The Necessity of Reparation for Historic Injustices
Paul McD ...as do we all (Thanx!) Just earn't the crew an exclusive Part 2.
Cont...crew are just backing up these Aboriginal Tidal bore surfers.
It is said the Oz/Chinese Trade banked up 5,000 years...(Measured from imported hop strains)
Let's just imagine the only way these Aboriginals could surf that far is on the annual Bores.
tbb feels it's important to further explore this untamed surf history...mostly as it warrants attention!
Chinese "Stand Up" Bore surfing began 907-960 bc ... or over 3,000 years ago.
Then it stands to reason that the Chinese "nongchao'er" (Wave Riders)
Learnt how to stand up surf their bore waves" from watching the annual Saltwater crew arrival.
Aborigines expanding Stand up Wave Surfing to China & Tas' Reed craft surfing to South America.
It also makes sense to rise from sitting to standing position to identify as annual trade partner.
Thereby the Aboriginal surfs the head of the dragon in standing position to allay fear.
Surfers know that rider must adapt a changing line to keep with speeding wave...
Meaning constant sudden shifts of weight transfer... also a reason to stand in rivers or lose yer ride!
Here we see the lineage of balance & confidence of such a surfer.
The small payload of sly Grog / Hops / Tobacco / Pearls is worthy for such an epic journey.
tbb has not read of any Chinese Surfers making the return journey...1,000's of years ago!
By 483 BC "The Spirit of the Waves" Flag Flying surfers commemorated Wu Zixu (God of the Tides)
https://www.swellnet.com/news/depth-test/2019/08/08/review-children-tide...
The Necessity of Reparation for Historic Injustices
tbb nominates the inclusion of First Nation > Chinese bore surfers into Surfing's hall of Fame!
Also celebrate World's most ancient o/s trade route to help mend our current short term impasse.
Brilliant TBB. I second that nomination!! I too thought the bloke pictured had a natural surfers stance. Thanks again. Very thought provoking and would love to uncover more too. The original Wozzle!!
First of all...the above Raft needs to be given some context or put into Aboriginal Surf History.
Salute amazing historical Surf artists for Mapping Oz surfcraft History.
David Payne redrafts Donald Thomson's sketches into a zoom friendly Australian Map
Best to share this map as Museum Pages usually vanish! If yer keen...print off a copy for keepsakes!
https://cv.vic.gov.au/media/2373/anmm-watercraft-map-2014-full.jpg
Supafreak asked when this raft became transport...presumably prior to Aboriginal migration.
One must consider the timeline & need to travel...
It's unlikely that many would venture into the unknown without reason.
If the tides receded enough to sight landfall or (100km thru aboriginal eyes) then others will venture!
Historians date the Raft migration to Australia 50,000 y/ago.
Which of course raises Supafreak's question
Oz raft theory
Was the initial crossing by a brave 'logger'...
Did that logger happen upon Oz Mangrove shoreline to return with this bountiful Taxi raft.
Imported Raft
The magroves were on Mainland where raft was constructed
Aboriginal of Origin but of adjacent shoreline make or even earlier water crossings
tbb long read his region was devoid of Ocean Craft only to find it centred Sea craft design.
From Logs > Raft > Hand planes > Moulded > Dug Out > Tied > Rolled > Gathered > Stitched > Resin.
From this point on at this moment of time...one must consider any / all above options for crossing!
Meaning! The best craft is the most resourceful craft relative to that shore & for passengers & loads.
That's why tbb included the Map which shows that beachscape dictates surfcraft design.
eg: A good surfer on shown Mangrove Raft can combo 2 Hunting dogs + a Campsite. Yeah! Exactly!
Probably blow up the internet trying to trace back this raft origin any better & historians say so!
There are certain West African traits that appear as far as east Coast Oz...eg: Dolphin Training.
Can go back much further with rafting though...
Rafting from Africa to South America 30 million years ago. (2 articles)
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/monkeys-raft-across-atlant...
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210511-how-rafts-helped-primates-ru...
The Boy From Boomerang Crescent
Good onya Eddie. Give em hell!! Legend. A warrior who's unafraid to stand up regardless of personal consequences.
(special mention to Josh Jenkins who came out and backed him up today.)
Paul McD wrote:The Boy From Boomerang Crescent
Good onya Eddie. Give em hell!! Legend. A warrior who's unafraid to stand up regardless of personal consequences.
(special mention to Josh Jenkins who came out and backed him up today.)
PaulMcD. Good one mate. Who do some sporting clubs think they are ?
Kudos to Eddie and Josh, two lads not shy at all about calling out the TRUTH, something society has a real problem with doing these days. I must say I was so impressed with Josh Jenkins support toward Eddie, unlike a lot of their other so called team mates who had DUCT tape over their mouths.
