Oil industry out of their depth at Margaret River

Stu Nettle picture
Stu Nettle (stunet)
Surfpolitik

Adrian Meder works for the Conservation Council of Western Australia and is a member of the Margaret River branch of the Surfrider Foundation. Recently he's been orchestrating a campaign to cast light on the Federal Governments plans to allow oil exploration, and potentially, oil drilling, offshore from the Margaret River region. If you are concerned by such a development please read Adrian's article below and follow it up with the appropriate action. 

Two years have passed since the Mentelle Basin, a large area directly off the coast of Margaret River, was opened up for oil exploration. It is finally time to decide whether we allow oil exploration and development to occur, or whether we protect this area from the risks that such development would bring.

Over the next couple of weeks Federal Environment minister Tony Burke will lock in his marine park plans for the South-west of Australia, and we have the very real opportunity to demonstrate there is somewhere in Australia not up for grabs to the oil industry.

Australia already has vast oil and gas resources developed, and we export billions of dollars worth of fossil fuels to overseas customers each year. To an extent the surf industry depends on these fuels and their by-products, yet it is clear that Australia's 'energy security' is not threatened by a lack of resources and a need to exploit every oil and gas deposit we can find. If it were we would set more aside for local consumption.

The Mentelle Basin lies in some of Australia's wildest waters about 85km off Margaret River, famed for its consistent solid swells and relatively untouched coastline. Combined with the extreme depth of the area (up to twice the depth of the Gulf of Mexico's infamous Deepwater Horizon drilling disaster, which itself was one of the deepest drilling efforts on record), to drill this region would be at the very frontier our technology, and at depths that have proven to be disastrous before.

While this saga has been going on for two years, now is the final opportunity for surfers to make a difference. We know Tony Burke is currently considering whether he has sufficient political capital to enable him to tell industry that this place is too special and too risky for oil development. The solution is available to him is to protect the entire Mentelle Basin in a marine sanctuary, so that the area is off limits to exploitation forever.

At the recent WQS Prime event in Margaret River, past winners including world champ Tom Carroll and local legends Dave Macaulay and Paterson brothers Jake and Paul, took a stand. All of these guys have their own stories as to why this region is so special and deserves protection, but to carry real political weight the voices of the wider surfing community need to be heard now.

Let the government know your story: why Margaret River is important to you, why it should be protected, and what industrialisation and an oil spill in Margaret River would mean. Send it here and we'll deliver it to the decision makers, including Environment Minister Tony Burke, Resources and Energy Minister Martin Ferguson, and key Western Australian MPs.

(Photos: Russell Ord and Rob Alder)

Comments

oceanmandan's picture
oceanmandan's picture
oceanmandan Saturday, 16 Jun 2012 at 2:57pm

I agree! Deep sea resources are a great way of preventing further development, which mean surfers can continue to enjoy the natural resources that miners have no economic benefits from!

roubydouby's picture
roubydouby's picture
roubydouby Friday, 22 Jun 2012 at 9:50am

why has this story not generated more attention Swellnet?

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Friday, 22 Jun 2012 at 10:17am

Not sure RD. Apathy? I posted the story on Facebook twice and got minimal response compared to other posts. Maybe if the timing was better and the Margs comp was on it might've drawn more attention.

At any rate I had another email chat with Adrian Meder post-Tony Burke's recently unveiled marine park plans and will have more on Swellnet shortly.

roubydouby's picture
roubydouby's picture
roubydouby Friday, 22 Jun 2012 at 10:33am

Out of interest Stu, I didn't see this story pop up on my social media, or even on the Swellnet site. I just randomly spied it while looking through older stories. It seems to have fallen into a blind spot. Is it drawing many hits, or is it just not generating debate?

I wonder if it is because the story makes it seem like others have it in hand? Or like you said, are we just too apathetic to care?

stunet's picture
stunet's picture
stunet Friday, 22 Jun 2012 at 10:52am

Well it was posted as usual on FB (twice), but as I said it didn't get much response there. The way FB algorithms work is the story will drop down peoples feeds quickly if it isn't popular. Perhaps that explains why you didn't see them?

I also think part of the reason is that when it was posted no-one knew where the marine park boundaries would lie or what regulations would be enforced. This was more a call for petitioning than discussion.

Traffic? It's a bit down on an average story but not by much. The comments are definitely below average, however. There's a lot going on in the world of surfing at present and this story appears to be suffering for it.

roubydouby's picture
roubydouby's picture
roubydouby Friday, 22 Jun 2012 at 11:06am

Interesting, Cheers for the insight Stu.