Climate change wankers
"Either way, they just hate facts."
Facts?
Ahem...ozone hole?
southey quote "Ducks will literally fly thousands of KM's to area about to get inundated or just been ."
now imagine 100 years from now. replace ducks with 500,000,000 Africans.
destination....your backyard.
when did Mt Erebus erupt Stu. What did it put into the air that ozone doesn't like. What patents did Dupont have regarding the new gases to be used and when did they take out those patents?
And if you get really interested:
“disintegration of ozone when the sun is active dominates above 45km”
“Here we show that these spectral changes appear to have led to a significant decline from 2004 to 2007 in stratospheric ozone below an altitude of 45 km, with an increase above this altitude.”
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7316/abs/nature09426.html
&feature=youtu.be&t=25m1shttp://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v467/n7316/slides/nature09426-pf1.ppt
Inigo Jones also says “the minima occur when the sunspot zones and the earthly hemisphere concerned are more directly turned to each other, it is easily seen that it is the sunspots and the sunspots alone that are responsible.”
Fascinating stuff disco. Now you might like to explain its relevance to ozone depletion which had been occurring for at least 30 years prior to the data you quoted.
Just like to throw this in the mix, it's not really a position on one side of the argument or the other, just a friendly reminder to wax up those Northern Hemi snowboards for this season:
https://weather.com/news/weather/news/snow-siberia-russia-united-states-...
I would bet my middle testicle that disco is one of those total kooks who think they rip.
Would outsurf you any day of the week dogface.
disco and nick ... conjoined twins sharing the one brain cell ....
what does wanking, gay sex, and face pee have in common? the only link i see is that nick and disco think about cocks a whole lot.
conjoined twins.....or the same person ?
aaaaw sorry nick, thought it was the funniest thing I've read here for a long time ... laughed my chops off
not me princess
So this thread is now null and void. Trump aint signing on to the Paris charade. Man made global warming from now on will be called "the weather".
How dja loik dem apples climate drones?!!!
disco thinks trump will pull out of paris......how cute.
watch this space, trump will flip. he's done it once already.
tehehehehhe, awww. awww still trying to live the fantasy! Love it! The longer you hold onto that hope, the more painful it will be for you and the more I will enjoy it.
He couldn't win he couldn't win. he wouldn't take the US out of paris, he couldn't, could he!
Where are all the bigmouths? Lost your typing skills? tehehehehhehe
CAN YOU FEEL IT??? CAN>>>>YOU>>>>>FEEELLLLLLLLL>>>>>>>>>ITTTTTTTTTT?????
Happyass...We all see the promises before elections... We all see the bullshit.... But only a select few, a retarded bunch, actually believe politicians and what they say in the weeks before an election..... But let disco duck have his trolling fun, happy.... Divorcees dont have much in their lives. They're very lonely and need interaction bahahahahahaha
btw, I think it's great what trump has done to the right wing republican party..... Buried Cruze, buried Rubio, Buried Jeb Bush, even had the right disowning him during the pussy grab scandal.... And the representation of all that is wrong with the conservatives old GW bush himself said today he refused to vote for Trump!!
The best thing is that we will never ever have another Bush or Clinton in the whitehouse.
Not by name you mean.
Disco ,post a photo of yourself surfing to prove me wrong, if not we will all know you are a KOOK at surfing as well as science. The way I see it any person who has spent enough time around the ocean and nature to get proficient at surfing couldn't possibly have your attitude towards our precious environment . That goes for you too nicky boy. Put up or shut the fuck up. You guys are so clueless you have no idea what fools you have made of yourselves. We are waiting, I hope you prove my theory wrong. Cheers.
OldD, if someone loves the ocean, spent his life in it, near it, whatever and of course is concerned and active in environmental issues, do they have to believe in human induced climate change as espoused by the IPCC ? Concern and love of the environment does not assume belief in the reports of the IPCC.
No Tony, the only requirement for believing the IPCC is the wit to realise that the scientific standards behind it are as rigorous as the research that created the Internet, sends probes to Mars, creates cures for disease etc etc etc.
Hi Tony, Good point, but the way I see it there are people out there who are like the Kelly Slaters of climate science having devoted their lives to studying this shit , 21st century science is the cumulative result of thousands of our top brains up until this point in time. Who the fark are we to think we can skim the surface of this complex issue and think we know better . Cheers.
having a night out off the medication yokel?
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcov...
Page 1. 50 plus scientists listed as the core team. If you count those whose published papers are included, probably 1000 plus. In fact, every professional climate scientist in the world is almost certainly in there somewhere. What have you got? Oh yeh, pathetic sub-standard, near moronic abuse that would probably work in a primary school playground. But guess what, I'm a big boy, and your shit just doesn't cut it. You want insults...now let me think, how about you rat fucking pieces of fermented faeces? But I think I can do better than that. How about evil shit sucking, child raping, brain dead pieces of decaying rat semen? Sleep well!