Does anyone know what happened at this team camp. Recent articles only mention forced apologies but not went on?
seeds wrote:Does anyone know what happened at this team camp. Recent articles only mention forced apologies but not went on?
Seeds. How things ? . Chapter 17 of Eddie’s book says it all. Despicable ‘Sports Psychology/Come Motivation’ type mob thought they’d just take matters into their own hands, disgusting is all i can say. Well worth a listen to Josh Jenkins oration and highlighted what a real mate of Eddie’s he is, unlike the other squirming Crows players who didn’t say boo or even have the guts to defend him( EB). As for Taylor Walker, racist personified after what he said about aboriginal people last year, now crawling on his hands and knees to appease Eddie, but still didn’t stick up for him when recently asked about this Camp, Walker, said nothing to see here, great camp. Well worth a listen to Josh Jenkins oration on a podcast on SEN 1116 radio in Victoria last week. I and many other Australians are getting very sick of this continual abuse towards aboriginal people and other marginalised groups, am I surprised no, just look at our so called heritage, British, thugs, say no more.
You’ve jogged my memory( which for the record is really bad) about Walker but what is Eddie’s claims about the camp? I haven’t got the book.
seeds wrote:You’ve jogged my memory( which for the record is really bad) about Walker but what is Eddie’s claims about the camp? I haven’t got the book.
Hiya Seeds. I've been keeping a close eye on it last few weeks. As a South oz grom, the Crows were always my second team. But i no longer barrack for them after all this, and after Mark Riccioutos involvement as football manager.
From what i can gather, the main crux of the issue for the indigenous boys was that they were forced into a situation where they were expected to yell, berate and humiliate each other , including their elders (Eddie). This made the young indigenous fellas very uncomfortable and they voiced their concerns, along with a few of the non indignenous fellas, like Josh Jenkins, as Alfred Wallace pointed out (hiya Alfred).
So the clubs response to this was to suggest segregating the indigenous fellas from the non indigenous fellas so as to have a smooth running camp. Now im no rocket science, but i can imagine segregation would be like kicking a wound in the balls and rubbing lime juice in it.
Just my opinion.
The interesting thing is seeing the typical responses coming out....'just get over it'...'i'm sick of seeing it, who cares, move on'. This to me is the reason i started this thread. Makes me feel sick.
Thanks BD. I think your opinion would be pretty close to the mark. Geez after the Collingwood saga and the shit show Goodesy had to endure you’d think other teams would do better.
seeds wrote:Thanks BD. I think your opinion would be pretty close to the mark. Geez after the Collingwood saga and the shit show Goodesy had to endure you’d think other teams would do better.
cheers Seeds. Appreciate your input and feedback on this story. Yeah agree completely. Its a very slow process. But can only hope that these situations are wake up calls and stepping stones forward. Hope you're doing well and getting some fun waves.
Having said that there's a very distinct difference between stepping stones and elevators. My observations on this particular stories are that the stepping stones are actually facing backwards. It's a disgrace. It's actually hard to read this story and feel any hope. I guess the response of the football media was a big positive. There was alot of pure compassion that came out of it that hopefully gave these indigenous fellas alot of hope and light. Such a shameful episode to add to all the above outlined and the many that haven't even been highlighted here.
Let’s hope the voice to parliament gets up. That’s all it is too. Consulting the indigenous in matters that effects them. Don’t worry old white blokes it doesn’t give those pesky First Nations people any ability to decide legislation but imagine decisions made being considerate and consultative of those it effects. Us whities wouldn’t put up with it in reverse.
Plus 1 and +1 to that Seeds. Cheers for keeping the conversation going. Big respect
It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
seeds wrote:It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
Haha. In the last 20 odd years i've considered Paulines comments, but an still yet to reconcile them with reality. But it gets her votes with a certain demographic. What more can you say.
Was in Saigon 20 something years ago and once locals found out we were Aussies the conversation became about the racist Pauline Hanson and her words. Wasn’t it “swamped by asians”
Paul McD wrote:seeds wrote:It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
Haha. In the last 20 odd years i've considered Paulines comments, but an still yet to reconcile them with reality. But it gets her votes with a certain demographic. What more can you say.
PaulMcD, Seeds. Hi to you both, commendable writings here, thoughtful and considerate musings. Right on the money. I, like you guys, hope we can get a National Referendum up and running ASAP, give a total voice to all Aboriginal people, position elders and other leaders within and hopefully yearn towards governance that turns Australia around from its non inclusive policies into a country where all groups of people are considered and respected. I still find it unfathomable that the most marginalised and disrespected people in our country are the longest surviving human culture on the planet, Australian Aborigines. How do we hold our heads up daily knowing that we treat them like SHIT ? Oh, but it’s ok when a state or our nation wants to lever Aboriginal culture when it suits, for example Sydney Olympics, all guns a blazing , Aboriginal motifs, artwork, dance, stories etc., so happy to parade them out when it suits, but when the shows over, back to the old ways. I do wonder how Aboriginal people would have fared if the French had arrived only that little bit earlier.From all my readings and accounts way better than what they ended up with. Much to do.
