rooted someone's missus or something.
Surfing is screaming out for progression IMO and it should be rewarded. Then again, who cares? Go watch YouTube surfers, they're heaps more entertaining.
He got a 9 for that air. For a single manoeuvre.
How is that possibly underscored?
Hi Stamos, I believe juegasiempre is talking about Italo's air going left against Ethan Ewing. The score was a 6 something, I think...
The chop-hop on the fat left?
Wow. Ok. If someone is using that as an example of Italo being underscored, I don't know what to say?
Yeah, in my comment I didn't mean to say the score was right or wrong. I was just saying that's what I *thought/believed* juegasiempre was referring to in his comment.
Agreed......i see much more 'progressive' surfing from 16yr olds at dbah on any given day
Only place where the ct get scored well for surfing to thier limit is pipe and chopes
The heat between Medina and Chianca at WA this year showed how aggressive and in your face Brazilian pros are. Those two were virtually fist fighting in the water as they tried to paddle over each other. I think the only reason no one got an interference is that they were both doing it as bad as each other.
The statement below is a generalization and not all Brazilian pros are like this but......
Brazilian Pro Surfing mentality = Win at ANY cost. Sell your Grandma if you need to. Just make sure you win as that's the only thing that matters in life.
Medina V Chianca
https://www.worldsurfleague.com/posts/515388/margaret-river-pro-mens-sem...
As another person so elegantly wrote yesterday. They will eat their own just as quickly.
Well said , I agree 100%.
I Didn’t watch a single heat until the final.
Watched it on my own with no reference of past heats. I walked away at the end stunned that Italo didn’t get the win.
I was confused and I’m a fan.
Well the drama is good for click bait and articles to get the readers fired up and discussing.
This is article number 4? On a comp that no one cared about? And FR was going to sum it up in 1 article only, as anything more was unnecessary?
We're a subscription site, mate. The number of clicks dont mean shit to us.
Steve has written about every day of CT competition the last few years. When a CT story reaches all the major mastheads in Oz MSM then it's fair to say there's something worth discussing.
Four articles, and you've said the same obtuse thing in each of them. Why not take your own advice and sum it up in one?
(Yes, we all know the answer to that.)
Something worth discussing?
Every event the wsl runs has something worth discussing…yet we always get how shit the wsl is.
If they ain’t talking about you, they ain’t talking about you.
WSL will be loving the drama.
I didn't think you'd be savvy enough to pick up on it.
Mate, for all your complaints, you've made yourself 'part of the drama'.
Don't want that? Then STFU.
Off course I know that…I love the WSL drama.
Happy to contribute.
I have said before I am a WSL comp fan boy. I always say the comps deliver and this one did also. (Even though I also fell for the not worth it camp).
You seem to be taking my comments as a direct crticism of SN or FR….which is not correct.
"You seem to be taking my comments as a direct crticism of SN or FR….which is not correct."
No, more so the patronising attitude to anyone commenting - i.e Swellnet readers - when you're doing the very same thing.
You are also free to attack me personally. No big deal.
Meaning..?
Meaning..? Meaning nothing really. Forums are for discussion and a bit of achy bargy. I guess as the site owner you get to decide what the standard is.
I admit I have been guilty of bringing a low level in the past but have tried to not go to that level since being advised not to.
Nobody cares about the wavepool event generally, but this somehow ended up all across the major news sites which is extremely rare for surfing, so it's obviously an issue of interest
LoL!!
Brazilian storm in a teacup. Gabe and Italo have been massively overscored for years, as the 6 out of 8 world titles would attest. Now and then it doesn't go their way and the make it this stupid rest-of-the-world is against us garbage. Suck it up princesses, no doubt your turn is coming again soon in Rio - and at two-foot Trestles.
The Brazzo's have had their balls been tickled by the WSL for years ...its a nice change to see the "rub of the green" go against them for a change...Enjoy your win Griff you deserved it!
Like Zen I think they've done well with the presentation.
I'll always favour style, however the right in the replay I thought Italo was doing manoeuvres faster, more critical, in the tube longer and did so with style and flow.
