The Imperfect Storm: An Analysis

Ben Matson picture
Ben Matson (thermalben)
Swellnet Analysis

So, what happened to yesterday's south swell in Sydney?

Following an extended period of tiny Tasman energy, our new swell was expected to arrive early Tuesday morning, peaking for a brief period with five-to-six feet waves at exposed south facing beaches before easing into the afternoon.

Unfortunately, the swell was smaller than expected, arrived later than forecast and eased more rapidly than predicted.

Actually, some locations did quite well on Tuesday. Despite the meagre offerings along the Northern Beaches, Cronulla picked up good four feet waves mid morning. So too did a number of other locations in the Hunter region, as per today's Wave Of The Day. And up on the North Coast, six foot sets were reported at Yamba and Ballina for the afternoon session.

However, the swell bypassed just about every major Sydney beach - even some of the more reliable swell magnets saw just a fraction of the size compared to those few locations where the swell actually delivered.

The problem with specific size forecasting for such weather systems is that small changes to computer model output can drastically alter potential wave size. We were consistent with our five-to-six feet call for this swell from the outset, originally predicting this size range the Monday prior (eight days out) even though the computer models were initially way over the top with estimates of ten feet plus surf, and more.

As the computer models slowly downgraded their forecasts over the coming week to be more inline with our predictions, it was thought that they'd finally stabilised their estimates over the weekend.

To a degree, this was true - however the actual developments within the low pressure system itself were knife-edge for Sydney's swell potential - south swells are notoriously fickle in their beach alignment, and this was quite evident on Tuesday with such a wide range of wave heights between Ulladulla and Seal Rocks.

In hindsight, I believe the responsible low pressure system developed too quickly to generate any notable size for Sydney, and its rapid track to the southeast - which was discussed on Monday's notes - exacerbated these effects. It seems that the primary fetch around the low was more south-west than south, with the resulting outer bands of swell energy briefly glancing the swell magnets enroute to New Caledonia and Fiji.

A secondary front behind the low resulted in a similar, renewed coverage of directional south swell today - exposed Sydney beaches are barely picking up two feet, while it's four feet in Newcastle. South facing beaches up on the North Coast are seeing five foot sets this morning, even though it's further away from the swell source than Sydney - this phenomena in itself requires a technical explanation that I won't go into here.

In the case of Sydney, there's unfortunately no real way of knowing the specific directional nature of incoming swells. This most recent event is certainly one of the more extreme examples.

The benefit of hindcasting these kinds of events is that our surf forecasting knowledge-bank is further built upon, meaning we'll be able to reference this event in the coming months and years when a similar low pressure system develops to our south. Hopefully next time it'll hang around a little longer and give us the bigger waves we all hope for! //BEN MATSON

Comments

barstardos1's picture
barstardos1's picture
barstardos1 Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 1:05am

Thanks Ben, I was cursing you and your forecast at dawn yesterday. By this morning I was ready for disappointment. However you know how sometimes it's better than it looks - today was it was worse (and it looked bad!).

batfink_and_karate's picture
batfink_and_karate's picture
batfink_and_karate Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 1:26am

An interesting event Ben. We'll all forgive you if you can just rustle up a few days of nice clean 3 - 4 foot swell for the post xmas period.

Ben, Ben? Where are you?

Anyways, fyi Ben, a local south swell bombie magnet was completely missed by yesterday's swell. It always picks up every south swell, and usually magnifies it, and it was pretty quiet out there yesterday.

donweather's picture
donweather's picture
donweather Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 1:36am

South facing beaches up on the North Coast are seeing five foot sets this morning, even though it's further away from the swell source than Sydney - this phenomena in itself requires a technical explanation that I won't go into here.

I was under the impression from the title of this article that that's exactly what was going to be discussed here?

Be interested in perhaps a Part 2 article that sheds your light on the above Ben?

thermalben's picture
thermalben's picture
thermalben Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 2:04am

Don - this was a quick article to explain what happened yesterday, as there was nowhere else to put it in our surf report section. Also, Northern Beaches surfers seemed to have no idea that it was actually 4ft at Cronulla and the Central Coast (let alone 6ft up north). So, a quick article was the best choice.

We're currently down staff at the moment (Craig's just got out of hospital, and I'm on the road), but I'll see if I can whip one up over the next few days. For what it's worth, the feedback we've received in the past suggests most people aren't interested in a super technical analysis anyway - they just want to read a brief overview and hear if it was the same story up and down the coast.

freeride76's picture
freeride76's picture
freeride76 Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 2:29am

I was surprised at how sizey it got in Ballina yesterday arvo.

Normally swell shadowing from the Hunter restricts S swell size from close range systems during the intial phases.
(that unruly S swell last Jan where Vooey got to 10-12ft was 3-4ft at Ballina).

Lot to learn from these Tasman lows: they are fickle, idiosyncratic beasts.

donweather's picture
donweather's picture
donweather Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 2:55am

No worries Ben....I wasn't suggesting Part 2 had to come today.....just thought the article was going to be a hindcasting exercise when it didn't really come across as that.

Steve, if you want my opinion, I'm wondering if radial spreading has something to answer when it comes to this particular system. I'll try and explain that in a few simple sentences. We all agree the biggest component of the fetch was SW in direction and in fact the head of this SW fetch was probably just south of the Sydney region (I think from memory off the charts). So this swell headed parallel to the coast (or even slightly away offshore) to a certain extent close to the storm system, bypassing Sydney directly, but as you went further north (away from the storm system), the swell was able to travel further away from the source and bend back (radial spread) better into the coastline north of Sydney (noting that the coastline north of Sydney actually extends eastwards as well). I hope I'm explaining myself here?

Finally, Ben, I note that you've referenced 6ft waves up north...not sure how far north you were referring to, but Steve indicated in another forum that he surfed 4ft+ waves at a south facing beach yesterday?

thermalben's picture
thermalben's picture
thermalben Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 3:05am

Don, our Yamba reporter said it was 6ft in his neck of the woods y'day.

donweather's picture
donweather's picture
donweather Wednesday, 22 Dec 2010 at 3:14am

Fair enough Ben (regarding the 6ft report).

Given that I can't post pictures on here it's a little difficult to put into words but take a look at the hindcast charts (06zDec20th in particular) and you'll see the intensification of the SW fetch on the NW flank of the low, to the south of the sydney region. The swell created from this fetch could not bend back enough on itself to hit the coastline around Sydney, and it was only locations further north (noting the coastline extends eastwards here also) that enabled the swell to bend back into the coastline and hit these locations.

oldo-nicho's picture
oldo-nicho's picture
oldo-nicho Saturday, 25 Dec 2010 at 10:26am

The more technical the better Ben!

Always keen to learn, and I'm sure I'm not the only one here :-)