As for Pauline Hanson, wow, some gene pool she’s from, genetic mutation probably, how else could someone end up like her, she just wears her xenophobic blinkers with pride.
seeds wrote:It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
"Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same."
Wow fuck me dead imagine wanting to treat people as one and not differently based on ethnicity or skin colour...
Its very simple if you want people to be equal you treat them as one, all as Australians and forget ethnicity and treat people and communities on a needs basis not a race basis.
If you want to create division or racial division you treat people differently, seperate voices in parliament, seperate laws, seperate services, you could go further and have seperate schools or whatever.
Anyone who thinks this is a positive or progressive is absolutely brain dead.
If we have to vote which would suck i will vote against it on a morals and principle basis because i doubt believe in treating people differently based on ethnicity or skin colour, but end of the day if it gets up, it also kind of a good thing because it will show people that nothing will change, it takes away excuses and sooner or latter there becomes a point where real solutions, real truth telling and self/community responsibly has to come in....or nothing will change. (which sadly is my prediction )
Anyway I really dont/didnt want to get involved in this conversation, but i can't let little snipes at me go unchallenged.
So best just not reply to my comment or mention me..Cheers
If the playing field was the same for all people then all people should receive the same treatment. It’s obvious to some that the playing field is not the same for all and different players have very different needs . Some can see this others don’t . A voice in decisions that effect the indigenous people of this land is well overdue. Time to stop throwing money at the problems and start listening .
Stone the Crows.
Sounds like they got their camp training ideas out of Full Metal Jacket.
Dumbasses
“ If you want to create division or racial division you treat people differently, seperate voices in parliament, seperate laws, seperate services, you could go further and have seperate schools or whatever.”
Ohmigawd, it’s gonna be like anuvva level of guvmint or sumfink
Main problem with a representative democracy is minority groups tend to be under-represented and their voices not heard due to having the minority voting power.
The problem is particularly acute when that minority is an indigenous population that was historically viewed and treated as non-humans.
In this sense the idea of having a dedicated aboriginal representation in parliament makes sense.
Good luck getting your voice heard as a specialty minority. The government giggles and prevaricates whilst energy cartels rob us all blind, they talk shite about caring for preserving the environment and house affordability and wage growth and rent prices…..then they announce their intentions to ram in millions MOAR immigrants every year so that the environment will be destroyed, houses will be pushed towards demand driven price floors, wages will stagnate and competition for rentals goes from unavailable to extreme paucity.
The Australian people as a whole are treated like shit with zero true representation yet you think the blackfellas will soon be riding high and calling the shots if they get a “voice”?
Lolololol
gsco wrote:Main problem with a representative democracy is minority groups tend to be under-represented and their voices not heard due to having the minority voting power.
The problem is particularly acute when that minority is an indigenous population that was historically viewed and treated as non-humans.
In this sense the idea of having a dedicated aboriginal representation in parliament makes sense.
Our two-party majoritarian system represents minorities quite poorly.
gsco wrote:Main problem with a representative democracy is minority groups tend to be under-represented and their voices not heard due to having the minority voting power.
The problem is particularly acute when that minority is an indigenous population that was historically viewed and treated as non-humans.
In this sense the idea of having a dedicated aboriginal representation in parliament makes sense.
GSCO. Short, superb and succinct.
Supafreak wrote:If the playing field was the same for all people then all people should receive the same treatment. It’s obvious to some that the playing field is not the same for all and different players have very different needs . Some can see this others don’t . A voice in decisions that effect the indigenous people of this land is well overdue. Time to stop throwing money at the problems and start listening .
Obviously ethnicity doesn't determine needs, i have mates with indigenous backgrounds that are more successful than me, big houses, good income happily married with families, and have no more issues than anyone else, i also have mates that are not indigenous and are complete basket cases basically losers and always have been and always will be with all kinds of issues that really need all kinds of help..
Policy based on needs for individuals and communities is obviously the way to go rather than policy based on ethnicity (a very outdated backwards concept), policy based on needs still covers any indigenous people in need and still would always focus on disadvantaged communities where many indigenous people live.
As for the idea money will somehow not be thrown at the problems...ha ha dream on...more money will be as time goes on this won't change and the chances of real progress in these areas is very unlikely.
If you actually want to get best bang for buck, needs based policy instead of race based policy is always more efficient.
I can give you a practical example, when i lived on the Goldie at Mermaid beach there was a torres strait & indigenous health clinic in my street(Venice), as it was so close i use to go there as they could accept a certain small percentage of non indigenous/torres people.