OK the Margs airs - when you use the whole wave to go straight to set up a huge air reverse on the dangerous end section, do you really use the wave to it's potential? I can see an underscore on that one, and thought it was a bit of a hail Mary to get an awe imposing single move score at the time. He later did an air on the left, which was functional and connected multiple turns on the wave too - I'd judge that one higher, ironically! Here, the wave was used to it's potential.
There's been a pushback as the huge air reverses were used to win heats reminiscent of 'points per move'. I like the emphasis on style and flow and reckon this is relatable to most of us. There's also an emphasis on how much you can commit the rail, that speaks to Aussie power surfing and JJF is the master of this.
"Griff's wave was very simply surfed with very little variety and progression."
Where do you guys get the idea that any of the Pros are surfing in a simple way?
Surfing with such speed, power and grace is NOT simple at all.
Why is Ethan Ewing most pro surfer's favorite surfer? Because he can do amazing things with style, grace and flow which is NOT simple at all.
Same thing happened with Parko who was usually underscored because he made difficult things look simple/easy.
1000%
x 2
"Woz released on the eve of the comp. In detail, Porta explained judges were “looking for turns that are going to separate the elite from the middle of the pack,” and that the key to high scores would be, “variety, powerful surfing, no mistakes and utilising all the sections,” as well as, “disappearing in the barrel for as long as you can be”."
Looks like they didn't play to this script. Italo showed much more variation and longer tube rides..
Thanks for your time Craig.
Agreed that Italo showed more variation and getting deeper tubes.
But did he surf more powerfully? Did he make no mistakes? {as per the other criteria you mention?}
I think the hardest thing to comprehend is what do the judges find more important as there are quite a few things they are looking for [as you stated]
Is variation worth more points than power?
Is power worth more points that seamless mistake-free surfing?
Is bla, bla worth more points than bla bla.....you get the idea.
I can't see how anyone can definitively say who Won, unless we can put an objective answer to those questions.
Seems it's up to the judges alone to decide if one one criteria is worth more points than the other? and maybe they take all of those criteria into consideration and spit out a number that cannot be broken down into it's components.
Surfing is a completely subjective sport so I fail to see how anyone can wave around an Objective right/wrong win/loose argument.
Good points, but I reckon he did show more power and aggression compared to Griff. Griff looked like he held back a little then started to open up a bit more as the wave progressed. Italo attacked from the outset.
Plus the tube time.
That's one thing that can be judged completely objectively with a stop watch and he got tubed twice as long as Cola.
" Disappearing in the barrel for as long as you can be" There it is! Gabe dodged the barrel on the left to gain speed for an air and was scored according to the criteria.Also, for those saying he was making a statement for all Brazilians, from what I've see there is no love lost between he and Italo so it's probably all about himself. Italo's snap to air drop , straight into the barrel was gold and that alone should have given him the win.
Italo also made more mistakes, and had less flow
This year was always going to be USA VS AUS. Two new wholesome golden boys Griff & Jack. The bad boys from Brazil have had their day. Scripted on the desk of the billionaire who owns the WSL.
ELo has written a chastising reply to Gab on the Woz site….
""However, it is unacceptable for any athlete to question the integrity of our judges who … are elite professionals."
WSL is great entertainment, bad response though IMO.
The judges could have penned their decision for all to read being that is clearly a very controversial.
Correct.
A lot of this could have been diffused if the head judge could have broken down the rides and conveyed how the result was acheived.
But, all we get is silence or how questioning their integrity is unacceptable.
Spell it out to us WSL.
When Gabe, Italo and Felipe were getting >8.5 or >9 for a take-off + two speed pumps + close-out air reverse a couple of years back it got pretty boring, stale and one-dimensional
I welcome the effort to try and re-emphasise flow etc and generally I think it’s freshened things up
Maybe the pendulum has swung back too far - I’m not sure, I would say generally no …
I do agree with the consensus, that given the judging criteria and narrative italo was underscored on this occasion and I think he and others should be free to call this out
I also agree that the WSL top brass are cowardly in the way they go silent and hide whenever they’ve a mistake is made … or worse try to bury the mistake in endless corpo-speak and toxic positivity
Where I feel differently to most is on the net effect of WSL involvement - as a life long free surfer who never really competed at all, I still I find elite comp surfing interesting and entertaining to follow.