BB, it is certainly not correct to assume that all the various strands of scientific endeavour have the same rigorous research methodologies. For example, the science of medicine is totally different to getting a man on the moon or to mars for that matter. You should not use the 'internet'. The Internet protocols were devised for warfare.
BB - you ok ? At least you believe that we need nuclear power to address this. At present, that's true.
quote nick: " So please explain why the mentally constrained who agree with these scientist's because they are educated and smarter than us why they disagree with all the scientist who disagree"
I can see how statements like this might confuse the retarded into doubting climate change.
loving your work happy
gunna hide your face with an australian flag patriot?
Gonna call time on this thread if the tone continues...
I love my planet and when I speak to others in the community who share that same sense of connection with our earth, it is very natural for me to consider the damage we humans are doing to our earth. Get on google earth and look at our footprint. Its our impact in a 'nutshell'. I don't see Giraffes causing the same impact, nor sharks for that matter. How can it be so hard to accept that we 'may' be causing damage?
You are such a sook nicko, you give heaps to people for years on your mindless theories on climate, so-called welfare cheats and god knows whatever else and as soon as someone cracks it with you (be it in over the top terms in this instance) you threaten biffo. You had it long coming.
YLocal ..is it micro 'damage' or macro 'damage'. What is damage ? Population, yep the elephant in the room.
Stu ... heh free speech man.
As I've said once and said a thousand-fucken-times, this is a private website, you are not in public here. And even if you were in public how long would talk of child rape be tolerated?
Free speech comes with responsibility. I'm sure I read that somewhere....maybe a movie cover or something.
nick....... To be fair, you dish a lot of crap to people..... So suck it up buttercup..... I absolutely disagree with BB on a lot of things, the full extent of climate change to be one of them..... And yes we do sometimes get a bit narky.... But you, ween, disco, koch take it to a whole new level.... And in a way you are a child rapist.... you don't rape their bodies persee, but any person under the age of 16 that would view this thread would have their minds raped by the utter filth trolls like you fill these pages with.
Perhaps that's why we rarelt have young people taking part in these threads, due to the bullying you promote....... And once you are bullied back, you resort to "step oustide".....
Do you have kids, man? If so, can u get one of them to create an account, read your stuff, and let him/her air his opinion on it?
Pathetic, man....
Nuff said...
Reckon we'll leave all talk of family members out of it, eh?
Back to your corners, fellas.
Tonybarber said: "YLocal ..is it micro 'damage' or macro 'damage'. What is damage ? Population, yep the elephant in the room."
Given the breadth of potential issues the majority of research is pointing to, its undoubtedly macro to me. But to simplify things, look at any photo of the planet's darkside and it is clear to see that we humans have made a monumental impact on how our planet looks from space. Its filled with networks of light. It is not too far a stretch to consider that we as humans easily have the capability to have a 'macro' effect on our planet.
To be so easily sceptical of our impact on climate, shouldn't we also be able to deny the magnitude of things like overfishing? the effect of all-out nuclear war? These things we accept immediately.
Like this sheepy ......
@ young nicky boy I think you missed my point , Skimming the surface of AGL and then claiming you know more than the entire Worlds scientific community is exactly like the total kook screaming across a wave in classic poo stance wildly arm waving and thinking he's carving big turns. Its healthy for people like SD and TB to question the science but when you think you're right and the rest of the World is brain dead it could be time to have a good hard look in the mirror. Like the losers who go on TV talent shows, talk themselves up then sing like a strangled cat and then spit the dummy when the judges tell them they stink. At first it was mildly amusing but now I'm starting to feel sorry for you, still I can't help but admire your resilience. You made your mind up long ago and aint nothing going to change so lets just agree to disagree. Cheers.
PS great moderating stunet.
These threads which are commented on mostly by the swellnet "intellectuals", are so bloody embarrassing it's not funny! Have you guys ever just taken a step back and had a look at what you've written to each other? It's like a bunch of primary school kids teasing and calling each other names!
You're meant to be mature grown men, it's a fucken joke!
Anyway, don't let me stop you, back to it!
Ummmm goofy, you got form too, bro... I recall mentioning my theory on sharks and you went full blown for the throat.... And that was in an article not a forum. I wasn't attacking anyone... I was just putting a theory across and you went for character assasination.... So don't blow a trumpet, mate
http://principia-scientific.org/supportnews/latest-news/163-new-discover...
Now to all you fruit loops. This is the end to the biggest load bullshit of all time. The government know's it (but still won't say it ), the smart people like me know it. When will you clowns please apologise to me for your un-educated attacks.
To all the man made global warmest alarmist's suck shit losers.
Now go and do something worthwhile fuckwits.