The clinic was top notch modern and obviously well funded with more staff than needed, but it was almost always empty, never had too wait other than for he doc to be ready and when i saw the Doc (Dr Jermey inglis maybe some know him?) a keen surfer we talked surfing for half an hour and a few minutes on the actual reason i was there, no rushed appointments because 90% of the time there was nobody in the waiting room after me.
It was great, and he was a great guy and Doc when he stopped talking about surfing (always gave me heaps of free medical stuff before indo trips), but lets be real the clinic was a waste of funding there was no reason a clinic was needed any indigenous person could have easily gone to a standard clinic and all the funding spent on that clinic could have been spent in a community where it was actually needed and I'm sure if it was in a community with the real need it would have been busy.
So in your mind indigenous Australians define a successful life by how big their house and income is and if they are happily married , is that what you’re saying ? I can’t see why some are getting upset if this legislation is passed . In the past governments have thought they knew best what aboriginal Australians needed and wanted without really asking. Will a voice in parliament be the absolute solution? I doubt it but it’s a small step in the right direction.
Supafreak wrote:So in your mind indigenous Australians define a successful life by how big their house and income is and if they are happily married , is that what you’re saying ? I can’t see why some are getting upset if this legislation is passed . In the past governments have thought they knew best what aboriginal Australians needed and wanted without really asking. Will a voice in parliament be the absolute solution? I doubt it but it’s a small step in the right direction.
When you say mind clearly you’re speaking figuratively …..
indo-dreaming wrote:seeds wrote:It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
"Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same."
Wow fuck me dead imagine wanting to treat people as one and not differently based on ethnicity or skin colour...
Its very simple if you want people to be equal you treat them as one, all as Australians and forget ethnicity and treat people and communities on a needs basis not a race basis.
If you want to create division or racial division you treat people differently, seperate voices in parliament, seperate laws, seperate services, you could go further and have seperate schools or whatever.
Anyone who thinks this is a positive or progressive is absolutely brain dead.
If we have to vote which would suck i will vote against it on a morals and principle basis because i doubt believe in treating people differently based on ethnicity or skin colour, but end of the day if it gets up, it also kind of a good thing because it will show people that nothing will change, it takes away excuses and sooner or latter there becomes a point where real solutions, real truth telling and self/community responsibly has to come in....or nothing will change. (which sadly is my prediction )
Anyway I really dont/didnt want to get involved in this conversation, but i can't let little snipes at me go unchallenged.
So best just not reply to my comment or mention me..Cheers
Indo how about quoting the next sentence of mine to show my post in context. The next sentence makes it quite obvious equality is the goal but as Super pointed out, as did I, when have our indigenous ever been treated equally. Part and parcel of treating anyone equally is listening to their point of view and respecting that. Allowing some self determination. And that is what the voice is about. You seem to have all the answers they need and there in lies the ongoing problem. As I also said it doesn’t give any power to legislate so don’t panic.
Paul McD wrote:seeds wrote:You’ve jogged my memory( which for the record is really bad) about Walker but what is Eddie’s claims about the camp? I haven’t got the book.
Hiya Seeds. I've been keeping a close eye on it last few weeks. As a South oz grom, the Crows were always my second team. But i no longer barrack for them after all this, and after Mark Riccioutos involvement as football manager.
From what i can gather, the main crux of the issue for the indigenous boys was that they were forced into a situation where they were expected to yell, berate and humiliate each other , including their elders (Eddie). This made the young indigenous fellas very uncomfortable and they voiced their concerns, along with a few of the non indignenous fellas, like Josh Jenkins, as Alfred Wallace pointed out (hiya Alfred).
So the clubs response to this was to suggest segregating the indigenous fellas from the non indigenous fellas so as to have a smooth running camp. Now im no rocket science, but i can imagine segregation would be like kicking a wound in the balls and rubbing lime juice in it.
Just my opinion.
The interesting thing is seeing the typical responses coming out....'just get over it'...'i'm sick of seeing it, who cares, move on'. This to me is the reason i started this thread. Makes me feel sick.
PaulMcD. Therein lies the problem, ‘segregation’.
Paul McD wrote:seeds wrote:It was disappointing seeing the grifting Pauline recently crapping on about apartheid and one nation as laughable as it is. Then Indo parrots the same nonsense about we are one nation and all should be treated the same. Fact check Indo the Blackfellas have never been treated the same. The wogs daigos ities chinks etc (to use some old labels)have pretty well been accepted but still not our indigenous peoples by some. It’s still the old colonial attitude.
Haha. In the last 20 odd years i've considered Paulines comments, but an still yet to reconcile them with reality. But it gets her votes with a certain demographic. What more can you say.