When the surf brands stepped back and the WSL/ziff family stepped in … they rescued pro-surfing … without them we would have nothing like the quality we have available now and it’s cost them millions. I buy the ziff’s motivational narrative - that they fell in love with the act and spectacle of surfing. I think it’s reasonable that they want a. Break even or reasonable return in capital financial return. I don’t like the cheese and understand the push-back against growth in or wave-linited sport, but II think their net contribution has been positive. I also think the meritorious elements of the anti growth argument often seem to get extended and twisted here and elsewhere into a small minded ‘only for me, my friends, my locality’ mindset that I can’t abide. Having loved the experience of surfing my entire life, it makes me so happy to see another person get tuned into the same joyful ride I have been so incredibly lucky to catch
I think you’ll see the judging pendulum swing back to centre over coming events as part of a natural refinement and improvement process and guess we’ll all have something to say regardless
Thanks alk
Nice one NDC.
Very well put!
Guideline:
as well as, “disappearing in the barrel for as long as you can be”.
"Both Porta and Kelly Slater (during the nightsurf session) claimed that turns into the barrel - Slater called them “dramatic entries” - were also highly favoured by judges."
Italo had an extra long tube on his first right and the entry into the second barrel straight out of an off the top was fairly dramatic. Dynamic turns in between. He did what was asked. I thought his first wave was also underscored based on the above.
But a really long barrel at the pool is actually a bit boring to the viewer (and judges) whereas in the ocean, for the surfer, there is the amazement that in all the randomness of swell and bathymetry, mother nature managed to create sustained perfection for 5 or 10 fleeting seconds. Like a monkey somehow painting the Mona Lisa - you go "wow" at the rarity and unexpectedness of the event !
So, judges may say they score barrels highly at the pool, but human nature takes hold watching the unexciting nose of a surfboard poking out of a predictable tube for a long time and they underscore it.
I agree with BL. Sometimes you can't compare live judging to watching the camera work at home.
I agree with BL. Sometimes you can't compare live judging to watching the camera work at home.
I find the scoring system in surfing pretty intriguing, not the scores themselves but what the ‘sport’ claims to consider in an attempt to objectively justify their decision.
The criteria is speed, power, flow, variety, major manoeuvres in critical sections (am I missing any?).
But they speak about the ‘criteria’ as though it’s some kind of objective rubric.
In reality you’ve got half a dozen blokes watching a 5sec- 1 min performance and in a manner of a couple of minutes have to spit out a number. There’s no way they can self compute numbers against their so called criteria.
I believe it’s probably more of an instinctual ‘feel’ sort of a process. All of us life long surfers and watchers of pro surfing can have a crack at it and most circumstances get within a point of the professional judges. As the saying goes, ‘you don’t have to be a baker to know the bread tastes good’.
I reckon most of us would be happier if Pritamo came out and just said ‘it was the vibe’ or ‘she ripped harder’, cause that’s all it is really.
There’s many layers of context and unconscious bias in each decision to go with which surfer appeared to wiggle the most / biggest at first glance.
It’s no one’s fault. It’s just the vibe…..
Is there a waft of LIV surfing in the air?....Kelly might be the man to take it back to a dream tour
Caarn Kelly!! You know you want to.
Just after locking the WSL into a three year deal to run wave pool events on the top tier tour, just to completely screw them
Come on now, all three Brazilians have plenty of examples whereby they benefited form dodgy scores form judges. But crickets form you lot. They continue to exhibit pure poor sportsmanship and bad behaviour when they don't get their way. They need to pull their heads in, like a lot of surf fans.
Like all professional sports athletes should be held to account for their actions, and with Medina, fuck me of all people, wrote that open letter garbage he has fueled the tin foil hat brigade so prevalent in surfing and now we have Ethan receiving death threats from "passionate' sic lunatic Brazilians surf fans.
Absolute beat up of a story.
Can someone please enlighten me on what Medina has said compared to what Joel Tudor said about the lack of longboarding events put on by the WSL, which subsequently got him immediately banned (and probably still is banned?).
IMO Medina off his own back has brought the 'pinnacle' of professional surfing into disrepute, however there has been no fine, ban or action from the WSL?
Very good point Ryder.
WSL will need to be very careful to avoid a double standard with regard to Joel's recent and very public reprimand. If that happens, I'm sure Joel will let us know :)
I think he said ‘meu cachorro nao sabe surfa‘.
But my Portuguese is a little rusty.
Zen classic
Hard to decipher but I'm sure he stood tall and said this a couple of times too.
" Eu sou o rei lagarto !! "
haha
Let's face it the Brazzo's are radical but there style is unpleasant to watch.
Ethan compared to Medina on a wave is like chalk and cheese.
Ethan all style, grace and power, Medina surfs like a meth head on his last wave before going to prison. The claiming is just obnoxious and points should be deducted.
Bad style?
Miguel Pupo? Mateus Herdy? Victor Bernardo? Yago Dora?
Bit tough when you throw out lines like "their style".
I thought Italo's style had improved a bit-until the airs when the landings are amazing but quite ungainly. The idea of progression is a bit questionable. The way EE is turning and where he is positioning himself seems more progressive to me than a lot of the above the lip stuff. Airs aren't by definition 'progressive' . Or are they. One surfer's risk is another's easy.
I like the Ranch comp, at least when the cream rises to the top. The Ranch is a different competition, with a set amount of waves, therefore requires a different judging criteria, which would include "risk". When Gabriel (vs Ethan) takes to the air three times on one wave and Ethan takes to the air zero times, the score must be at least 1.5 points more for the three risky airs.
Then there is the judging scores. The judges at the Ranch simply handed out too many 8+ point rides. 8 points means "excellent".
Judging scale:
[0.0 — 1.9: Poor]
[2.0 — 4.9: Fair]
[5.0 — 6.4: Good]
[6.5 — 7.9: Very Good]
[8.0 — 10.0: Excellent]
"If you can't get a comprehensible judging criteria happening at a repeatable man-made wave then you don't have a sport. You have an advertisement for a wave pool". Loved this.. the key is all here.
Have The Brazilians Got Legitimate Beef?
hmmm you may have to ask their Girlfriends that personal question...lol
My grammar is terrible but shouldn't there be an {a} in that sentence so my mind does not have to think about what the Brazilians have under their boardshorts? ..lol
Have the Brazilians got (a) Legitimate Beef?
Think that's how it's used in the King's English.
'i say Camilla darling I've got a legitimate beef'
Haha you two! Thats gold
'Oh Charles darling, I fancy a bit of Spotted Dick to go with my Yorkshire Pudding'.
'Coming Matron'.
Practically writes itself.
or black pudding :0
'Charles darling, I'd like the full English breakfast'.
'Coming my little bubble and squeak'.
Told you- writes itself.
Full English breakfast, lol.
speaking of legitimacy issues
Glad we resurrected this forum to something more sane and reasonable. hahaha
onya mate, we'll all be back soon for another round of stacks on the wsl
Pretty hard to argue with that comparison.
Stamos will find a way no doubt.
If you think all 'snap turns' are the same, then what's the point of arguing?
All 5 judges gave Griff's wave a higher score. The video shows why.
I don't think all snap turns are the same and I personally thought Italo's were sharper, faster and more critical. Helped of course being on his backhand.
Yes, the judges agreed with you. 99% of armchair watchers didn't. I guess on paper that makes you right. But when I watched the final, re-watched the replays a couple of times and the comparisons, I still can't see how Griff got the gong.
For the record, I like the way both surf, probably moreso Griff.
99%?
Don't be silly
Alright- the majority.
Don't be pedantic.
Lol.
Got any proof?
That you're pedantic?
See above.
Lol.
Stamos your earlier argument said that the video doesn't really do it justice due to different angles etc.
probably should adjust the first line from very few surfers give a shit about professional surfing to
- very few older surfers few surfers give a shit about professional surfing and the younger ones mostly only watch if their addicted to screen time. Which brings me to my next point; being there live EE and GC's waves looked better than the Storms's.....but watching the filmed replays I see why the debate is on and why Medina feels the need to make that statement the way he did. The odd run of getting dudded on scores though is across the board and been happening indiscriminately ? since Taj v Kelly heats.