PaulMcD. Hope you are well. I thought you may be interested in this article http://apple.news/ApVgzJxfgR26SkvMpv5_LVQ 14/8/22 from The Age news service. Disturbing to say the least.
For those amongst us (not me) who think all things aboriginal are on the improve, well here is an issue thats slaps you all in the face. Can you believe in this day and age, individuals or groups are still painting/writing appalling material as was painted on this welcome to Sea Lakes sign in northern Victoria. The so called historical Mallee Rally (all 47 years) around Lake Tyrell, a 30,000 year old lake system that supported aboriginal people for tens of thousands of years, use to hold water, but rarely does these days due to intensive agriculture and irrigation in the region and since 1974 has been trashed by car enthusiasts. This lake is part of a greater system tied in with the Willandra lakes (home to the skeletal remains of Mungo Man and Woman). Australians still need many more history lessons to fully understand what’s old and what’s not. Locals (not the very true locals) are hoping to encourage more visitors to Sea Lakes, good luck with a welcome sign emblazoned with filth. The only visitors will be people of the same ilk IMO. Another tragedy for indigenous people, its never ending and goes on daily (reported and unreported)right around our continent . When will we realistically appreciate how old our land mass and its original inhabitants are. Europe, meh, historic my arse, what all 2000 years, just a piss in the ocean (a rising one at that). Fucking fed up with apathy in this place.
You do realise you can be devastated by foul behaviour towards indigenous without delving into rancid racism yourself?
The ancestors of Europeans walked the Earth just as long as their cousins who migrated to Australia thousands of years ago. Maybe pick up a history book.
DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:You do realise you can be devastated by foul behaviour towards indigenous without delving into rancid racism yourself?
The ancestors of Europeans walked the Earth just as long as their cousins who migrated to Australia thousands of years ago. Maybe pick up a history book.
DSDS. Hi valued comment, my error. Frankly, you are missing the point, again another article about derisive behaviour towards aboriginal people. I originally was meaning to refer to all of its so called culture, old towns, cities etc. that Australians seem to refer to as soooo old when frankly its not, you are correct about your former comment no doubting the history of indigenous peoples across Europe as valuable as it is. No history book needed here, married to a European who happens to be an anthropologist and an archaeologist, so if you want me to crap on about Europes indigenous peoples, give me a hoy, but thats not what this news item was about. It’s about deplorable behaviour toward the longest existing culture on the planet. Where’s the acknowledgment and a bit of national pride from us, none. Feel like an LP record going round and round and round again on this matter. You may sleep soundly in your bed, but I don’t.
Maybe AlfredWallace can correct me of I'm wrong, but the current understanding is every human on this planet is of the same species - homo sapiens - and any two humans are at least 99% genetically similar. There are no remaining other human-like species different to ours.
The earliest dated human (home sapiens) remains are found in Africa and are from about 300,000 years ago.
It is believed that there were two main waves of human migration out of Africa.
The first was between about 130,000 and 115,000 years ago and is believed to have retreated back to Africa and/or died out, possibly due to an environmental catastrophe or ice age conditions.
The humans alive today are believed to be from the second wave of migration that started about 70,000 years ago.
What I find really interesting is that interbreeding was still believed possible with other related "archaic" human species, including Neanderthals and Denisovans (and some undefined others). It's believed that humans have up to 6% of DNA from these archaic species.
So it seems that we are all the same and there is no basis for racism, or even any such thing as "race" on this planet.
Gday Alfred. Doing well thanks. Thanks for the share.
The rally shouldn't be allowed to proceed against the wishes of the traditional land owners. Simple.
I wonder how situations like this might change with some kind of indigenous representation in parliament. It may be just one voice to start with, but you can't help but imagine it would be a strong advocate for indigenous issues that would normally get swept aside for the sake of profiteering for those not intimately involved with the places in question. And hey, it's better than what has been contributed in the past! (i.e nothing...no voice and fighting to be recognised as human)
Hope you're going well too.
From the article...."Water is prevented from flowing regularly into the river’s tributaries by catchment management authorities and landholders who use channels and dams to divert water from the natural Avoca River system, he says.
“The lake is meant to have water in it. It’s meant to have native vegetation all around it. It needs a whole rehabilitation process,” Kennedy says. “There’s none of our totemic, spiritual species there at all. No pelican, no red tail cockatoos, no quolls. You don’t even see any goanna.”
Sad and unacceptable.
Some good news and another piece of the puzzle in place going forward.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-08-15/aboriginal-cultural-centre-built-...
GSCO. Good research. Cant argue with any of that. Australian aborigines are closely tied to our northern neighbours, the Macassar people of SE Asia. 47,500 years old is currently the accepted date amongst archeologists for the oldest existence of our first peoples, nowhere else is there a culture as continuous as ours. An interesting finish to long awaited research, its now accepted that when early colonists first arrived, it was assumed that there were approximately 750,000 aborigines but new data now predicts a population of anywhere between 1-6million. Farming practices were well documented over time by early colonists and disproved the theory that aboriginal people were just aimlessly wandering around hunting and gathering. Good chat
“Australian aborigines are closely tied to our northern neighbours, the Macassar people of SE Asia.”
“ From at least 1700 until 1907, hundreds of fishermen sailed each year from Makassar on the island of Sulawesi (now Indonesia) to the Arnhem Land coast, an area they called Marege.
Makasar traded with Aboriginal people for trepang (sea cucumber), which they boiled down, dried on their boats and traded with China where it is still used for food and medicine.
The Makasar did not settle in Arnhem Land but they did have an influence on the Yolŋu people’s society and ritual.”
https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/trade-with-the-makasar
Wow, imagine the wisdom gained from 40,000 plus years and the things seen over those lifetimes that have been passed down through the generations that we're not privvy to. The mind boggles.
AndyM wrote:“Australian aborigines are closely tied to our northern neighbours, the Macassar people of SE Asia.”
“ From at least 1700 until 1907, hundreds of fishermen sailed each year from Makassar on the island of Sulawesi (now Indonesia) to the Arnhem Land coast, an area they called Marege.
Makasar traded with Aboriginal people for trepang (sea cucumber), which they boiled down, dried on their boats and traded with China where it is still used for food and medicine.
The Makasar did not settle in Arnhem Land but they did have an influence on the Yolŋu people’s society and ritual.”https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/trade-with-the-makasar
AndyM. Thanks for the info on the topic. AW
What I find most amazing about the Aboriginal Australians is they lived here sustainably for like 40 or 50 thousand years, without overpopulation or environmental destruction, working together with and in respect of the land. When Europeans came here it was like an untouched land of abundance.
It would be amazing if there was detailed written and documented records of the culture, history, lifestyle, civilisation, environmental management and overall way of life of the Aboriginal peoples to see exactly how they achieved their balance with nature for so long.
(Maybe there is?)
gsco wrote:What I find most amazing about the Aboriginal Australians is they lived here sustainably for like 40 or 50 thousand years, without overpopulation or environmental destruction, working together with and in respect of the land. When Europeans came here it was like an untouched land of abundance.
It would be amazing if there was detailed written and documented records of the culture, history, lifestyle, civilisation, environmental management and overall way of life of the Aboriginal peoples to see exactly how they achieved their balance with nature for so long.
(Maybe there is?)
Man there's heaps of books out there! Try reading some early explorers accounts... Edward Eyre is a good place to start... but remember the language of the day did have its bias.
gsco wrote:What I find most amazing about the Aboriginal Australians is they lived here sustainably for like 40 or 50 thousand years, without overpopulation or environmental destruction, working together with and in respect of the land. When Europeans came here it was like an untouched land of abundance.
It would be amazing if there was detailed written and documented records of the culture, history, lifestyle, civilisation, environmental management and overall way of life of the Aboriginal peoples to see exactly how they achieved their balance with nature for so long.
(Maybe there is?)
GSCO. Agree. Simply, they observed and passed it on through generations. We could never achieve that level of sustainability because our societies are unfortunately driven by greed.
Geez you tak absolute dung Alfred Wallace.
The blackfellas in Australian would have learnt the land’s tolerance of harvest by trial and error like anyone else. Of course they would’ve over harvested at times and learnt to reign it in or there’d be no food next time. Just like every other Hunter gatherer tribe in any other location across the planet. They wouldn’t have done it too often or they would’ve starved or depleted a certain species. Like megafauna for example.
Not sure what you think the rest of humanity was doing for the 100,000 years before agriculture? My ancestors and your ancestors. Living unsustainably? Or is your fantasy of immaculate fairies in the garden reserved for the fetishised noble savage? Though I’m pretty sure Easter Island must test that dream sequence even amongst the deluded.
You need to read guns, germs and steel to improve your insight and education. Find out the factual rational behind the manner of cultural emergence.
Definitely had enough of your perpetuating your Evil whitey theories…..you can stick that racist bullshit in your claka bloke.
Anti humanist, white-man scourge of the planet….you don’t have much up top do you bloke?
DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:Geez you tak absolute dung Alfred Wallace.
The blackfellas in Australian would have learnt the land’s tolerance of harvest by trial and error like anyone else. Of course they would’ve over harvested at times and learnt to reign it in or there’d be no food next time. Just like every other Hunter gatherer tribe in any other location across the planet. They wouldn’t have done it too often or they would’ve starved or depleted a certain species. Like megafauna for example.
Not sure what you think the rest of humanity was doing for the 100,000 years before agriculture? My ancestors and your ancestors. Living unsustainably? Or is your fantasy of immaculate fairies in the garden reserved for the fetishised noble savage? Though I’m pretty sure Easter Island must test that dream sequence even amongst the deluded.