Brazilians fairly regularly overscored imho. I often wonder if the judges are worried about the garbage carry on. Gymnastic tricks are not necessarily progressive surfing. I respect we all have subjective likes and thank god for that, but to me the flippin and spinning is generally a bit boring. Wish I could do it but watching is so ho-hum to me. I think Ewing beat Medina. I do think Italos right was surfed with serious style and power and was at least 0.5 points ahead of Griffs. Understand why he felt he won. Overall actually enjoyed some of the pool surfing for once.
When the waves are almost identical, one remarkable difference is Italo's death-stare theatrics on every wave that he manages to complete. When he - and other surfers with that entitled mindset - all but demand the points with their greedy claims, it must negatively influence the judges.
It seems to me that there is an unspoken criteria of good-sportspersonship: Maybe only a point in it, but those petulant competitors are penalising themselves over and over again.
The judges should just articulate it: If you demand the points in an ugly, unsportspersonship display that is bad for business - then you're not going to get them.
exactly
Brazilians all need to realise ..Just because you do the most fanatical passionate claims doesn’t mean you won..
.
Or maybe the judges are just scoring good SUP surfing for some reason now.
Who would be influencing that ,I wonder.
How many surfers have been dudded in heats from the judges over scoring Medina, Toledo and Italo's Favela spins (Air Reverse) Didn't hear any pissing and moaning coming from the Brazzo's then!!
Pay per view alternative tour. C'mon Kelly.
As we are probably all aware, watching surfing live with the naked eye is quite different to watching it on TV.
The judges are expected to give a score as soon as possible after each wave, so quite often, turns that looks big to huge live may look a bit underwhelming on TV replays and this is why I believe Ethan got the nod over Gabey.
With Grif and Italo, the judges have come to expect Italo going to the air so it's a bit ho hum nowadays when he does it (not that it makes it less dynamic, just predictable), they see a point of difference with Grif's surfing and probably award him accordingly.
I personally think both heats were close and wasn't that surprised with either outcome.
One thing is for sure, WSL have got extra mileage out of the whole show with all the talk on social media !
How do the say...........even bad publicity is good publicity !!
There is no question that both surfers smashed it, they both surfed extremely well and so it comes down to a super tiny focus points. My son and I watched it over and over and broke it down, we spent ages on each turn comparatively. At the end of that my son gave it to Italo and I gave it to Griff. My rationale is that Griff takes the bottom turn deeper with more top end power from that line, Italo has more speed and keeps his speed by pulling it from a slightly (very slightly) lower bottom turn and generates whipping speed. I felt Griff had the edge, same with Medina and Ethan, no question both surfed beyond excellent and it was no surprise it came down to more or less a draw.
Do I think that I am right, no way! guess what's? its an opinion and this is a judged sport and trying to elicit absolute exactness with it is folly.
Its like cricket, its is not if you are actually out, it is 'does the umpire think you are out', then they started using technology and cameras to rule out the mistakes, but guess what, that still leads to controversy and confusion and yet cricket is clearer and easier to umpire than surfing, as its a game based purely on rules.
Surfing is more like judging art work and what do we think is better, remember it used to be longest ride and most turns, which has kind of snuck back with the wave pool. In most other locations 2 massive hacks or one air can win, and letting the wave go unridden for a hundred meters will score better than riding the entire wave. As non-competitive surfers we would judge that as heresy, imagine going too hard to impress someone and then leaving miles of perfect face?? shocking behaviour, but in the wave pool we are seeing judging for not completing the wave now??
My son and I really like Gab, we surfed with him at Bells one year when we were out there and some pros came out, he's a great guy and was super nice, I have no preference on who wins, sure I am an Aussie and so sometimes find it hard to be objective, but I think the wave pool is the hardest to judge.
Perhaps we should give more credit to those people who do this professionally regularly, the judges, perhaps they are a bit more skilled sometimes.
What is NOT okay is threatening the surfers lives, that is NOT on!
Someone hand out the violins , Ethan beat Gabe on the second run . Pity there wasn't an Italo dummy spit the bloke carries on kind a pork chop .
Is Italo’s style even worse free surfing? Seriously, this is awful
https://fb.watch/kZh0GkDk3f/?mibextid=5Ufylb
So, no word still from judges and co on break down of the scores in question?