You need to read guns, germs and steel to improve your insight and education. Find out the factual rational behind the manner of cultural emergence.
Definitely had enough of your perpetuating your Evil whitey theories…..you can stick that racist bullshit in your claka bloke.
Anti humanist, white-man scourge of the planet….you don’t have much up top do you bloke?
DSDS. You know nothing about archeology at all, just full of shit. Try reading Dark Emu by Bruce Pascoe, you may learn a thing about what farming practices were being undertaken, book shows plenty of the old first black and white photos of enormous stockpiles of grain, dried grasses and other plant harvests. Looked like farming to me.
AlfredWallace wrote:DudeSweetDudeSweet wrote:Geez you tak absolute dung Alfred Wallace.
The blackfellas in Australian would have learnt the land’s tolerance of harvest by trial and error like anyone else. Of course they would’ve over harvested at times and learnt to reign it in or there’d be no food next time. Just like every other Hunter gatherer tribe in any other location across the planet. They wouldn’t have done it too often or they would’ve starved or depleted a certain species. Like megafauna for example.
Not sure what you think the rest of humanity was doing for the 100,000 years before agriculture? My ancestors and your ancestors. Living unsustainably? Or is your fantasy of immaculate fairies in the garden reserved for the fetishised noble savage? Though I’m pretty sure Easter Island must test that dream sequence even amongst the deluded.
You need to read guns, germs and steel to improve your insight and education. Find out the factual rational behind the manner of cultural emergence.
Definitely had enough of your perpetuating your Evil whitey theories…..you can stick that racist bullshit in your claka bloke.
Anti humanist, white-man scourge of the planet….you don’t have much up top do you bloke?
DSDS. You know nothing about archeology at all, just full of shit. Try reading Dark Emu by Bruce Pascoe, you may learn a thing about what farming practices were being undertaken, book shows plenty of the old first black and white photos of enormous stockpiles of grain, dried grasses and other plant harvests. Looked like farming to me.
You just decided to go off on a unrelated rant about a seperate tangent ?
That’s cute.
https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2022/08/25/filmmaker-rachel-perkins-.... "The Australian Wars has the potential to benefit how current and future generations understand the Australian historical narrative, benefit journeys of healing and shared understanding."
Uni assignment i did a few years ago. This is my take on things. I'm sure this will ruffle many feathers. I hope so.
Love Blue Diamond x
The Necessity of Reparation for Historic Injustices
Introduction – Compensatory Justice
Disparities between the standards of living of humans on this planet have long been a part of our history on this planet. From the wealthy nations of the West to the developing and undeveloped nations on this globe, the diversity in the quality of life when viewed from a moral standpoint are without a doubt grossly unfair.
In this paper I will look at why historic injustices do require some form of reparation. I take a strong stance that we are more obliged to solve current injustices than to provide reparation for every act of injustice in the past. In doing this I will first investigate the historic injustice of the Aboriginal people of Australia and I will look at the argument that they are entitled to some form of reparation and why.
I will incoroporate some interesting views from Jeremy Waldron, Robert Nozick and others which will help me slowly build to my conclusion that reparation should be in the form of Non Indigenous Australians surrendering some of our priveleges as a form of reparation.
Historic Injustices to Indigenous Australians:
Australia the continent was well inhabited for many years long before white settlement. It is commonly known that in 1788 Australia was colonised as a country under the rule of the British Empire, with total contempt for the fact that it was already inhabited by a native indigenous race of people.
The way the original inhabitants have been treated, including forced assimilation, execution, stolen families and not even allowed to be recognised as citizens for a large part of white Australia’s history are also well known facts. (Poole, 1999,pp114-142)
There exists now a situation where there is a large divide between Aboriginal and non Aboriginal Australian’s that can be traced back to the moment Australia was invaded by English settlers and the brutal and unfair treatment that has followed.
So at this point now, in 2013 what is the just and fair way to make amends for past actions?
I would argue that a moderate to large amount of reparation is overdue for this nation of people, the Aboriginal people. But there are many challenges to this view point especially that of how much reparation, and what sort of compensation.
Past injustices or present suffering?
One of the questions raised in an issue like this is whether it is better to provide compensation or reparation for past deeds, which have already been done in a previous generation and cannot be changed, or whether it is better to now provide assistance to those who are suffering in their current situations and consider that as a form of moral duty.
To understand this we need to delve a little deeper into this issue and hear some differing viewpoints.
Firstly we need to understand what the best way to provide reparation. How do we judge what is the best way of giving back and how much? Jeremy Waldron states “The historic record has a fragility that consists, …in the sheer contingency of what happened in the past” (Waldron,1992,p5 )
This is saying that we can’t trace every single injustice back to the original act therefore reparation for every act would be almost impossible because it would ultimately be guess work.
In this statement he has an objection from Robert Nozick who believes it is in fact possible to address this problem by “changing the present so that it resembles how the past would have looked had the injustice not taken place” (McKenzie, 2013)
This would be a way to ultimately provide maximum reparation, but is it the correct approach? I believe this is a fairly radical approach, although it does have some merits in the fact it would be working in a positive way for indigenous people, I don’t think it is entirely the right way to deal with these issues but it is on the right track.
Waldron argues that it is based on too many unknowns. “The status of counterfactual reasoning about the exercising of human reasoning of human freedom is unclear”(Waldron 1993,p10)
Which leaves the question somewhat open about the sort of reparation that is required, but provides one clear answer to the key question. Both agree that yes, reparation to some extent is required. But how much and in what form?
Another philosopher who leans more towards Waldron’s views is Kymlicka. He is somewhat more straightforward in his assessment that property rights in particular for Aboriginals would create “massive unfairness” and also he maintains the argument “Aboriginal rights must be grounded in concerns about equality and contemporary disadvantage. (McKenzie, 2013) I agree with both these views but I don’t think they provide any active solutions.
The Solution?
So if its not handing back all of Australia’s land to the original inhabitants that is the most appropriate way to deal with past injustices, then what is?
I look at the current country I grew up in, as a white Australian. I ask myself why I never had Aboriginal friends growing up, no understanding of Aboriginal culture and why my basic understanding of Indigenous Australians is mostly 200 years old. I look at our flag, a symbol of a nation that stole a country from its original inhabitants, with no recognition of the Indigenous people at all on it. I see that Australia considered Indigenous people as less than people until only 40 years ago and I see the way that Indigenous Australians live a completely separate life to the way of life I know as an Australian. I see that the only indigenous politician I am aware of is a former Olympian and it is because of this fact of her sporting status that I know this. I see no collective power or representation of Indigenous Australians and I see non Indigenous Australians,( a culture built on a history of stealing a land and mistreating its people) still taking, taking as much out of this land as they can, with little to no regard of sharing or giving to the original inhabitants. I see a government that says lots of words about ‘closing the gap’ and bringing the living standards of non- indigenous and indigenous Australians closer together, but apart from nice words, there is no conviction, no follow through, just assimilation , and all that still remains are injustices.
As stated by Sparrow, “Continuity gives rise to responsibility on part of present generations of Australians for our history”.(McKenzie,2013). Although deeds happened in the past beyond our control, what we do now to either ignore, or rectify these issues will reflect on us in history. So if we choose to do nothing, we are contributing to the history of the mistreatment of non- indigenous Australians. And this is simply unacceptable in my opinion.
Conclusion
So what is fair? I believe that the way forward is a surrendering of some of our privileges as non- indigenous Australians. The simple fact is it was morally wrong without a doubt what has happened in the past. And it is also morally wrong without a doubt to ignore these facts and not offer some form of reparation in the present. But how much?
I think that going back to Robert Nozick’s argument is a start. I think Nozick is wrong to make the present resemble the past in every aspect. But I do think that it would be reasonable to restore some aspects of the way things should be. The things that happened in the past were out of our control and we can’t go back to changing the way things were. But we could change the way things are.
For some examples. Why not give at least 50% of political power to indigenous people? It surely would be a fair thing to do considering this is their country. Media control. 50 percent. Industry. Realestate. The list goes on. Why do we not acknowledge the indigenous people on our flag, or better still use their flag? Why is Australia still a part of the Commonwealth when it serves little purpose to any of us and serves as a constant reminder to Indigenous Australians that they are still controlled by the original invaders. These to me are fairly simple reparations that would have minimal impact on Australia as a whole. Perhaps, it would alter the way we live but I think it is our responsibility, morally to forfeit some of our privileges for the greater good. Basically a little bit goes a long way.
In closing, it is a fact that a huge injustice occurred to the Indigenous population and suffering continues to this day. There is no easy solution to such a burden of pain. I believe the only solutions are for the non- Indigenous population to take responsibility and sacrifice our own way of life to bring about an overall equality. Sacrifice is not an easy word. But it all comes down to right and wrong. We are in a position to give, in this current generation. What are we so scared to lose, that was never ours in the first place??
Bibliography
McKenzie,C.”Prof” (2013), Lecture, Historic Injustices and Indigenous Rights, Macquarie University
Poole, R. (1999). Nation and Identity.Routledge, London, pp.114-142
Waldron,J. (1992). ‘Superseding Historic Injustice’. Ethics, 103 (1), 4-28
References
Poole, R. (1999). Nation and Identity.Routledge, London, pp.114-142
Waldron,J. (1992). ‘Superseding Historic Injustice’. Ethics, 103 (1), 4-28